老年友好护理和住院老年认知障碍患者的活动能力:一项可行性质量改进倡议。

IF 4.5
Jasmine K Vickers, Richard E Kennedy, Shari Harrell, David H James, Katrina Booth, Emily Simmons, Cynthia J Brown, Kellie L Flood
{"title":"老年友好护理和住院老年认知障碍患者的活动能力:一项可行性质量改进倡议。","authors":"Jasmine K Vickers, Richard E Kennedy, Shari Harrell, David H James, Katrina Booth, Emily Simmons, Cynthia J Brown, Kellie L Flood","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) have an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units were developed to reduce functional decline in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>We developed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to disseminate ACE care processes to non-ACE units, converting them into \"Virtual ACE\" units. The aim of this evaluation is to examine the impact of this intervention on the mobilization of patients with CI.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Older adults with CI admitted to a study unit (ACE Unit or seven Virtual ACE units).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pre/post-intervention evaluation of the proportion of informed respondents answering \"yes\" to the Acute Care Mobility Assessment (ACMA) interview item: \"In the past 24 hours did the patient move from the bed to the chair, walk in the room, walk in the hallway?\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in patient demographics, baseline activities of daily living (ADL) performance, history of falls, or consults to physical or occupational therapy between the total pre- (n = 56) versus post- (n = 135) intervention cohorts. The ACE Unit patients were significantly older (82.9 ± 7.5 vs. 75.5 ± 7.7 years, p < 0.05) and significantly more impaired in baseline ADL performance based on Katz Index scores (6.4 ± 4.4 vs. 8.5 ± 4.4, p < 0.05) compared to patients on Virtual ACE units. The proportion of patients with CI reported on ACMA interview to have mobilized from bed to chair (29% vs. 51%, p < 0.05) and ambulated into the hallway (13% vs. 27%, p < 0.05) in the prior 24 hours significantly increased post-intervention. Similar benefits were seen in the ACE and Virtual ACE patients evaluated separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This QI intervention demonstrated that disseminating ACE care processes to non-ACE units was associated with increased mobilization of hospitalized older adults with CI. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-Friendly Care and Mobility in Hospitalized Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Feasibility Quality Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine K Vickers, Richard E Kennedy, Shari Harrell, David H James, Katrina Booth, Emily Simmons, Cynthia J Brown, Kellie L Flood\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) have an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units were developed to reduce functional decline in hospitalized older adults.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>We developed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to disseminate ACE care processes to non-ACE units, converting them into \\\"Virtual ACE\\\" units. The aim of this evaluation is to examine the impact of this intervention on the mobilization of patients with CI.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Older adults with CI admitted to a study unit (ACE Unit or seven Virtual ACE units).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pre/post-intervention evaluation of the proportion of informed respondents answering \\\"yes\\\" to the Acute Care Mobility Assessment (ACMA) interview item: \\\"In the past 24 hours did the patient move from the bed to the chair, walk in the room, walk in the hallway?\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in patient demographics, baseline activities of daily living (ADL) performance, history of falls, or consults to physical or occupational therapy between the total pre- (n = 56) versus post- (n = 135) intervention cohorts. The ACE Unit patients were significantly older (82.9 ± 7.5 vs. 75.5 ± 7.7 years, p < 0.05) and significantly more impaired in baseline ADL performance based on Katz Index scores (6.4 ± 4.4 vs. 8.5 ± 4.4, p < 0.05) compared to patients on Virtual ACE units. The proportion of patients with CI reported on ACMA interview to have mobilized from bed to chair (29% vs. 51%, p < 0.05) and ambulated into the hallway (13% vs. 27%, p < 0.05) in the prior 24 hours significantly increased post-intervention. Similar benefits were seen in the ACE and Virtual ACE patients evaluated separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This QI intervention demonstrated that disseminating ACE care processes to non-ACE units was associated with increased mobilization of hospitalized older adults with CI. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:住院的老年人认知功能障碍(CI)发生不良结局的风险增加。老年人急性护理(ACE)单位的发展是为了减少住院老年人的功能下降。干预措施:我们制定了一项质量改进(QI)计划,将ACE护理流程推广到非ACE单位,将其转化为“虚拟ACE”单位。本评估的目的是检查这种干预对CI患者活动的影响。人群:入住研究单位(ACE单位或七个虚拟ACE单位)的CI老年人。方法:我们对急性护理活动能力评估(ACMA)访谈项目中回答“是”的知情受访者比例进行干预前/干预后评估:“在过去24小时内,患者是否从床上移动到椅子上,在房间里行走,在走廊上行走?”结果:在干预前(n = 56)和干预后(n = 135)的总队列中,患者人口统计学、基线日常生活活动(ADL)表现、跌倒史或物理或职业治疗咨询均无显著差异。结论:QI干预表明,将ACE护理过程传播到非ACE单位与住院的CI老年患者的活动增加有关。需要更大样本量的研究来证实研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-Friendly Care and Mobility in Hospitalized Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Feasibility Quality Improvement Initiative.

Background: Hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment (CI) have an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Units were developed to reduce functional decline in hospitalized older adults.

Intervention: We developed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to disseminate ACE care processes to non-ACE units, converting them into "Virtual ACE" units. The aim of this evaluation is to examine the impact of this intervention on the mobilization of patients with CI.

Population: Older adults with CI admitted to a study unit (ACE Unit or seven Virtual ACE units).

Methods: We conducted a pre/post-intervention evaluation of the proportion of informed respondents answering "yes" to the Acute Care Mobility Assessment (ACMA) interview item: "In the past 24 hours did the patient move from the bed to the chair, walk in the room, walk in the hallway?"

Results: There were no significant differences in patient demographics, baseline activities of daily living (ADL) performance, history of falls, or consults to physical or occupational therapy between the total pre- (n = 56) versus post- (n = 135) intervention cohorts. The ACE Unit patients were significantly older (82.9 ± 7.5 vs. 75.5 ± 7.7 years, p < 0.05) and significantly more impaired in baseline ADL performance based on Katz Index scores (6.4 ± 4.4 vs. 8.5 ± 4.4, p < 0.05) compared to patients on Virtual ACE units. The proportion of patients with CI reported on ACMA interview to have mobilized from bed to chair (29% vs. 51%, p < 0.05) and ambulated into the hallway (13% vs. 27%, p < 0.05) in the prior 24 hours significantly increased post-intervention. Similar benefits were seen in the ACE and Virtual ACE patients evaluated separately.

Conclusion: This QI intervention demonstrated that disseminating ACE care processes to non-ACE units was associated with increased mobilization of hospitalized older adults with CI. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信