加多西酸增强MRI对亚厘米级肝细胞癌的诊断价值

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li Yang, Shengxiang Rao, Kaipu Jin, Lifang Wu, Mengsu Zeng, Ying Ding
{"title":"加多西酸增强MRI对亚厘米级肝细胞癌的诊断价值","authors":"Li Yang, Shengxiang Rao, Kaipu Jin, Lifang Wu, Mengsu Zeng, Ying Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04071-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performances of washout (WO) criteria confined to portal venous phase (PVP), extended to transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred patients (mean age, 53.4 ± 10.4 years) who were scanned with 1.5-T gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were included. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and signal intensity on PVP, TP and HBP images were evaluated. Three WO criteria were established: WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP and WO extended to the HBP.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy with 95% confidence interval were calculated for WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP or HBP, and generalized estimating equation was used to compare sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 surgically confirmed subcentimeter hepatic nodules (171 HCCs and 29 non-HCCs) were included. For solitary subcentimeter HCCs, WO extended to the TP showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than WO confined to the PVP (70.80% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001) and AFP (70.80% vs. 51.09%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.05), but no significant difference in specificity (76.19% vs. 95.24%, P > 0.05; 76.19% vs. 85.71%, P > 0.05). Extending WO to the HBP achieved significantly higher sensitivity (78.10% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.001; 78.10% vs. 70.80%, P < 0.05) and accuracy (75.32% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001; 75.32% vs. 71.52%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP, but lower specificity (57.14%% vs. 95.24%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP. The combination of AFP with WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP, or WO extended to the HBP yielded significantly higher sensitivities and accuracies compared to each MRI washout criterion alone (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WO extending to TP rather than HBP may be a preferred alternative for diagnosing subcentimeter HCC, and the supplement of AFP may improve sensitivity and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performances of adding transition and hepatobiliary phase to washout in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Li Yang, Shengxiang Rao, Kaipu Jin, Lifang Wu, Mengsu Zeng, Ying Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-025-04071-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performances of washout (WO) criteria confined to portal venous phase (PVP), extended to transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred patients (mean age, 53.4 ± 10.4 years) who were scanned with 1.5-T gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were included. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and signal intensity on PVP, TP and HBP images were evaluated. Three WO criteria were established: WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP and WO extended to the HBP.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy with 95% confidence interval were calculated for WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP or HBP, and generalized estimating equation was used to compare sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 surgically confirmed subcentimeter hepatic nodules (171 HCCs and 29 non-HCCs) were included. For solitary subcentimeter HCCs, WO extended to the TP showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than WO confined to the PVP (70.80% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001) and AFP (70.80% vs. 51.09%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.05), but no significant difference in specificity (76.19% vs. 95.24%, P > 0.05; 76.19% vs. 85.71%, P > 0.05). Extending WO to the HBP achieved significantly higher sensitivity (78.10% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.001; 78.10% vs. 70.80%, P < 0.05) and accuracy (75.32% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001; 75.32% vs. 71.52%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP, but lower specificity (57.14%% vs. 95.24%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP. The combination of AFP with WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP, or WO extended to the HBP yielded significantly higher sensitivities and accuracies compared to each MRI washout criterion alone (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WO extending to TP rather than HBP may be a preferred alternative for diagnosing subcentimeter HCC, and the supplement of AFP may improve sensitivity and accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04071-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04071-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较加多辛酸增强MRI对亚厘米肝细胞癌(HCC)的冲洗(WO)标准在门静脉期(PVP)、过渡期(TP)和肝胆期(HBP)的诊断价值。材料与方法:采用1.5 t加多辛酸增强MRI扫描的患者200例,平均年龄53.4±10.4岁。评价PVP、TP和HBP图像的动脉期高增强和信号强度。建立了三个WO标准:局限于PVP的WO,扩展到TP的WO和扩展到HBP的WO。评估:计算局限于PVP和扩展到TP或HBP的WO的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和95%置信区间的准确性,并采用广义估计方程比较敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性。结果:共纳入200例手术证实的亚厘米肝结节(hcc 171例,非hcc 29例)。对于孤立亚厘米hcc,延伸至TP的WO比局限于PVP的WO具有更高的敏感性和准确性(70.80% vs. 49.64%, P 0.05;76.19% vs. 85.71%, P < 0.05)。结论:WO扩展到TP而不是HBP可能是诊断亚厘米级HCC的首选选择,补充AFP可提高敏感性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performances of adding transition and hepatobiliary phase to washout in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performances of washout (WO) criteria confined to portal venous phase (PVP), extended to transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) for subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Materials and methods: Two hundred patients (mean age, 53.4 ± 10.4 years) who were scanned with 1.5-T gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were included. Arterial phase hyperenhancement and signal intensity on PVP, TP and HBP images were evaluated. Three WO criteria were established: WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP and WO extended to the HBP.

Assessment: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy with 95% confidence interval were calculated for WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP or HBP, and generalized estimating equation was used to compare sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy.

Results: A total of 200 surgically confirmed subcentimeter hepatic nodules (171 HCCs and 29 non-HCCs) were included. For solitary subcentimeter HCCs, WO extended to the TP showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy than WO confined to the PVP (70.80% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001) and AFP (70.80% vs. 51.09%, P < 0.05; 71.52% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.05), but no significant difference in specificity (76.19% vs. 95.24%, P > 0.05; 76.19% vs. 85.71%, P > 0.05). Extending WO to the HBP achieved significantly higher sensitivity (78.10% vs. 49.64%, P < 0.001; 78.10% vs. 70.80%, P < 0.05) and accuracy (75.32% vs. 55.70%, P < 0.001; 75.32% vs. 71.52%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP and WO extended to the TP, but lower specificity (57.14%% vs. 95.24%, P < 0.05) compared to WO confined to the PVP. The combination of AFP with WO confined to the PVP, WO extended to the TP, or WO extended to the HBP yielded significantly higher sensitivities and accuracies compared to each MRI washout criterion alone (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion: WO extending to TP rather than HBP may be a preferred alternative for diagnosing subcentimeter HCC, and the supplement of AFP may improve sensitivity and accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信