中心经验与肝门部胆管癌肝移植生存率提高相关:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001822
Omar Bushara, Yash Kadakia, Katharine Krupp, Jessica Friedman, Maarouf A Hoteit, Therese Bittermann, Tarek Araji, Matthew H Levine
{"title":"中心经验与肝门部胆管癌肝移植生存率提高相关:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Omar Bushara, Yash Kadakia, Katharine Krupp, Jessica Friedman, Maarouf A Hoteit, Therese Bittermann, Tarek Araji, Matthew H Levine","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has limited treatments, with transplantation emerging as a curative option. During the era of regional patient review, it was suggested that transplant centers performing a higher volume of transplants for cholangiocarcinoma had improved outcomes. However, it is unknown whether this association persists since the national standardization of guidelines in May 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transplant candidates listed in the United Network of Organ Sharing database using cholangiocarcinoma exception points from May 2019 to December 2022 were included. Experienced centers were defined as performing at least 10 transplants during the time period. Recipient and donor characteristics, graft and patient survival, and hospital length of stay were compared between more and less experienced centers. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox hazards analyses were used where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May 2019 and December 2022, 166 transplants for cholangiocarcinoma were performed at 37 centers, with \"more experienced\" centers accounting for 59% (n = 98). Unadjusted graft survival (<i>P</i> = 0.03) and patient survival (<i>P</i> = 0.047) were lower at less experienced centers. In addition to center experience, univariable Cox analyses recipient age (0.02), diabetes (0.18), and donor age (0.08) had a <i>P</i> value of ≤0.2. In a covariate-adjusted model, more experienced centers were associated with a 70% lower hazard of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.70; <i>P</i> = 0.006) and 72% lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.27; confidence interval, 0.11-0.69; <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that experienced centers have improved posttransplant survival. Variations in selection and postoperative care not captured by this study may underlie this association. More granular studies are warranted to elucidate the impact of center experience on outcomes in transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 7","pages":"e1822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Center Experience Is Associated With Improved Survival in Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Bushara, Yash Kadakia, Katharine Krupp, Jessica Friedman, Maarouf A Hoteit, Therese Bittermann, Tarek Araji, Matthew H Levine\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has limited treatments, with transplantation emerging as a curative option. During the era of regional patient review, it was suggested that transplant centers performing a higher volume of transplants for cholangiocarcinoma had improved outcomes. However, it is unknown whether this association persists since the national standardization of guidelines in May 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transplant candidates listed in the United Network of Organ Sharing database using cholangiocarcinoma exception points from May 2019 to December 2022 were included. Experienced centers were defined as performing at least 10 transplants during the time period. Recipient and donor characteristics, graft and patient survival, and hospital length of stay were compared between more and less experienced centers. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox hazards analyses were used where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between May 2019 and December 2022, 166 transplants for cholangiocarcinoma were performed at 37 centers, with \\\"more experienced\\\" centers accounting for 59% (n = 98). Unadjusted graft survival (<i>P</i> = 0.03) and patient survival (<i>P</i> = 0.047) were lower at less experienced centers. In addition to center experience, univariable Cox analyses recipient age (0.02), diabetes (0.18), and donor age (0.08) had a <i>P</i> value of ≤0.2. In a covariate-adjusted model, more experienced centers were associated with a 70% lower hazard of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.70; <i>P</i> = 0.006) and 72% lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.27; confidence interval, 0.11-0.69; <i>P</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that experienced centers have improved posttransplant survival. Variations in selection and postoperative care not captured by this study may underlie this association. More granular studies are warranted to elucidate the impact of center experience on outcomes in transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":\"11 7\",\"pages\":\"e1822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肝门胆管癌的治疗方法有限,移植是一种治疗选择。在区域患者回顾的时代,有人建议移植中心对胆管癌进行更大的移植可以改善预后。然而,自2019年5月国家指南标准化以来,这种关联是否存在尚不清楚。方法:纳入2019年5月至2022年12月联合器官共享网络数据库中使用胆管癌例外点列出的移植候选人。经验丰富的中心被定义为在此期间至少进行了10次移植手术。在经验丰富和经验不足的中心之间比较了受体和供体特征、移植物和患者存活率以及住院时间。适当时采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、Fisher精确检验、Kaplan-Meier曲线、对数秩检验和Cox风险分析。结果:2019年5月至2022年12月,37家中心共进行了166例胆管癌移植手术,其中“经验更丰富”的中心占59% (n = 98)。在经验不足的中心,未调整的移植物存活率(P = 0.03)和患者存活率(P = 0.047)较低。除中心经验外,单变量Cox分析受者年龄(0.02)、糖尿病(0.18)和供者年龄(0.08)的P值均≤0.2。在协变量调整模型中,经验丰富的中心与移植失败风险降低70%相关(风险比,0.29;95%置信区间为0.12-0.70;P = 0.006),死亡风险降低72%(风险比0.27;置信区间0.11-0.69;p = 0.007)。结论:这些数据表明经验丰富的中心提高了移植后的存活率。本研究未捕获的选择和术后护理的变化可能是这种关联的基础。需要更细致的研究来阐明中心经验对胆管癌移植结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Center Experience Is Associated With Improved Survival in Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma has limited treatments, with transplantation emerging as a curative option. During the era of regional patient review, it was suggested that transplant centers performing a higher volume of transplants for cholangiocarcinoma had improved outcomes. However, it is unknown whether this association persists since the national standardization of guidelines in May 2019.

Methods: Transplant candidates listed in the United Network of Organ Sharing database using cholangiocarcinoma exception points from May 2019 to December 2022 were included. Experienced centers were defined as performing at least 10 transplants during the time period. Recipient and donor characteristics, graft and patient survival, and hospital length of stay were compared between more and less experienced centers. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox hazards analyses were used where appropriate.

Results: Between May 2019 and December 2022, 166 transplants for cholangiocarcinoma were performed at 37 centers, with "more experienced" centers accounting for 59% (n = 98). Unadjusted graft survival (P = 0.03) and patient survival (P = 0.047) were lower at less experienced centers. In addition to center experience, univariable Cox analyses recipient age (0.02), diabetes (0.18), and donor age (0.08) had a P value of ≤0.2. In a covariate-adjusted model, more experienced centers were associated with a 70% lower hazard of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.70; P = 0.006) and 72% lower hazard of mortality (hazard ratio, 0.27; confidence interval, 0.11-0.69; P = 0.007).

Conclusions: These data suggest that experienced centers have improved posttransplant survival. Variations in selection and postoperative care not captured by this study may underlie this association. More granular studies are warranted to elucidate the impact of center experience on outcomes in transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信