食管癌切除后辅助免疫治疗的初步实际预后:台湾回顾性研究。

IF 1 Q4 Medicine
Chia Liu, Yi-Chen Yeh, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Han-Shui Hsu, Po-Kuei Hsu
{"title":"食管癌切除后辅助免疫治疗的初步实际预后:台湾回顾性研究。","authors":"Chia Liu, Yi-Chen Yeh, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Han-Shui Hsu, Po-Kuei Hsu","doi":"10.5090/jcs.25.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival in patients with resected esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes associated with adjuvant immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with esophageal cancer and residual pathological disease who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection between January 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were grouped by adjuvant treatment received: no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy (AI), or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients meeting CheckMate 577 eligibility criteria and those with pathological node-positive (ypN+) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 127 patients (mean age: 60 years; male: 86%): 23 received AI, 36 AC, and 68 received no adjuvant therapy. There were no significant differences in OS between AI and AC groups (median OS [mOS]: 34 months vs. 34 months; p=0.81), nor in RFS (median RFS [mRFS]: 15 months vs. 16 months; p=0.94). In the CheckMate 577-eligible subgroup (n=68), OS and RFS were similar between AI and AC groups (mOS: 25 months vs. 47 months; p=0.16; mRFS: 19 months vs. 20 months; p=0.74). Likewise, among ypN+ patients (n=54), no significant differences in OS or RFS were noted between AI and AC (mOS: 34 months vs. 31 months; p=0.74; mRFS: 9.5 months vs. 14 months; p=0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to AC, even in patients meeting CheckMate 577 criteria or those with ypN+ status. Identifying the optimal adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer remains a challenging and evolving issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":"58 4","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Chia Liu, Yi-Chen Yeh, Ling-I Chien, Chien-Sheng Huang, Han-Shui Hsu, Po-Kuei Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.5090/jcs.25.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival in patients with resected esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes associated with adjuvant immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with esophageal cancer and residual pathological disease who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection between January 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were grouped by adjuvant treatment received: no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy (AI), or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients meeting CheckMate 577 eligibility criteria and those with pathological node-positive (ypN+) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 127 patients (mean age: 60 years; male: 86%): 23 received AI, 36 AC, and 68 received no adjuvant therapy. There were no significant differences in OS between AI and AC groups (median OS [mOS]: 34 months vs. 34 months; p=0.81), nor in RFS (median RFS [mRFS]: 15 months vs. 16 months; p=0.94). In the CheckMate 577-eligible subgroup (n=68), OS and RFS were similar between AI and AC groups (mOS: 25 months vs. 47 months; p=0.16; mRFS: 19 months vs. 20 months; p=0.74). Likewise, among ypN+ patients (n=54), no significant differences in OS or RFS were noted between AI and AC (mOS: 34 months vs. 31 months; p=0.74; mRFS: 9.5 months vs. 14 months; p=0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to AC, even in patients meeting CheckMate 577 criteria or those with ypN+ status. Identifying the optimal adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer remains a challenging and evolving issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chest Surgery\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"134-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230691/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chest Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.25.024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.25.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CheckMate 577试验表明,辅助nivolumab可提高食管癌切除患者在新辅助放化疗后的无病生存期。本研究旨在评估与辅助免疫治疗相关的实际结果。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2024年2月食管癌合并残留病理病变行新辅助治疗后手术切除的患者。参与者根据接受的辅助治疗进行分组:无辅助治疗、辅助免疫治疗(AI)或辅助化疗(AC)。主要结局包括总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)。对符合CheckMate 577资格标准的患者和病理淋巴结阳性(ypN+)状态的患者进行亚组分析。结果:纳入127例患者(平均年龄60岁;男性:86%):接受人工智能治疗23例,AC治疗36例,未接受辅助治疗68例。AI组和AC组的生存期无显著差异(中位生存期[mOS]: 34个月vs. 34个月;p=0.81),而RFS(中位RFS [mRFS]: 15个月vs. 16个月;p = 0.94)。在CheckMate 577合格亚组(n=68)中,AI组和AC组之间的OS和RFS相似(最长时间:25个月vs 47个月;p = 0.16;mRFS: 19个月vs 20个月;p = 0.74)。同样,在ypN+患者(n=54)中,AI和AC之间的OS或RFS无显著差异(最长时间:34个月vs. 31个月;p = 0.74;mRFS: 9.5个月vs. 14个月;p = 0.89)。结论:与AC相比,AI没有表现出显著的生存优势,即使在符合CheckMate 577标准或ypN+状态的患者中也是如此。确定食管癌的最佳辅助治疗仍然是一个具有挑战性和不断发展的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study from Taiwan.

Background: The CheckMate 577 trial demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival in patients with resected esophageal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes associated with adjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer and residual pathological disease who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection between January 2019 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Participants were grouped by adjuvant treatment received: no adjuvant therapy, adjuvant immunotherapy (AI), or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients meeting CheckMate 577 eligibility criteria and those with pathological node-positive (ypN+) status.

Results: The study included 127 patients (mean age: 60 years; male: 86%): 23 received AI, 36 AC, and 68 received no adjuvant therapy. There were no significant differences in OS between AI and AC groups (median OS [mOS]: 34 months vs. 34 months; p=0.81), nor in RFS (median RFS [mRFS]: 15 months vs. 16 months; p=0.94). In the CheckMate 577-eligible subgroup (n=68), OS and RFS were similar between AI and AC groups (mOS: 25 months vs. 47 months; p=0.16; mRFS: 19 months vs. 20 months; p=0.74). Likewise, among ypN+ patients (n=54), no significant differences in OS or RFS were noted between AI and AC (mOS: 34 months vs. 31 months; p=0.74; mRFS: 9.5 months vs. 14 months; p=0.89).

Conclusion: AI did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage compared to AC, even in patients meeting CheckMate 577 criteria or those with ypN+ status. Identifying the optimal adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer remains a challenging and evolving issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信