规划健康项目评估的步骤:从项目逻辑到数据收集和报告计划

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Matt Thomas, Justine Summers, Sherryn Honeywood, Alyssa Fitzgerald, Donna Ambler, Kylie Falciani, Amanda Cook, Kelly Smith, Dean Bright, Michelle Lindsay, Catherine Sanford
{"title":"规划健康项目评估的步骤:从项目逻辑到数据收集和报告计划","authors":"Matt Thomas,&nbsp;Justine Summers,&nbsp;Sherryn Honeywood,&nbsp;Alyssa Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Donna Ambler,&nbsp;Kylie Falciani,&nbsp;Amanda Cook,&nbsp;Kelly Smith,&nbsp;Dean Bright,&nbsp;Michelle Lindsay,&nbsp;Catherine Sanford","doi":"10.1111/ajr.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a lack of evidence generated by health program evaluation in rural contexts [<span>1, 2</span>]. Evaluation of health programs is important for determining outcomes and impact [<span>3</span>], providing evidence for policy and funding decisions [<span>4</span>], and to drive continuous improvement of health programs that address inequalities in rural health outcomes [<span>5, 6</span>]. There are several challenges to healthcare evaluation in rural settings [<span>1, 2, 4-6</span>]. These can include resource limitations such as shortages of healthcare professionals, facilities, infrastructure, and funding, as well as geographical barriers such as vast distances and transportation issues, which may impede stakeholder engagement and data collection processes. Program evaluation must be tailored to the unique cultural and social contexts of rural communities. For example, qualitative data from interviews, video and audio recordings, and written feedback can provide useful evidence of outcomes and experiences of receiving care but may not be deemed appropriate in some communities. The views and support of Elders and other community leaders can guide the design and implementation of culturally safe and welcoming program evaluation activity. While a detailed explanation of these issues and management strategies is beyond the scope of this article, suggestions for approaching some of these issues are noted, and more information about managing these issues can be found.</p><p>Given these challenges, rural clinicians and health program managers are often well placed to lead the evaluation of health programs. However, they may not be familiar with evaluation methods. This article provides an overview of a simple step-by-step process for planning health program evaluation and demonstrates a method for developing data collection and reporting plans from a program logic document.</p><p>Evaluation of health programs is recognised as essential for providing evidence that can ultimately address inequality of health outcomes in rural communities [<span>4-6</span>]. However, this evidence is lacking for many rural health services [<span>1, 2</span>]. Our paper shares a simple introduction to operationalising a data collection and reporting plan from program logic. This method has been successfully implemented across several rural-based health and wellbeing programs, including a multidisciplinary paediatric outreach clinic, peer navigator, diabetes mentoring, Sense rugby (a rugby skill program for children with disability), as well as a school-based reading program. It may be useful to leaders in rural health who are considering program evaluation. Future research will evaluate and further develop this method with a focus on rural health programs.</p><p><b>Matt Thomas:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, methodology. <b>Justine Summers:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Sherryn Honeywood:</b> writing – review and editing, methodology. <b>Alyssa Fitzgerald:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Donna Ambler:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Kylie Falciani:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Amanda Cook:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Kelly Smith:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Dean Bright:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Michelle Lindsay:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Catherine Sanford:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steps for Planning Health Program Evaluations: From Program Logic to Data Collection and Reporting Plans\",\"authors\":\"Matt Thomas,&nbsp;Justine Summers,&nbsp;Sherryn Honeywood,&nbsp;Alyssa Fitzgerald,&nbsp;Donna Ambler,&nbsp;Kylie Falciani,&nbsp;Amanda Cook,&nbsp;Kelly Smith,&nbsp;Dean Bright,&nbsp;Michelle Lindsay,&nbsp;Catherine Sanford\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.70068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a lack of evidence generated by health program evaluation in rural contexts [<span>1, 2</span>]. Evaluation of health programs is important for determining outcomes and impact [<span>3</span>], providing evidence for policy and funding decisions [<span>4</span>], and to drive continuous improvement of health programs that address inequalities in rural health outcomes [<span>5, 6</span>]. There are several challenges to healthcare evaluation in rural settings [<span>1, 2, 4-6</span>]. These can include resource limitations such as shortages of healthcare professionals, facilities, infrastructure, and funding, as well as geographical barriers such as vast distances and transportation issues, which may impede stakeholder engagement and data collection processes. Program evaluation must be tailored to the unique cultural and social contexts of rural communities. For example, qualitative data from interviews, video and audio recordings, and written feedback can provide useful evidence of outcomes and experiences of receiving care but may not be deemed appropriate in some communities. The views and support of Elders and other community leaders can guide the design and implementation of culturally safe and welcoming program evaluation activity. While a detailed explanation of these issues and management strategies is beyond the scope of this article, suggestions for approaching some of these issues are noted, and more information about managing these issues can be found.</p><p>Given these challenges, rural clinicians and health program managers are often well placed to lead the evaluation of health programs. However, they may not be familiar with evaluation methods. This article provides an overview of a simple step-by-step process for planning health program evaluation and demonstrates a method for developing data collection and reporting plans from a program logic document.</p><p>Evaluation of health programs is recognised as essential for providing evidence that can ultimately address inequality of health outcomes in rural communities [<span>4-6</span>]. However, this evidence is lacking for many rural health services [<span>1, 2</span>]. Our paper shares a simple introduction to operationalising a data collection and reporting plan from program logic. This method has been successfully implemented across several rural-based health and wellbeing programs, including a multidisciplinary paediatric outreach clinic, peer navigator, diabetes mentoring, Sense rugby (a rugby skill program for children with disability), as well as a school-based reading program. It may be useful to leaders in rural health who are considering program evaluation. Future research will evaluate and further develop this method with a focus on rural health programs.</p><p><b>Matt Thomas:</b> conceptualization, writing – original draft, methodology. <b>Justine Summers:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Sherryn Honeywood:</b> writing – review and editing, methodology. <b>Alyssa Fitzgerald:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Donna Ambler:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Kylie Falciani:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Amanda Cook:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Kelly Smith:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Dean Bright:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Michelle Lindsay:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing. <b>Catherine Sanford:</b> methodology, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.70068\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.70068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村地区的卫生规划评估缺乏证据[1,2]。卫生项目评估对于确定结果和影响[3],为政策和资金决策b[4]提供证据,以及推动卫生项目的持续改进,解决农村卫生结果不平等问题至关重要[5,6]。农村地区的医疗保健评估面临几个挑战[1,2,4 -6]。这些障碍可能包括资源限制,如医疗保健专业人员、设施、基础设施和资金短缺,以及地理障碍,如距离遥远和运输问题,这些障碍可能阻碍利益攸关方的参与和数据收集过程。项目评估必须适应农村社区独特的文化和社会环境。例如,来自访谈、视频和音频记录以及书面反馈的定性数据可以提供有用的证据,证明获得护理的结果和经验,但在某些社区可能被认为不合适。长老和其他社区领导人的意见和支持可以指导设计和实施文化安全和欢迎的项目评估活动。虽然对这些问题和管理策略的详细解释超出了本文的范围,但本文指出了处理其中一些问题的建议,并且可以找到有关管理这些问题的更多信息。考虑到这些挑战,农村临床医生和卫生项目经理通常能够很好地领导卫生项目的评估。然而,他们可能不熟悉评估方法。本文概述了规划健康项目评估的简单分步过程,并演示了从项目逻辑文档开发数据收集和报告计划的方法。人们认为,卫生项目评估对于提供证据,最终解决农村社区卫生结果不平等问题至关重要[4-6]。然而,许多农村卫生服务缺乏这方面的证据[1,2]。我们的论文分享了从程序逻辑操作数据收集和报告计划的简单介绍。这一方法已成功地应用于若干以农村为基础的健康和福利项目,包括多学科儿科外展诊所、同伴导览、糖尿病辅导、Sense rugby(面向残疾儿童的橄榄球技能项目)以及基于学校的阅读项目。它可能对正在考虑项目评价的农村卫生领导有用。未来的研究将评估和进一步发展这种方法,重点放在农村卫生项目上。马特托马斯:概念化,写作-原始草案,方法论。贾斯汀·萨默斯:写作-评论和编辑。谢琳·霍尼伍德:写作-评论和编辑,方法论。艾丽莎·菲茨杰拉德:方法论,写作-评论和编辑。唐娜·安布勒:方法论、写作、评论和编辑。Kylie Falciani:方法论,写作-评论和编辑。阿曼达库克:方法论,写作-审查和编辑。凯利史密斯:方法论,写作-审查和编辑。迪恩·布莱特:方法论、写作、评论和编辑。米歇尔·林赛:方法论、写作、评论和编辑。凯瑟琳·桑福德:方法论,写作-评论和编辑。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Steps for Planning Health Program Evaluations: From Program Logic to Data Collection and Reporting Plans

