预测急诊科病人到达的预后模型:更新的系统回顾和研究议程。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert
{"title":"预测急诊科病人到达的预后模型:更新的系统回顾和研究议程。","authors":"Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic models for predicting patient arrivals in emergency departments: an updated systematic review and research agenda.\",\"authors\":\"Luka Petravić, Kaja Gril Rogina, Tit Albreht, Andreja Kukec, Janez Žibert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01250-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)正在努力应对越来越多的患者涌入。时间序列预测(TSF)是帮助各院系应对入院人数激增的方法之一。本研究的目的是对当前文献进行概述,以帮助指导未来的研究。首先,我们的目标是确定所使用的外部变量。其次,我们试图确定所使用的TSF方法及其性能。方法:我们纳入了预测患者到达急诊科的模型开发或验证研究,并使用了外部变量。我们纳入了任何预测范围和任何预测方法的研究。文献检索通过PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL和Embase数据库完成。我们提取了所用方法和变量的数据。这项研究是根据TRIPOD-SRMA指南报道的。使用PROBAST和作者自己的量表评估偏倚风险。结果:我们纳入了30项研究。我们的分析已经确定了模型中使用的10组不同的变量。通常使用天气和日历变量。我们发现了三种不同的TSF方法。然而,没有一项研究遵循报告准则,模型代码也很少发表。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要更好地报告模型开发和验证的结果,以便更好地理解创建模型中使用的外部变量的作用,以及在不同研究小组之间更统一地报告结果和创建模型的外部验证。基于我们的发现,我们还提出了该领域未来的研究议程。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic models for predicting patient arrivals in emergency departments: an updated systematic review and research agenda.

Background: Emergency departments (ED) are struggling with an increased influx of patients. One of the methods to help departments prepare for surges of admittance is time series forecasting (TSF). The aim of this study was to create an overview of current literature to help guide future research. Firstly, we aimed to identify external variables used. Secondly, we tried to identify TSF methods used and their performance.

Methods: We included model development or validation studies that were forecasting patient arrivals to the ED and used external variables. We included studies on any forecast horizon and any forecasting methodology. Literature search was done through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Embase databases. We extracted data on methods and variables used. The study is reported according to TRIPOD-SRMA guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST and authors' own dimensions.

Results: We included 30 studies. Our analysis has identified 10 different groups of variables used in models. Weather and calendar variables were commonly used. We found 3 different families of TSF methods. However, none of the studies followed reporting guidelines and model code was seldom published.

Conclusions: Our results identify the need for better reported results of model development and validation to better understand the role of external variables used in created models, as well as for more uniform reporting of results between different research groups and external validation of created models. Based on our findings, we also suggest a future research agenda for this field.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信