Lily S Switzer, Emma B Nadler, Jennifer A Dermott, Karim Aboelmagd, Alison Anthony, Dorothy J Kim, Mark Camp, David E Lebel
{"title":"与同等的非分期手术相比,分期生长棒插入术后并发症增加。","authors":"Lily S Switzer, Emma B Nadler, Jennifer A Dermott, Karim Aboelmagd, Alison Anthony, Dorothy J Kim, Mark Camp, David E Lebel","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0047.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Anchor-related complications are the leading cause for unplanned surgery in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). One strategy to reduce unplanned surgery is staging implant insertion. This study compares the outcomes of staged versus unstaged growing rod (GR) insertion, focusing on complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined 48 EOS patients who received GR surgery at a single institution (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada) between January 2006 and July 2023. Patients were grouped according to staged and unstaged GR insertion. Radiological measurements were obtained preoperatively, post-insertion, and one-year follow-up to determine radiological change between and within each group. Complications were recorded until posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent follow-up if no PSF was performed, and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 24 patients received staged and 24 patients received unstaged dual GR insertion. The mean follow-up time for patients was 53.1 months (SD 33.1). Patients who underwent unstaged insertion had greater Cobb angle correction (46.6% (SD 15.9%) vs 31.5% (SD 13.3%), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in kyphosis correction (p = 0.118) or thoracic height growth (p = 0.348) between groups. Staged patients experienced a higher complication rate compared to unstaged patients within the first year following insertion (38% vs 12%). Differences in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development between staged (17%) and unstaged (29%) patients were not significant (p = 0.303). The mean insertion-associated length of stay was longer in staged patients (10.7 days (SD 4.2)) compared to unstaged patients (5.8 days (SD 4.0), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staged and unstaged GR insertion results in acceptable coronal correction and comparable radiological parameters. However, staged insertion may not be superior to unstaged insertion given the increased length of stay and rate of complications associated with the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 7","pages":"733-740"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Staging growing rod insertion results in increased postoperative complications than the equivalent unstaged procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Lily S Switzer, Emma B Nadler, Jennifer A Dermott, Karim Aboelmagd, Alison Anthony, Dorothy J Kim, Mark Camp, David E Lebel\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0047.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Anchor-related complications are the leading cause for unplanned surgery in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). One strategy to reduce unplanned surgery is staging implant insertion. This study compares the outcomes of staged versus unstaged growing rod (GR) insertion, focusing on complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined 48 EOS patients who received GR surgery at a single institution (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada) between January 2006 and July 2023. Patients were grouped according to staged and unstaged GR insertion. Radiological measurements were obtained preoperatively, post-insertion, and one-year follow-up to determine radiological change between and within each group. Complications were recorded until posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent follow-up if no PSF was performed, and compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 24 patients received staged and 24 patients received unstaged dual GR insertion. The mean follow-up time for patients was 53.1 months (SD 33.1). Patients who underwent unstaged insertion had greater Cobb angle correction (46.6% (SD 15.9%) vs 31.5% (SD 13.3%), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in kyphosis correction (p = 0.118) or thoracic height growth (p = 0.348) between groups. Staged patients experienced a higher complication rate compared to unstaged patients within the first year following insertion (38% vs 12%). Differences in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development between staged (17%) and unstaged (29%) patients were not significant (p = 0.303). The mean insertion-associated length of stay was longer in staged patients (10.7 days (SD 4.2)) compared to unstaged patients (5.8 days (SD 4.0), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staged and unstaged GR insertion results in acceptable coronal correction and comparable radiological parameters. However, staged insertion may not be superior to unstaged insertion given the increased length of stay and rate of complications associated with the procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 7\",\"pages\":\"733-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0047.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.67.BJO-2025-0047.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:锚定相关并发症是早发性脊柱侧凸(EOS)非计划手术的主要原因。减少计划外手术的一个策略是分期植入。本研究比较了分期与非分期生长棒(GR)插入的结果,重点是并发症发生率。方法:本回顾性队列研究调查了2006年1月至2023年7月间在一家机构(加拿大多伦多病童医院)接受GR手术的48例EOS患者。根据分期和非分期的GR插入对患者进行分组。术前、术后和1年随访均获得放射学测量,以确定各组之间和组内的放射学变化。记录并发症直至后路脊柱融合术(PSF)或未行后路脊柱融合术(PSF)的最近随访,并比较两组之间的差异。结果:总体而言,24例患者接受了分期和24例患者接受了未分期的双GR插入。患者平均随访时间为53.1个月(SD 33.1)。接受非分期插入的患者有更大的Cobb角矫正(46.6% (SD 15.9%) vs 31.5% (SD 13.3%), p < 0.001)。两组间后凸矫正(p = 0.118)和胸高增长(p = 0.348)差异无统计学意义。在植入后的第一年内,分期患者的并发症发生率高于未分期患者(38% vs 12%)。分阶段(17%)和未分阶段(29%)患者的近端交界性后凸(PJK)发展差异无统计学意义(p = 0.303)。分期患者的平均插入相关住院时间(10.7天(SD 4.2))比未分期患者(5.8天(SD 4.0), p < 0.001)更长。结论:分期和非分期GR插入均可获得可接受的冠状面矫正和相当的放射学参数。然而,考虑到与手术相关的住院时间和并发症发生率的增加,分期插入可能并不优于不分期插入。
Staging growing rod insertion results in increased postoperative complications than the equivalent unstaged procedure.
Aims: Anchor-related complications are the leading cause for unplanned surgery in early-onset scoliosis (EOS). One strategy to reduce unplanned surgery is staging implant insertion. This study compares the outcomes of staged versus unstaged growing rod (GR) insertion, focusing on complication rates.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined 48 EOS patients who received GR surgery at a single institution (Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada) between January 2006 and July 2023. Patients were grouped according to staged and unstaged GR insertion. Radiological measurements were obtained preoperatively, post-insertion, and one-year follow-up to determine radiological change between and within each group. Complications were recorded until posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent follow-up if no PSF was performed, and compared between groups.
Results: Overall, 24 patients received staged and 24 patients received unstaged dual GR insertion. The mean follow-up time for patients was 53.1 months (SD 33.1). Patients who underwent unstaged insertion had greater Cobb angle correction (46.6% (SD 15.9%) vs 31.5% (SD 13.3%), p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in kyphosis correction (p = 0.118) or thoracic height growth (p = 0.348) between groups. Staged patients experienced a higher complication rate compared to unstaged patients within the first year following insertion (38% vs 12%). Differences in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development between staged (17%) and unstaged (29%) patients were not significant (p = 0.303). The mean insertion-associated length of stay was longer in staged patients (10.7 days (SD 4.2)) compared to unstaged patients (5.8 days (SD 4.0), p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Staged and unstaged GR insertion results in acceptable coronal correction and comparable radiological parameters. However, staged insertion may not be superior to unstaged insertion given the increased length of stay and rate of complications associated with the procedure.