Steps for Planning Health Program Evaluations: From Program Logic to Data Collection and Reporting Plans

There is a lack of evidence generated by health program evaluation in rural contexts [1, 2]. Evaluation of health programs is important for determining outcomes and impact [3], providing evidence for policy and funding decisions [4], and to drive continuous improvement of health programs that address inequalities in rural health outcomes [5, 6]. There are several challenges to healthcare evaluation in rural settings [1, 2, 4-6]. These can include resource limitations such as shortages of healthcare professionals, facilities, infrastructure, and funding, as well as geographical barriers such as vast distances and transportation issues, which may impede stakeholder engagement and data collection processes. Program evaluation must be tailored to the unique cultural and social contexts of rural communities. For example, qualitative data from interviews, video and audio recordings, and written feedback can provide useful evidence of outcomes and experiences of receiving care but may not be deemed appropriate in some communities. The views and support of Elders and other community leaders can guide the design and implementation of culturally safe and welcoming program evaluation activity. While a detailed explanation of these issues and management strategies is beyond the scope of this article, suggestions for approaching some of these issues are noted, and more information about managing these issues can be found.

Given these challenges, rural clinicians and health program managers are often well placed to lead the evaluation of health programs. However, they may not be familiar with evaluation methods. This article provides an overview of a simple step-by-step process for planning health program evaluation and demonstrates a method for developing data collection and reporting plans from a program logic document.

Evaluation of health programs is recognised as essential for providing evidence that can ultimately address inequality of health outcomes in rural communities [4-6]. However, this evidence is lacking for many rural health services [1, 2]. Our paper shares a simple introduction to operationalising a data collection and reporting plan from program logic. This method has been successfully implemented across several rural-based health and wellbeing programs, including a multidisciplinary paediatric outreach clinic, peer navigator, diabetes mentoring, Sense rugby (a rugby skill program for children with disability), as well as a school-based reading program. It may be useful to leaders in rural health who are considering program evaluation. Future research will evaluate and further develop this method with a focus on rural health programs.

Matt Thomas: conceptualization, writing – original draft, methodology. Justine Summers: writing – review and editing. Sherryn Honeywood: writing – review and editing, methodology. Alyssa Fitzgerald: methodology, writing – review and editing. Donna Ambler: methodology, writing – review and editing. Kylie Falciani: methodology, writing – review and editing. Amanda Cook: methodology, writing – review and editing. Kelly Smith: methodology, writing – review and editing. Dean Bright: methodology, writing – review and editing. Michelle Lindsay: methodology, writing – review and editing. Catherine Sanford: methodology, writing – review and editing.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信