富血小板血浆和类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的比较疗效:评估疼痛缓解和功能恢复。

IF 2.2
Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-29 DOI:10.1177/10711007251346784
Ömer Faruk Bucak, Eser Kalaoglu, Mucahit Atasoy, Evrim Coskun
{"title":"富血小板血浆和类固醇注射治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的比较疗效:评估疼痛缓解和功能恢复。","authors":"Ömer Faruk Bucak, Eser Kalaoglu, Mucahit Atasoy, Evrim Coskun","doi":"10.1177/10711007251346784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a prevalent cause of heel pain, often refractory to conservative treatments. Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are frequently used for symptom relief but may provide only transient benefits and are associated with potential adverse effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as an alternative because of its regenerative properties. This study compares the effectiveness of PRP injections (n = 75) and CSI (n = 77) in reducing pain and improving function over six months in patients with CPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 152 patients diagnosed with CPF who received ultrasound-guided injection therapy at a tertiary university hospital between September 2021 and September 2024. Patients were divided into CSI (n = 77) and PRP injection (n = 75). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and functional status was assessed with the Foot Function Index (FFI). Evaluations were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postinjection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, VAS (<i>P</i> = .449) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .462) scores were comparable between groups. At 1 month, no significant differences were found for VAS (<i>P</i> = .368) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .392). At 3 months, VAS (<i>P</i> = .586) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .578) scores remained similar. At 6 months, PRP showed significantly lower VAS scores (1.98 ± 0.35) compared with corticosteroids (2.79 ± 1.13; <i>P</i> < .001); however, the difference did not exceed the MCID threshold (0.9 cm), suggesting limited clinical significance. Conversely, FFI scores improved more in the PRP group (22.3 ± 4.1) than in the corticosteroid group (29.8 ± 5.5; <i>P</i> < .001), exceeding the MCID threshold (7 points), confirming clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections were associated with superior 6-month functional improvement over corticosteroids in CPF, with statistically significant gains that met the MCID threshold. Although both treatments were effective in the short term, only functional improvements reached clinical significance. These findings support PRP's role in providing a modest functional advantage and highlight the need for future trials to optimize injection protocols and assess long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"987-995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Steroid Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Evaluating Pain Relief and Functional Recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Faruk Bucak, Eser Kalaoglu, Mucahit Atasoy, Evrim Coskun\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10711007251346784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a prevalent cause of heel pain, often refractory to conservative treatments. Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are frequently used for symptom relief but may provide only transient benefits and are associated with potential adverse effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as an alternative because of its regenerative properties. This study compares the effectiveness of PRP injections (n = 75) and CSI (n = 77) in reducing pain and improving function over six months in patients with CPF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 152 patients diagnosed with CPF who received ultrasound-guided injection therapy at a tertiary university hospital between September 2021 and September 2024. Patients were divided into CSI (n = 77) and PRP injection (n = 75). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and functional status was assessed with the Foot Function Index (FFI). Evaluations were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postinjection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, VAS (<i>P</i> = .449) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .462) scores were comparable between groups. At 1 month, no significant differences were found for VAS (<i>P</i> = .368) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .392). At 3 months, VAS (<i>P</i> = .586) and FFI (<i>P</i> = .578) scores remained similar. At 6 months, PRP showed significantly lower VAS scores (1.98 ± 0.35) compared with corticosteroids (2.79 ± 1.13; <i>P</i> < .001); however, the difference did not exceed the MCID threshold (0.9 cm), suggesting limited clinical significance. Conversely, FFI scores improved more in the PRP group (22.3 ± 4.1) than in the corticosteroid group (29.8 ± 5.5; <i>P</i> < .001), exceeding the MCID threshold (7 points), confirming clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections were associated with superior 6-month functional improvement over corticosteroids in CPF, with statistically significant gains that met the MCID threshold. Although both treatments were effective in the short term, only functional improvements reached clinical significance. These findings support PRP's role in providing a modest functional advantage and highlight the need for future trials to optimize injection protocols and assess long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"987-995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251346784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251346784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性足底筋膜炎(CPF)是一种常见的足跟疼痛的原因,通常难以保守治疗。皮质类固醇注射(CSIs)经常用于缓解症状,但可能只提供短暂的益处,并伴有潜在的不良反应。富血小板血浆(PRP)因其再生特性而受到广泛关注。本研究比较了PRP注射(n = 75)和CSI (n = 77)在CPF患者6个月内减轻疼痛和改善功能的有效性。方法:对2021年9月至2024年9月在某三级大学附属医院接受超声引导注射治疗的152例CPF患者进行回顾性队列研究。患者分为CSI组(n = 77)和PRP注射组(n = 75)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度,采用足功能指数(FFI)评估功能状态。在基线和注射后1、3和6个月进行评估。结果:在基线时,两组间VAS (P = .449)和FFI (P = .462)评分具有可比性。1个月时,两组VAS (P = .368)和FFI (P = .392)无显著差异。3个月时,VAS (P = .586)和FFI (P = .578)评分保持相似。6个月时,PRP组VAS评分(1.98±0.35)明显低于皮质类固醇组(2.79±1.13;结论:与皮质类固醇相比,PRP注射与CPF患者6个月的功能改善相关,具有统计学意义,达到了MCID阈值。虽然两种治疗方法在短期内都有效,但只有功能改善才具有临床意义。这些发现支持了PRP在提供适度功能优势方面的作用,并强调了未来试验优化注射方案和评估长期结果的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Steroid Injections in Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: Evaluating Pain Relief and Functional Recovery.

Background: Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is a prevalent cause of heel pain, often refractory to conservative treatments. Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are frequently used for symptom relief but may provide only transient benefits and are associated with potential adverse effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as an alternative because of its regenerative properties. This study compares the effectiveness of PRP injections (n = 75) and CSI (n = 77) in reducing pain and improving function over six months in patients with CPF.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 152 patients diagnosed with CPF who received ultrasound-guided injection therapy at a tertiary university hospital between September 2021 and September 2024. Patients were divided into CSI (n = 77) and PRP injection (n = 75). Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), and functional status was assessed with the Foot Function Index (FFI). Evaluations were performed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months postinjection.

Results: At baseline, VAS (P = .449) and FFI (P = .462) scores were comparable between groups. At 1 month, no significant differences were found for VAS (P = .368) and FFI (P = .392). At 3 months, VAS (P = .586) and FFI (P = .578) scores remained similar. At 6 months, PRP showed significantly lower VAS scores (1.98 ± 0.35) compared with corticosteroids (2.79 ± 1.13; P < .001); however, the difference did not exceed the MCID threshold (0.9 cm), suggesting limited clinical significance. Conversely, FFI scores improved more in the PRP group (22.3 ± 4.1) than in the corticosteroid group (29.8 ± 5.5; P < .001), exceeding the MCID threshold (7 points), confirming clinical relevance.

Conclusion: PRP injections were associated with superior 6-month functional improvement over corticosteroids in CPF, with statistically significant gains that met the MCID threshold. Although both treatments were effective in the short term, only functional improvements reached clinical significance. These findings support PRP's role in providing a modest functional advantage and highlight the need for future trials to optimize injection protocols and assess long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信