乳腺癌女性辅助内分泌治疗相关的心血管风险:一项基于人群的队列研究

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Iokfai Cheang, Ying Gue, Mei-Zhen Wu, Jia-Yi Huang, Qing-Wen Ren, Ziqi Chen, Yi-Kei Tse, Hang-Long Li, Yap-Hang Chan, Hung-Fat Tse, Xinli Li, Gregory Y H Lip, Kai-Hang Yiu
{"title":"乳腺癌女性辅助内分泌治疗相关的心血管风险:一项基于人群的队列研究","authors":"Iokfai Cheang, Ying Gue, Mei-Zhen Wu, Jia-Yi Huang, Qing-Wen Ren, Ziqi Chen, Yi-Kei Tse, Hang-Long Li, Yap-Hang Chan, Hung-Fat Tse, Xinli Li, Gregory Y H Lip, Kai-Hang Yiu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14280-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endocrine therapies, including tamoxifen (TMX) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are widely used in breast cancer treatment. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular risks associated with these therapies in different age groups of non-metastatic breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study using data from patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer. Patients were categorized into two ages (< 45 years and > 55 years) and then divided into groups based on whether they were newly receiving either TMX or AI. Follow-up continued until the first occurrence of a study outcome, death, or the last date of data collection (December 31, 2022). Primary outcomes were coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients < 45 years old, 2837 were newly treated with TMX (n = 2370) or AI (n = 467). During a median follow-up of 8.4 years, the incidence rates of coronary artery disease (5.6 vs. 6.6 per 1000 person-years), myocardial infarction (1.0 vs. 1.7 per 1000 person-years), ischemic stroke (1.5 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years), and cardiovascular mortality (1.4 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years) were similar between TMX and AI users, with no significant differences in hazard ratios or cumulative incidence curves. However, AI users had a higher risk of HHF (Weighted HR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.54-6.13], P = 0.001) and AF (P = 0.039) compared to TMX users. For MACE, there was a non-significant elevated risk (Weighted HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.90-2.81]), suggesting a trend toward increased risk. Among patients > 55 years old, 11,846 were newly treated with TMX (n = 6577) or AI (n = 5269). During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, AI users had a significantly increased risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, including CAD, MI, ischemic stroke, HHF, AF, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE (all P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that AIs are linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events in post-menopausal patients compared to TMX. In younger patients, TMX's protective effect on cardiovascular outcomes may be less pronounced. Further large-scale studies are required to corroborate and address limitations related to menopausal status and residual confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1063"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular risks associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Iokfai Cheang, Ying Gue, Mei-Zhen Wu, Jia-Yi Huang, Qing-Wen Ren, Ziqi Chen, Yi-Kei Tse, Hang-Long Li, Yap-Hang Chan, Hung-Fat Tse, Xinli Li, Gregory Y H Lip, Kai-Hang Yiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-14280-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endocrine therapies, including tamoxifen (TMX) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are widely used in breast cancer treatment. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular risks associated with these therapies in different age groups of non-metastatic breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study using data from patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer. Patients were categorized into two ages (< 45 years and > 55 years) and then divided into groups based on whether they were newly receiving either TMX or AI. Follow-up continued until the first occurrence of a study outcome, death, or the last date of data collection (December 31, 2022). Primary outcomes were coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among patients < 45 years old, 2837 were newly treated with TMX (n = 2370) or AI (n = 467). During a median follow-up of 8.4 years, the incidence rates of coronary artery disease (5.6 vs. 6.6 per 1000 person-years), myocardial infarction (1.0 vs. 1.7 per 1000 person-years), ischemic stroke (1.5 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years), and cardiovascular mortality (1.4 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years) were similar between TMX and AI users, with no significant differences in hazard ratios or cumulative incidence curves. However, AI users had a higher risk of HHF (Weighted HR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.54-6.13], P = 0.001) and AF (P = 0.039) compared to TMX users. For MACE, there was a non-significant elevated risk (Weighted HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.90-2.81]), suggesting a trend toward increased risk. Among patients > 55 years old, 11,846 were newly treated with TMX (n = 6577) or AI (n = 5269). During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, AI users had a significantly increased risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, including CAD, MI, ischemic stroke, HHF, AF, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE (all P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that AIs are linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events in post-menopausal patients compared to TMX. In younger patients, TMX's protective effect on cardiovascular outcomes may be less pronounced. Further large-scale studies are required to corroborate and address limitations related to menopausal status and residual confounding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210659/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14280-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14280-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内分泌疗法,包括他莫昔芬(TMX)和芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs),广泛应用于乳腺癌治疗。本研究旨在评估不同年龄组非转移性乳腺癌患者与这些治疗相关的心血管风险。方法:我们对新诊断为非转移性乳腺癌的患者进行了一项队列研究。患者被分为两个年龄(55岁),然后根据他们是否新接受TMX或AI分为组。随访持续至首次出现研究结果、死亡或最后一次数据收集日期(2022年12月31日)。主要结局是冠状动脉疾病、心肌梗死(MI)、缺血性卒中、心力衰竭(HHF)住院、心房颤动(AF)、心血管死亡率、全因死亡率和主要心血管不良事件(MACE)。结果:55岁患者中,有11,846例新接受TMX (n = 6577)或AI (n = 5269)治疗。在中位5年的随访期间,人工智能使用者的主要心血管结局风险显著增加,包括CAD、心肌梗死、缺血性卒中、HHF、AF、心血管死亡率和MACE(均为P)。结论:研究表明,与TMX相比,人工智能与绝经后患者心血管事件的风险更高。在年轻患者中,TMX对心血管结局的保护作用可能不太明显。需要进一步的大规模研究来证实和解决与绝经状态和残留混杂相关的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular risks associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Background: Endocrine therapies, including tamoxifen (TMX) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), are widely used in breast cancer treatment. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular risks associated with these therapies in different age groups of non-metastatic breast cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study using data from patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer. Patients were categorized into two ages (< 45 years and > 55 years) and then divided into groups based on whether they were newly receiving either TMX or AI. Follow-up continued until the first occurrence of a study outcome, death, or the last date of data collection (December 31, 2022). Primary outcomes were coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Results: Among patients < 45 years old, 2837 were newly treated with TMX (n = 2370) or AI (n = 467). During a median follow-up of 8.4 years, the incidence rates of coronary artery disease (5.6 vs. 6.6 per 1000 person-years), myocardial infarction (1.0 vs. 1.7 per 1000 person-years), ischemic stroke (1.5 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years), and cardiovascular mortality (1.4 vs. 1.5 per 1000 person-years) were similar between TMX and AI users, with no significant differences in hazard ratios or cumulative incidence curves. However, AI users had a higher risk of HHF (Weighted HR, 3.08 [95% CI, 1.54-6.13], P = 0.001) and AF (P = 0.039) compared to TMX users. For MACE, there was a non-significant elevated risk (Weighted HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.90-2.81]), suggesting a trend toward increased risk. Among patients > 55 years old, 11,846 were newly treated with TMX (n = 6577) or AI (n = 5269). During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, AI users had a significantly increased risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, including CAD, MI, ischemic stroke, HHF, AF, cardiovascular mortality, and MACE (all P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The study indicates that AIs are linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events in post-menopausal patients compared to TMX. In younger patients, TMX's protective effect on cardiovascular outcomes may be less pronounced. Further large-scale studies are required to corroborate and address limitations related to menopausal status and residual confounding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信