游离睾酮假说之争:有用的工具还是误导的海市蜃楼?

IF 5.1
Bradley D Anawalt, David J Handelsman
{"title":"游离睾酮假说之争:有用的工具还是误导的海市蜃楼?","authors":"Bradley D Anawalt, David J Handelsman","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this debate, two clinicians discuss the merits and demerits of the free testosterone hypothesis. Although most clinical guidelines recommend the measurement of free testosterone in the evaluation for male hypogonadism (at least in men with suspected low serum sex hormone binding globulin), there remains controversy about underlying hypothesis that serum free testosterone is a significant contributor to androgen effect. In this debate, Dr. Anawalt presents evidence to support the free testosterone hypothesis and advocates for the usefulness of accurate assessment of free testosterone in the evaluation of male hypogonadism. Dr. Handelsman argues that the evidence is unconvincing, the hypothesis is flawed and biologically invalid, and free testosterone cannot be accurately assessed in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debate about the Free Testosterone Hypothesis: Useful Tool or Misguided Mirage?\",\"authors\":\"Bradley D Anawalt, David J Handelsman\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this debate, two clinicians discuss the merits and demerits of the free testosterone hypothesis. Although most clinical guidelines recommend the measurement of free testosterone in the evaluation for male hypogonadism (at least in men with suspected low serum sex hormone binding globulin), there remains controversy about underlying hypothesis that serum free testosterone is a significant contributor to androgen effect. In this debate, Dr. Anawalt presents evidence to support the free testosterone hypothesis and advocates for the usefulness of accurate assessment of free testosterone in the evaluation of male hypogonadism. Dr. Handelsman argues that the evidence is unconvincing, the hypothesis is flawed and biologically invalid, and free testosterone cannot be accurately assessed in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf370\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这场辩论中,两位临床医生讨论了游离睾酮假说的优点和缺点。尽管大多数临床指南建议在评估男性性腺功能减退(至少在怀疑血清性激素结合球蛋白低的男性中)时测量游离睾酮,但关于血清游离睾酮是雄激素效应的重要因素这一潜在假设仍存在争议。在这场辩论中,Anawalt博士提出了支持游离睾酮假说的证据,并倡导准确评估游离睾酮对男性性腺功能减退的有用性。汉德尔斯曼博士认为,证据不令人信服,假设有缺陷,在生物学上无效,游离睾酮在临床实践中无法准确评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debate about the Free Testosterone Hypothesis: Useful Tool or Misguided Mirage?

In this debate, two clinicians discuss the merits and demerits of the free testosterone hypothesis. Although most clinical guidelines recommend the measurement of free testosterone in the evaluation for male hypogonadism (at least in men with suspected low serum sex hormone binding globulin), there remains controversy about underlying hypothesis that serum free testosterone is a significant contributor to androgen effect. In this debate, Dr. Anawalt presents evidence to support the free testosterone hypothesis and advocates for the usefulness of accurate assessment of free testosterone in the evaluation of male hypogonadism. Dr. Handelsman argues that the evidence is unconvincing, the hypothesis is flawed and biologically invalid, and free testosterone cannot be accurately assessed in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信