非阻塞性食管吞咽困难的现实管理:一项前瞻性多中心葡萄牙队列分析。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-06-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251345340
Raquel R Mendes, José Pedro Rodrigues, Inês Simão, Helena Lima, Tiago Guedes, Sílvia Barrias, Mara Sarmento Costa, Paulo Souto, João Carlos Silva, João Correia, Bárbara Morão, Joana Revés, Carina Leal, José Dias Curto, Rui Tato Marinho, Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva
{"title":"非阻塞性食管吞咽困难的现实管理:一项前瞻性多中心葡萄牙队列分析。","authors":"Raquel R Mendes, José Pedro Rodrigues, Inês Simão, Helena Lima, Tiago Guedes, Sílvia Barrias, Mara Sarmento Costa, Paulo Souto, João Carlos Silva, João Correia, Bárbara Morão, Joana Revés, Carina Leal, José Dias Curto, Rui Tato Marinho, Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva","doi":"10.1177/17562848251345340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia (NOD) is a common benign condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Management requires a motility-focused approach and consideration for concomitant comorbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux, visceral hypersensitivity, and psychological factors. Currently, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow disorders have the most studied and effective treatments. Data on patient-reported dysphagia and quality of life in this population, and their evolution over time and treatment, are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the real-world management and behavior of NOD, focusing on motility profiles and the implementation of specific treatments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a multicenter prospective observational study that follows the management and evolution of NOD in a Portuguese cohort for 6 months, focusing on dysphagia and quality of life, to evaluate its clinical behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysphagia and quality of life were assessed in 195 patients using validated patient-reported questionnaires at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 195 patients, 61% (<i>n</i> = 119) were female, with a mean age of 61 (SD 15) years. According to Chicago classification 4.0, 32.3% (<i>n</i> = 63) had EGJ outflow disorders, 12.8% (<i>n</i> = 25) spastic disorders, 16.4% (<i>n</i> = 32) hypomotile disorders, 35.9% (<i>n</i> = 70) normal motility, and 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 5) were inconclusive. At baseline, the mean PROMIS Gastrointestinal Disrupted Swallowing (PDS) T-score, EQ-5D-3L, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were 61.7 (SD 7.4), 0.61 (SD 0.26), and 69 (SD 18), respectively. Overall, at 6 months, there were significant improvements in the Eckardt, PDS, and EQ-5D-3L scores, with no difference in VAS. In EGJ disorders, myotomy significantly improved all measurements. In the remaining subgroups, a favorable evolution of dysphagia was observed, without differences between treated and untreated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NOD tends to follow a benign course. Apart from achalasia, which has the most defined treatments with documented benefits, decisions for the remaining motility profiles should follow a comprehensive and personalized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251345340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel R Mendes, José Pedro Rodrigues, Inês Simão, Helena Lima, Tiago Guedes, Sílvia Barrias, Mara Sarmento Costa, Paulo Souto, João Carlos Silva, João Correia, Bárbara Morão, Joana Revés, Carina Leal, José Dias Curto, Rui Tato Marinho, Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848251345340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia (NOD) is a common benign condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Management requires a motility-focused approach and consideration for concomitant comorbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux, visceral hypersensitivity, and psychological factors. Currently, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow disorders have the most studied and effective treatments. Data on patient-reported dysphagia and quality of life in this population, and their evolution over time and treatment, are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the real-world management and behavior of NOD, focusing on motility profiles and the implementation of specific treatments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a multicenter prospective observational study that follows the management and evolution of NOD in a Portuguese cohort for 6 months, focusing on dysphagia and quality of life, to evaluate its clinical behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysphagia and quality of life were assessed in 195 patients using validated patient-reported questionnaires at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 195 patients, 61% (<i>n</i> = 119) were female, with a mean age of 61 (SD 15) years. According to Chicago classification 4.0, 32.3% (<i>n</i> = 63) had EGJ outflow disorders, 12.8% (<i>n</i> = 25) spastic disorders, 16.4% (<i>n</i> = 32) hypomotile disorders, 35.9% (<i>n</i> = 70) normal motility, and 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 5) were inconclusive. At baseline, the mean PROMIS Gastrointestinal Disrupted Swallowing (PDS) T-score, EQ-5D-3L, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were 61.7 (SD 7.4), 0.61 (SD 0.26), and 69 (SD 18), respectively. Overall, at 6 months, there were significant improvements in the Eckardt, PDS, and EQ-5D-3L scores, with no difference in VAS. In EGJ disorders, myotomy significantly improved all measurements. In the remaining subgroups, a favorable evolution of dysphagia was observed, without differences between treated and untreated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NOD tends to follow a benign course. Apart from achalasia, which has the most defined treatments with documented benefits, decisions for the remaining motility profiles should follow a comprehensive and personalized approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"17562848251345340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251345340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251345340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非阻塞性食管吞咽困难(NOD)是一种常见的良性疾病,显著影响生活质量。治疗需要以运动为重点的方法,并考虑伴随的合并症,如胃食管反流、内脏过敏和心理因素。目前,食管胃交界(EGJ)流出性疾病是研究最多和最有效的治疗方法。患者报告的吞咽困难和生活质量的数据,以及它们随时间和治疗的演变,都是稀缺的。目的:本研究旨在评估NOD的现实生活管理和行为,重点关注运动特征和具体治疗的实施。设计:这是一项多中心前瞻性观察性研究,在葡萄牙队列中跟踪NOD的管理和演变6个月,重点关注吞咽困难和生活质量,以评估其临床行为。方法:在基线和随访时采用有效的患者报告问卷对195例患者的吞咽困难和生活质量进行评估。结果:195例患者中,61% (n = 119)为女性,平均年龄61岁(SD 15)。根据Chicago分类4.0,32.3% (n = 63)患者有EGJ流出障碍,12.8% (n = 25)患者有痉挛性障碍,16.4% (n = 32)患者有运动障碍,35.9% (n = 70)患者运动正常,2.6% (n = 5)患者尚无定论。在基线时,PROMIS胃肠吞咽障碍(PDS) t评分、EQ-5D-3L和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的平均评分分别为61.7 (SD 7.4)、0.61 (SD 0.26)和69 (SD 18)。总体而言,6个月时,Eckardt、PDS和EQ-5D-3L评分均有显著改善,VAS评分无差异。在EGJ疾病中,肌切开术显著改善了所有测量结果。在其余亚组中,观察到良好的吞咽困难进展,在治疗和未治疗的患者之间没有差异。结论:NOD倾向于良性发展。除了贲门失弛缓症,它有最明确的治疗方法和记录的好处,其余的运动特征的决定应该遵循一个全面和个性化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.

Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.

Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.

Real-life management of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia: analysis of a prospective multicentric Portuguese cohort.

Background: Nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia (NOD) is a common benign condition that significantly impacts quality of life. Management requires a motility-focused approach and consideration for concomitant comorbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux, visceral hypersensitivity, and psychological factors. Currently, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow disorders have the most studied and effective treatments. Data on patient-reported dysphagia and quality of life in this population, and their evolution over time and treatment, are scarce.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the real-world management and behavior of NOD, focusing on motility profiles and the implementation of specific treatments.

Design: This is a multicenter prospective observational study that follows the management and evolution of NOD in a Portuguese cohort for 6 months, focusing on dysphagia and quality of life, to evaluate its clinical behavior.

Methods: Dysphagia and quality of life were assessed in 195 patients using validated patient-reported questionnaires at baseline and follow-up.

Results: From 195 patients, 61% (n = 119) were female, with a mean age of 61 (SD 15) years. According to Chicago classification 4.0, 32.3% (n = 63) had EGJ outflow disorders, 12.8% (n = 25) spastic disorders, 16.4% (n = 32) hypomotile disorders, 35.9% (n = 70) normal motility, and 2.6% (n = 5) were inconclusive. At baseline, the mean PROMIS Gastrointestinal Disrupted Swallowing (PDS) T-score, EQ-5D-3L, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were 61.7 (SD 7.4), 0.61 (SD 0.26), and 69 (SD 18), respectively. Overall, at 6 months, there were significant improvements in the Eckardt, PDS, and EQ-5D-3L scores, with no difference in VAS. In EGJ disorders, myotomy significantly improved all measurements. In the remaining subgroups, a favorable evolution of dysphagia was observed, without differences between treated and untreated patients.

Conclusion: NOD tends to follow a benign course. Apart from achalasia, which has the most defined treatments with documented benefits, decisions for the remaining motility profiles should follow a comprehensive and personalized approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信