磷酸钙与自体颅骨成形术在儿科人群中的应用。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
L.L. Verhoef , B. Gareb , J.M.C. van Dijk , R.R.M. Bos
{"title":"磷酸钙与自体颅骨成形术在儿科人群中的应用。","authors":"L.L. Verhoef ,&nbsp;B. Gareb ,&nbsp;J.M.C. van Dijk ,&nbsp;R.R.M. Bos","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Persistent skull defects due to trauma, tumors, or neurosurgical procedures often necessitate cranioplasty. Autologous bone flaps are the gold standard but have a high risk of complications in pediatric cases, especially bone flap resorption. This study evaluated alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) versus autologous cranioplasties, aiming to identify the ideal material for pediatric cranioplasties.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of cranioplasties in pediatric patients with large cranial defects operated between 1995 and 2021 was conducted. Survival times of autologous and alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) cranioplasties were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort included 22 cranioplasties (11 autologous, 11 alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™)). Autologous cranioplasties demonstrated 63,6 % failure rate versus 9,1 % in the alloplastic group. Mean survival time was significantly longer for alloplastic - (67.61 ± 7.96 months (95 % CI [52.00; 83.21])) compared to autologous cranioplasties (32.75 ± 13.20 months (95 % CI [6.88; 58.61])) (p = 0.035).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) demonstrated a significantly longer survival time compared to autologous cranioplasties. The findings suggest that HA-βTCP (TricOs™) offers a superior alternative in reducing risk of implant failure, potentially addressing the challenges of bone flap resorption in a pediatric population. Additional studies are warranted to endorse these retrospective findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"53 9","pages":"Pages 1481-1486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calcium phosphate vs. autologous cranioplasty in a pediatric population\",\"authors\":\"L.L. Verhoef ,&nbsp;B. Gareb ,&nbsp;J.M.C. van Dijk ,&nbsp;R.R.M. Bos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Persistent skull defects due to trauma, tumors, or neurosurgical procedures often necessitate cranioplasty. Autologous bone flaps are the gold standard but have a high risk of complications in pediatric cases, especially bone flap resorption. This study evaluated alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) versus autologous cranioplasties, aiming to identify the ideal material for pediatric cranioplasties.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of cranioplasties in pediatric patients with large cranial defects operated between 1995 and 2021 was conducted. Survival times of autologous and alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) cranioplasties were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort included 22 cranioplasties (11 autologous, 11 alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™)). Autologous cranioplasties demonstrated 63,6 % failure rate versus 9,1 % in the alloplastic group. Mean survival time was significantly longer for alloplastic - (67.61 ± 7.96 months (95 % CI [52.00; 83.21])) compared to autologous cranioplasties (32.75 ± 13.20 months (95 % CI [6.88; 58.61])) (p = 0.035).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) demonstrated a significantly longer survival time compared to autologous cranioplasties. The findings suggest that HA-βTCP (TricOs™) offers a superior alternative in reducing risk of implant failure, potentially addressing the challenges of bone flap resorption in a pediatric population. Additional studies are warranted to endorse these retrospective findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"53 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1481-1486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518225001842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518225001842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:由于创伤、肿瘤或神经外科手术导致的颅骨缺损通常需要颅骨成形术。自体骨瓣是金标准,但在儿童病例中有很高的并发症风险,特别是骨瓣吸收。本研究评估同种异体HA-βTCP (TricOs™)与自体颅骨成形术,旨在确定儿童颅骨成形术的理想材料。材料与方法:回顾性分析1995年至2021年收治的小儿大颅骨缺损颅骨成形术患者。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和log-rank检验比较自体和同种异体HA-βTCP (TricOs™)颅骨成形术的生存时间。结果:该队列包括22例颅骨成形术(11例自体,11例异体HA-βTCP (TricOs™))。自体颅骨成形术的失败率为63.6%,而同种异体成形术的失败率为9.1%。同种异体移植组的平均生存时间明显延长,为(67.61±7.96个月)(95% CI [52.00;83.21]))与自体颅骨成形术(32.75±13.20个月)相比(95% CI [6.88;58.61])) (p = 0.035)。结论:与自体颅骨成形术相比,同种异体HA-βTCP (TricOs™)的存活时间明显更长。研究结果表明,HA-βTCP (TricOs™)在降低种植体失败风险方面提供了一种优越的替代方案,可能解决儿科人群骨皮瓣吸收的挑战。有必要进行更多的研究来支持这些回顾性发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calcium phosphate vs. autologous cranioplasty in a pediatric population

Background and objective

Persistent skull defects due to trauma, tumors, or neurosurgical procedures often necessitate cranioplasty. Autologous bone flaps are the gold standard but have a high risk of complications in pediatric cases, especially bone flap resorption. This study evaluated alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) versus autologous cranioplasties, aiming to identify the ideal material for pediatric cranioplasties.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis of cranioplasties in pediatric patients with large cranial defects operated between 1995 and 2021 was conducted. Survival times of autologous and alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) cranioplasties were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test.

Results

The cohort included 22 cranioplasties (11 autologous, 11 alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™)). Autologous cranioplasties demonstrated 63,6 % failure rate versus 9,1 % in the alloplastic group. Mean survival time was significantly longer for alloplastic - (67.61 ± 7.96 months (95 % CI [52.00; 83.21])) compared to autologous cranioplasties (32.75 ± 13.20 months (95 % CI [6.88; 58.61])) (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

Alloplastic HA-βTCP (TricOs™) demonstrated a significantly longer survival time compared to autologous cranioplasties. The findings suggest that HA-βTCP (TricOs™) offers a superior alternative in reducing risk of implant failure, potentially addressing the challenges of bone flap resorption in a pediatric population. Additional studies are warranted to endorse these retrospective findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信