创伤后应激障碍中的强迫信念。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robert E Fite, Johanna Thompson-Hollands
{"title":"创伤后应激障碍中的强迫信念。","authors":"Robert E Fite, Johanna Thompson-Hollands","doi":"10.1007/s10942-025-00597-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maladaptive beliefs have been a focus of research in both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the OCD literature, beliefs that have typically been studied include inflated responsibility, overestimation of threat, perfectionism, intolerance of uncertainty, and importance and control of thoughts. Meanwhile, in the PTSD literature, negative beliefs about the self, the world, and others have been the focus. We propose that many beliefs commonly studied in the context of OCD research are also relevant to PTSD. Specifically, we propose that trauma may make individuals vulnerable to particular categories of beliefs, whereas other categories may represent pre-existing risk factors. Our theoretical paper highlights how these beliefs have been measured in prior OCD and PTSD research and identifies belief categories that may be clinically relevant but historically under-assessed among individuals with PTSD. Finally, we discuss potential clinical interventions for addressing obsessive beliefs in the context of PTSD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","volume":"43 3","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obsessive Beliefs in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Robert E Fite, Johanna Thompson-Hollands\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10942-025-00597-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Maladaptive beliefs have been a focus of research in both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the OCD literature, beliefs that have typically been studied include inflated responsibility, overestimation of threat, perfectionism, intolerance of uncertainty, and importance and control of thoughts. Meanwhile, in the PTSD literature, negative beliefs about the self, the world, and others have been the focus. We propose that many beliefs commonly studied in the context of OCD research are also relevant to PTSD. Specifically, we propose that trauma may make individuals vulnerable to particular categories of beliefs, whereas other categories may represent pre-existing risk factors. Our theoretical paper highlights how these beliefs have been measured in prior OCD and PTSD research and identifies belief categories that may be clinically relevant but historically under-assessed among individuals with PTSD. Finally, we discuss potential clinical interventions for addressing obsessive beliefs in the context of PTSD treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00597-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-025-00597-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适应不良信念一直是强迫症(OCD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)研究的热点。在强迫症文献中,典型的信念研究包括夸大的责任,对威胁的高估,完美主义,对不确定性的不容忍,以及思想的重要性和控制力。与此同时,在创伤后应激障碍的文献中,关于自我、世界和他人的消极信念一直是关注的焦点。我们提出,在强迫症研究背景下通常研究的许多信念也与创伤后应激障碍有关。具体来说,我们认为创伤可能使个体容易受到特定类别的信念的影响,而其他类别可能代表了先前存在的风险因素。我们的理论论文强调了这些信念是如何在之前的强迫症和创伤后应激障碍研究中被测量的,并确定了可能与临床相关但在创伤后应激障碍患者中历史上被低估的信念类别。最后,我们讨论了在PTSD治疗的背景下解决强迫信念的潜在临床干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obsessive Beliefs in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Maladaptive beliefs have been a focus of research in both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In the OCD literature, beliefs that have typically been studied include inflated responsibility, overestimation of threat, perfectionism, intolerance of uncertainty, and importance and control of thoughts. Meanwhile, in the PTSD literature, negative beliefs about the self, the world, and others have been the focus. We propose that many beliefs commonly studied in the context of OCD research are also relevant to PTSD. Specifically, we propose that trauma may make individuals vulnerable to particular categories of beliefs, whereas other categories may represent pre-existing risk factors. Our theoretical paper highlights how these beliefs have been measured in prior OCD and PTSD research and identifies belief categories that may be clinically relevant but historically under-assessed among individuals with PTSD. Finally, we discuss potential clinical interventions for addressing obsessive beliefs in the context of PTSD treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Behavior Therapy is an international journal that publishes scholarly original papers concerning Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), behavior therapy, cognitive-behavioral hypnosis, and hypnotherapy, clinical and counseling psychology, psychiatry, mental health counseling, and allied areas of science and practice. The journal encourages scholarly debate amongst professionals involved in practice, theory, research, and training in all areas of scholarship relevant to REBT and CBT. The Journal is particularly interested in articles that define clinical practice and research and theoretical articles that have direct clinical applications. The Journal seeks theoretical discussions and literature reviews on the cognitive bases of the development and alleviation of emotional, behavioral, interpersonal, personality, and addictive disorders. We consider submissions on the applications of REBT and CBT to new areas of practice and client populations. The Journal considers the term Cognitive Behavior Therapy to represent a generic, overriding category or school of psychotherapy approaches that includes many different theories and techniques. The journals encourages research that clearly identifies the specific hypothetical constructs and techniques being measured, tested, and discussed, and the comparison of the relative influence of different cognitive processes, constructs, and techniques  on emotional and behavioral disturbance. The Journal provides a timely introduction to unexplored avenues on the cutting edge of REBT and CBT research, theory, and practice.The Journal  publishes:discussions of the philosophical foundations of psychotherapiestheory-buildingtheoretical articlesoriginal outcome research articlesbrief research reportsoriginal research on the support of theoretical models development of scales to assess cognitive and affective constructsresearch reviewsclinical practice reviewsempirically-based case studiesdescriptions of innovative therapeutic techniques and proceduresadvances in clinical trainingliterature reviews book reviewsUnder the guidance of an expanded, international editorial board consisting of acknowledged leaders in the field, the journal disseminates current, valuable information to researchers and practitioners in psychology, psychotherapy, psychiatry, mental health counseling, social work, education, and related fields.Manuscripts usually are less than 35 pages, double-spaced, and using 11 or 12-point font. If the authors need more space to communicate their research or ideas, they should write to the editors to discuss this issue and provide a rationale why more than the commended number of pages is needed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信