波斯语精神错乱量表效度和信度的检验。

Q2 Medicine
Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Reza Naghdi Sadeh, Mehrdad Ghaemmaghami, Mohammad Hossein Parchehbaf Mohseni
{"title":"波斯语精神错乱量表效度和信度的检验。","authors":"Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Reza Naghdi Sadeh, Mehrdad Ghaemmaghami, Mohammad Hossein Parchehbaf Mohseni","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Compiling and designing short and practical psychometric tools are among the benefits and strengths of a good standard test. The Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire measures patients' delirium status. Accordingly, the main aim of this research was to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This exploratory psychometric study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 at the therapeutic research training centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The study population included patients diagnosed with delirium. Content and construct validity were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 18, which helped identify the underlying factor structure, while confirmatory factor analysis in Smart PLS was employed to confirm the structure's fit. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the consistency between different raters, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. These methods were selected for their robustness in evaluating the instrument's psychometric properties, ensuring the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire. <b>Results:</b> The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire, consisting of 11 items, demonstrated strong psychometric properties. The average impact factor was 3.24, indicating a high relevance of the items. The content validity ratio was 0.78, and the content validity index was 0.87, both above the acceptable thresholds, confirming the content validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.77, reflecting good internal consistency. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index was 0.88, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (χ² = 278.45, P < 0.001), indicating the appropriateness of the data for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 76.09% of the total variance, supporting the questionnaire's construct validity. Additionally, Pearson's correlation coefficient between the assessments of two nurses was 0.91, signifying inter-rater solid reliability. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity, as confirmed by the comprehensive psychometric evaluation conducted in this study. The strong internal consistency, significant content and construct validity, and high inter-rater reliability underscore its effectiveness in assessing delirium in Persian-speaking patients. These findings highlight the questionnaire's suitability for clinical use, providing a reliable and valid instrument for accurately diagnosing and managing delirium in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"19 4","pages":"412-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Checking the Validity and Reliability of the Delirium-O-Meter Questionnaire in the Persian Language.\",\"authors\":\"Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Reza Naghdi Sadeh, Mehrdad Ghaemmaghami, Mohammad Hossein Parchehbaf Mohseni\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Compiling and designing short and practical psychometric tools are among the benefits and strengths of a good standard test. The Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire measures patients' delirium status. Accordingly, the main aim of this research was to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. <b>Method</b> <b>:</b> This exploratory psychometric study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 at the therapeutic research training centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The study population included patients diagnosed with delirium. Content and construct validity were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 18, which helped identify the underlying factor structure, while confirmatory factor analysis in Smart PLS was employed to confirm the structure's fit. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the consistency between different raters, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. These methods were selected for their robustness in evaluating the instrument's psychometric properties, ensuring the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire. <b>Results:</b> The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire, consisting of 11 items, demonstrated strong psychometric properties. The average impact factor was 3.24, indicating a high relevance of the items. The content validity ratio was 0.78, and the content validity index was 0.87, both above the acceptable thresholds, confirming the content validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.77, reflecting good internal consistency. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index was 0.88, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (χ² = 278.45, P < 0.001), indicating the appropriateness of the data for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 76.09% of the total variance, supporting the questionnaire's construct validity. Additionally, Pearson's correlation coefficient between the assessments of two nurses was 0.91, signifying inter-rater solid reliability. <b>Conclusion:</b> The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity, as confirmed by the comprehensive psychometric evaluation conducted in this study. The strong internal consistency, significant content and construct validity, and high inter-rater reliability underscore its effectiveness in assessing delirium in Persian-speaking patients. These findings highlight the questionnaire's suitability for clinical use, providing a reliable and valid instrument for accurately diagnosing and managing delirium in diverse healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"412-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制和设计短小实用的心理测量工具是一个好的标准测试的好处和优势之一。delirium - o - meter问卷测量患者的谵妄状态。因此,本研究的主要目的是检查波斯语版问卷的信度和效度。方法:本探索性心理测量学研究于2021年至2022年在大不里士医科大学治疗研究培训中心进行。研究人群包括被诊断为谵妄的患者。采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析对内容和结构效度进行评估。探索性因子分析使用SPSS 18进行,这有助于确定潜在的因素结构,而验证性因子分析在智能PLS被用来确认结构的契合度。采用Pearson相关评价不同评分者之间的一致性,计算Cronbach’s alpha评价内部一致性。选择这些方法是因为它们在评估仪器的心理测量特性方面具有稳健性,确保了波斯语版谵妄- o - meter问卷的信度和效度。结果:波斯语版谵妄- o - meter问卷共有11个条目,具有较强的心理测量特性。平均影响因子为3.24,表明项目的相关性很高。内容效度比为0.78,内容效度指数为0.87,均高于可接受阈值,证实了问卷的内容效度。整个问卷的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.77,反映出较好的内部一致性。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin指数为0.88,Bartlett球形检验有统计学意义(χ 2 = 278.45, P < 0.001),表明数据适合进行因子分析。探索性因子分析显示,两个因子解释了76.09%的总方差,支持问卷的结构效度。此外,两名护士的评估之间的Pearson相关系数为0.91,表明量表间的可靠度。结论:波斯语版谵妄- o - meter问卷具有可接受的信度和效度,经本研究进行的综合心理测量评估证实。其内部一致性强,内容效度和结构效度显著,评分间信度高,表明其在评估波斯语患者谵妄方面的有效性。这些发现突出了问卷对临床使用的适用性,为在不同的医疗环境中准确诊断和管理谵妄提供了可靠和有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Checking the Validity and Reliability of the Delirium-O-Meter Questionnaire in the Persian Language.

Checking the Validity and Reliability of the Delirium-O-Meter Questionnaire in the Persian Language.

Checking the Validity and Reliability of the Delirium-O-Meter Questionnaire in the Persian Language.

Objective: Compiling and designing short and practical psychometric tools are among the benefits and strengths of a good standard test. The Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire measures patients' delirium status. Accordingly, the main aim of this research was to check the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this questionnaire. Method : This exploratory psychometric study was conducted from 2021 to 2022 at the therapeutic research training centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The study population included patients diagnosed with delirium. Content and construct validity were assessed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using SPSS 18, which helped identify the underlying factor structure, while confirmatory factor analysis in Smart PLS was employed to confirm the structure's fit. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate the consistency between different raters, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. These methods were selected for their robustness in evaluating the instrument's psychometric properties, ensuring the reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire. Results: The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire, consisting of 11 items, demonstrated strong psychometric properties. The average impact factor was 3.24, indicating a high relevance of the items. The content validity ratio was 0.78, and the content validity index was 0.87, both above the acceptable thresholds, confirming the content validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.77, reflecting good internal consistency. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index was 0.88, and Bartlett's sphericity test was significant (χ² = 278.45, P < 0.001), indicating the appropriateness of the data for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 76.09% of the total variance, supporting the questionnaire's construct validity. Additionally, Pearson's correlation coefficient between the assessments of two nurses was 0.91, signifying inter-rater solid reliability. Conclusion: The Persian version of the Delirium-O-Meter questionnaire demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity, as confirmed by the comprehensive psychometric evaluation conducted in this study. The strong internal consistency, significant content and construct validity, and high inter-rater reliability underscore its effectiveness in assessing delirium in Persian-speaking patients. These findings highlight the questionnaire's suitability for clinical use, providing a reliable and valid instrument for accurately diagnosing and managing delirium in diverse healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信