Nicole Holliday, Peter Delobelle, Carmen Klinger, Zandile June-Rose Mchiza, Olufunke Alaba, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Peter von Philipsborn, Karin Geffert
{"title":"解决南非营养不良双重负担的政策执行和建议:利用扩大的健康食品环境政策指数(Food- epi)进行专家评估。","authors":"Nicole Holliday, Peter Delobelle, Carmen Klinger, Zandile June-Rose Mchiza, Olufunke Alaba, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Peter von Philipsborn, Karin Geffert","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04191-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa faces a double burden of malnutrition (DBM), the coexistence and interaction of multiple forms of malnutrition (undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight/obesity) within individuals and households and across the life course. A healthy food environment is necessary to reduce this DBM. The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) can be used to evaluate the implementation of public nutrition and food environment policies in comparison with international best practices. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of implementation of healthy food environment policies in South Africa using an expanded DBM Food-EPI framework, benchmark policies against international best practices, develop priority policy recommendations, and compare implementation progress since the 2016 South African Food-EPI assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to March 2024, a panel of 23 national experts from different tiers of government (Department of Health), academia, and civil society was invited to participate in the Food-EPI assessment. Through two workshops and online feedback, experts evaluated the implementation of food environment policies across 60 indicators, compared these policies to international best practices, and proposed and prioritized a list of policy actions based on perceived implementation gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 invited experts, 13 participated in the benchmarking workshop in which about 70% of indicators were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. Overall, of the 48 original indicators, the mean level of implementation improved from 2016 to 2024. Of the 12 indicators that addressed the DBM, eight were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. The experts (original panel plus four additional participants) then proposed ten priority actions, mainly across the domains of Food Promotion, Food Prices, Funding, and Platforms for Interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of the expanded Food-EPI in South Africa showed improvements for the original indicators compared with 2016 and highlights the need for additional policy efforts to improve public nutrition policy and address the DBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy implementation and recommendations to address the double burden of malnutrition in South Africa: expert assessment using the expanded Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Holliday, Peter Delobelle, Carmen Klinger, Zandile June-Rose Mchiza, Olufunke Alaba, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Peter von Philipsborn, Karin Geffert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04191-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa faces a double burden of malnutrition (DBM), the coexistence and interaction of multiple forms of malnutrition (undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight/obesity) within individuals and households and across the life course. A healthy food environment is necessary to reduce this DBM. The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) can be used to evaluate the implementation of public nutrition and food environment policies in comparison with international best practices. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of implementation of healthy food environment policies in South Africa using an expanded DBM Food-EPI framework, benchmark policies against international best practices, develop priority policy recommendations, and compare implementation progress since the 2016 South African Food-EPI assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2023 to March 2024, a panel of 23 national experts from different tiers of government (Department of Health), academia, and civil society was invited to participate in the Food-EPI assessment. Through two workshops and online feedback, experts evaluated the implementation of food environment policies across 60 indicators, compared these policies to international best practices, and proposed and prioritized a list of policy actions based on perceived implementation gaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 invited experts, 13 participated in the benchmarking workshop in which about 70% of indicators were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. Overall, of the 48 original indicators, the mean level of implementation improved from 2016 to 2024. Of the 12 indicators that addressed the DBM, eight were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. The experts (original panel plus four additional participants) then proposed ten priority actions, mainly across the domains of Food Promotion, Food Prices, Funding, and Platforms for Interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of the expanded Food-EPI in South Africa showed improvements for the original indicators compared with 2016 and highlights the need for additional policy efforts to improve public nutrition policy and address the DBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04191-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04191-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Policy implementation and recommendations to address the double burden of malnutrition in South Africa: expert assessment using the expanded Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).
Background: South Africa faces a double burden of malnutrition (DBM), the coexistence and interaction of multiple forms of malnutrition (undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight/obesity) within individuals and households and across the life course. A healthy food environment is necessary to reduce this DBM. The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) can be used to evaluate the implementation of public nutrition and food environment policies in comparison with international best practices. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of implementation of healthy food environment policies in South Africa using an expanded DBM Food-EPI framework, benchmark policies against international best practices, develop priority policy recommendations, and compare implementation progress since the 2016 South African Food-EPI assessment.
Methods: From October 2023 to March 2024, a panel of 23 national experts from different tiers of government (Department of Health), academia, and civil society was invited to participate in the Food-EPI assessment. Through two workshops and online feedback, experts evaluated the implementation of food environment policies across 60 indicators, compared these policies to international best practices, and proposed and prioritized a list of policy actions based on perceived implementation gaps.
Results: Of the 23 invited experts, 13 participated in the benchmarking workshop in which about 70% of indicators were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. Overall, of the 48 original indicators, the mean level of implementation improved from 2016 to 2024. Of the 12 indicators that addressed the DBM, eight were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. The experts (original panel plus four additional participants) then proposed ten priority actions, mainly across the domains of Food Promotion, Food Prices, Funding, and Platforms for Interaction.
Conclusions: Application of the expanded Food-EPI in South Africa showed improvements for the original indicators compared with 2016 and highlights the need for additional policy efforts to improve public nutrition policy and address the DBM.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.