Rachana Suresh, Anirudh Buddhiraju, Visakha Suresh, A Lee Dellon, Vishal Hegde, Sami H Tuffaha, Ala Elhelali
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后神经瘤与术后持续疼痛。","authors":"Rachana Suresh, Anirudh Buddhiraju, Visakha Suresh, A Lee Dellon, Vishal Hegde, Sami H Tuffaha, Ala Elhelali","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent postoperative knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often an indication for revision surgery and has a multifactorial etiology. Periarticular neuromas of nerves innervating the joint, ligaments, or overlying skin are important but misdiagnosed causes of persistent knee pain following knee surgery. This study aimed to characterize the incidence and sequelae of peripheral neuromas in TKA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the TriNetX research network to identify TKA patients experiencing persistent knee pain lasting more than 3 months between 2016-2024, excluding cases with acute postoperative pain and implant-related causes, and identified patients diagnosed with neuromas. We then compared the rate of revision between patients with persistent knee pain with confirmed neuroma diagnoses and those without, and evaluated the utilization of surgical and nonsurgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 446,969 primary TKA patients, 111,533 (25.0%) experienced persistent pain, of whom 5785 (5.2%) were diagnosed with neuromas. Among those diagnosed, 19% received a diagnosis within 1 year of TKA, 25.8% between one and 3 years, and 55.2% after 3 years. Revision rates were similar in both groups (0.5% vs 0.5%). While 10.5% of neuroma patients received an intervention, only 3.6% underwent definitive surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-fourth of TKA patients have persistent knee pain not associated with joint or implant-related factors, yet only around 5% are definitively diagnosed with a neuroma, suggesting potential underdiagnosis. The high risk of nerve injury during standard TKA incisions should warrant a high index of suspicion for neuromas in patients with refractory persistent knee pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromas and Persistent Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Rachana Suresh, Anirudh Buddhiraju, Visakha Suresh, A Lee Dellon, Vishal Hegde, Sami H Tuffaha, Ala Elhelali\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persistent postoperative knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often an indication for revision surgery and has a multifactorial etiology. Periarticular neuromas of nerves innervating the joint, ligaments, or overlying skin are important but misdiagnosed causes of persistent knee pain following knee surgery. This study aimed to characterize the incidence and sequelae of peripheral neuromas in TKA patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the TriNetX research network to identify TKA patients experiencing persistent knee pain lasting more than 3 months between 2016-2024, excluding cases with acute postoperative pain and implant-related causes, and identified patients diagnosed with neuromas. We then compared the rate of revision between patients with persistent knee pain with confirmed neuroma diagnoses and those without, and evaluated the utilization of surgical and nonsurgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 446,969 primary TKA patients, 111,533 (25.0%) experienced persistent pain, of whom 5785 (5.2%) were diagnosed with neuromas. Among those diagnosed, 19% received a diagnosis within 1 year of TKA, 25.8% between one and 3 years, and 55.2% after 3 years. Revision rates were similar in both groups (0.5% vs 0.5%). While 10.5% of neuroma patients received an intervention, only 3.6% underwent definitive surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-fourth of TKA patients have persistent knee pain not associated with joint or implant-related factors, yet only around 5% are definitively diagnosed with a neuroma, suggesting potential underdiagnosis. The high risk of nerve injury during standard TKA incisions should warrant a high index of suspicion for neuromas in patients with refractory persistent knee pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)后持续的术后膝关节疼痛通常是翻修手术的指征,并且具有多因素病因。关节周围神经瘤的神经支配关节,韧带,或覆盖的皮肤是重要的,但误诊的原因持续膝关节疼痛后,膝关节手术。本研究旨在了解TKA患者周围神经瘤的发生率和后遗症。方法:我们利用TriNetX研究网络,筛选2016-2024年间持续膝关节疼痛超过3个月的TKA患者,排除术后急性疼痛和植入物相关原因的患者,并确定诊断为神经瘤的患者。然后,我们比较了确诊为神经瘤的持续性膝关节疼痛患者和未确诊为神经瘤的患者的翻修率,并评估了手术和非手术干预措施的使用情况。结果:446,969例原发性TKA患者中,111,533例(25.0%)出现持续疼痛,其中5785例(5.2%)被诊断为神经瘤。确诊患者中,19%在TKA治疗1年内确诊,25.8%在1 - 3年内确诊,55.2%在3年后确诊。两组的修正率相似(0.5% vs 0.5%)。10.5%的神经瘤患者接受了干预,只有3.6%的患者接受了明确的手术干预。结论:四分之一的TKA患者存在与关节或植入物相关因素无关的持续性膝关节疼痛,但只有约5%的患者被明确诊断为神经瘤,这表明可能存在诊断不足。在标准TKA切口中神经损伤的高风险应保证对难治性持续性膝关节疼痛患者的神经瘤高度怀疑。
Neuromas and Persistent Postoperative Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Purpose: Persistent postoperative knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often an indication for revision surgery and has a multifactorial etiology. Periarticular neuromas of nerves innervating the joint, ligaments, or overlying skin are important but misdiagnosed causes of persistent knee pain following knee surgery. This study aimed to characterize the incidence and sequelae of peripheral neuromas in TKA patients.
Methods: We utilized the TriNetX research network to identify TKA patients experiencing persistent knee pain lasting more than 3 months between 2016-2024, excluding cases with acute postoperative pain and implant-related causes, and identified patients diagnosed with neuromas. We then compared the rate of revision between patients with persistent knee pain with confirmed neuroma diagnoses and those without, and evaluated the utilization of surgical and nonsurgical interventions.
Results: Of 446,969 primary TKA patients, 111,533 (25.0%) experienced persistent pain, of whom 5785 (5.2%) were diagnosed with neuromas. Among those diagnosed, 19% received a diagnosis within 1 year of TKA, 25.8% between one and 3 years, and 55.2% after 3 years. Revision rates were similar in both groups (0.5% vs 0.5%). While 10.5% of neuroma patients received an intervention, only 3.6% underwent definitive surgical intervention.
Conclusions: One-fourth of TKA patients have persistent knee pain not associated with joint or implant-related factors, yet only around 5% are definitively diagnosed with a neuroma, suggesting potential underdiagnosis. The high risk of nerve injury during standard TKA incisions should warrant a high index of suspicion for neuromas in patients with refractory persistent knee pain.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.