Global longitudinal strain in the prediction of significant coronary artery disease: how accurate is it for patients with a high clinical probability of chronic coronary syndrome and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction?

Background: GLS is a non-invasive imaging test that can be useful in the selection of patients highly suspected of CCS for coronary angiogram.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of rest 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with high clinical probability of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: A prospective study enrolled 52 patients referred for coronary angiography due to highly suspected CCS. Participants were divided into CAD+ (significant stenosis) and CAD- (normal or non-significant stenosis). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), exercise EKG, 2D-STE, and coronary angiography were performed. Global longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS) was calculated using 2D-STE, with a cut-off value of -18% for normal GLS. Reproducibility was assessed with intraclass correlation.

Results: The mean age of participants was 62.5 ± 11.9 years, and 63.5% were male. The CAD + group (51.9%) had significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and typical angina. GLS was significantly lower in the CAD + group (-15.89 ± 2.07%) compared to the CAD- group (-18.99 ± 2.37%, p = 0.0001). The optimal GLS cut-off for detecting significant coronary lesions was - 16.9%, with 74% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.94). GLS correlated with the number of diseased vessels (p = 0.0001) but not with lesion complexity (SYNTAX score, p = 0.18). Regional strain was significantly reduced in patients with obstructive lesions in the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex arteries (CX), with optimal cut-offs at -19.2% and - 15.8%, respectively. GLS showed excellent inter-operator reproducibility (ICC = 0.94, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: GLS demonstrates good diagnostic performance in detecting obstructive CAD in patients with a high pre-test probability of CCS and preserved LVEF. It serves as a reliable, reproducible indicator of significant coronary lesions, with promising clinical utility for non-invasive CAD assessment, particularly in resource-limited settings.