新一代测序在急性髓系白血病可测量残余疾病评估中的临床应用和预后价值。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20406207251349261
Yu Liu, Huanchen Cheng, Meng Sun, Tiejun Gong, Jun Ma
{"title":"新一代测序在急性髓系白血病可测量残余疾病评估中的临床应用和预后价值。","authors":"Yu Liu, Huanchen Cheng, Meng Sun, Tiejun Gong, Jun Ma","doi":"10.1177/20406207251349261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a method for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by detecting leukemia-associated genetic mutations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications and prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sixty-nine adult AML patients were included for NGS (targeted sequencing of AML-related 47 genes), of which 56 patients at initial diagnosis, 69 patients in the first day of consolidation therapy (C1D1), and 51 patients during 2-year MRD monitoring (detection following the C1D1) were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mutation data were categorized into gene mutations, somatic mutations and somatic mutations excluding clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) for analysis. The study also integrated multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS data at C1D1 to evaluate the prognostic significance of combining the two MRD techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mutation detection rates were 98.21%, 69.57%, and 84.31% for AML patients at initial diagnosis, C1D1 stage, and MRD monitoring, respectively, identified by targeted sequencing. During MRD monitoring, the <i>ETV6</i> mutation frequency was significantly higher in relapsed patients than in non-relapsed patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean variant allele frequency (VAF) was significantly higher in the 2-year MRD monitoring period (0.160 ± 0.155) compared to the C1D1 period (0.058 ± 0.087; <i>p</i> < 0.05) in relapsed patients. Survival analysis revealed that patients with a mean VAF (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) ⩽0.004 in the C1D1 stage and ⩽0.020 during MRD monitoring had a better prognosis. Furthermore, the combination of MFC and NGS-based MRD (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) at C1D1 stage showed that patients who were negative for two tests had longer survival than those who were negative for only one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined assessment of MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD status provides a refined prognostic stratification, with the absence of somatic mutations and MFC-MRD negativity correlating with improved progression-free survival, which is expected to improve clinical prognostic assessment of AML patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"16 ","pages":"20406207251349261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical utility and prognostic value of next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Liu, Huanchen Cheng, Meng Sun, Tiejun Gong, Jun Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20406207251349261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a method for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by detecting leukemia-associated genetic mutations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications and prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Sixty-nine adult AML patients were included for NGS (targeted sequencing of AML-related 47 genes), of which 56 patients at initial diagnosis, 69 patients in the first day of consolidation therapy (C1D1), and 51 patients during 2-year MRD monitoring (detection following the C1D1) were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mutation data were categorized into gene mutations, somatic mutations and somatic mutations excluding clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) for analysis. The study also integrated multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS data at C1D1 to evaluate the prognostic significance of combining the two MRD techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mutation detection rates were 98.21%, 69.57%, and 84.31% for AML patients at initial diagnosis, C1D1 stage, and MRD monitoring, respectively, identified by targeted sequencing. During MRD monitoring, the <i>ETV6</i> mutation frequency was significantly higher in relapsed patients than in non-relapsed patients (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The mean variant allele frequency (VAF) was significantly higher in the 2-year MRD monitoring period (0.160 ± 0.155) compared to the C1D1 period (0.058 ± 0.087; <i>p</i> < 0.05) in relapsed patients. Survival analysis revealed that patients with a mean VAF (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) ⩽0.004 in the C1D1 stage and ⩽0.020 during MRD monitoring had a better prognosis. Furthermore, the combination of MFC and NGS-based MRD (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) at C1D1 stage showed that patients who were negative for two tests had longer survival than those who were negative for only one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined assessment of MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD status provides a refined prognostic stratification, with the absence of somatic mutations and MFC-MRD negativity correlating with improved progression-free survival, which is expected to improve clinical prognostic assessment of AML patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20406207251349261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202931/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207251349261\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207251349261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下一代测序(NGS)提供了一种通过检测白血病相关基因突变来评估可测量的残留疾病(MRD)的方法。目的:本研究旨在评价基于ngs的MRD评估在急性髓系白血病(AML)中的临床意义和预后价值。设计:69例成人AML患者纳入NGS (AML相关47个基因的靶向测序),其中56例为初诊患者,69例为巩固治疗第一天(C1D1)患者,51例为2年MRD监测(C1D1后检测)患者。方法:将突变数据分为基因突变、体细胞突变和排除不确定潜力克隆造血(CHIP)的体细胞突变进行分析。该研究还整合了C1D1的多参数流式细胞术(MFC)和NGS数据,以评估两种MRD技术联合使用的预后意义。结果:AML患者在初诊、C1D1期和MRD监测时的突变检出率分别为98.21%、69.57%和84.31%。在MRD监测期间,复发患者的ETV6突变频率显著高于非复发患者(p < 0.05)。平均变异等位基因频率(VAF)在2年MRD监测期(0.160±0.155)显著高于C1D1期(0.058±0.087;P < 0.05)。生存分析显示,C1D1期平均VAF(不含CHIP的体细胞突变)≥0.004,MRD监测时平均VAF≥0.020的患者预后较好。此外,MFC和NGS-based MRD(排除CHIP的体细胞突变)在C1D1期的结合表明,两项检测阴性的患者比仅一项检测阴性的患者生存期更长。结论:联合评估MFC-MRD和NGS-MRD状态提供了一个精细的预后分层,没有体细胞突变和MFC-MRD阴性与改善的无进展生存相关,有望改善AML患者的临床预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The clinical utility and prognostic value of next-generation sequencing for measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers a method for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment by detecting leukemia-associated genetic mutations.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implications and prognostic value of NGS-based MRD assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Design: Sixty-nine adult AML patients were included for NGS (targeted sequencing of AML-related 47 genes), of which 56 patients at initial diagnosis, 69 patients in the first day of consolidation therapy (C1D1), and 51 patients during 2-year MRD monitoring (detection following the C1D1) were enrolled.

Methods: Mutation data were categorized into gene mutations, somatic mutations and somatic mutations excluding clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) for analysis. The study also integrated multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and NGS data at C1D1 to evaluate the prognostic significance of combining the two MRD techniques.

Results: Mutation detection rates were 98.21%, 69.57%, and 84.31% for AML patients at initial diagnosis, C1D1 stage, and MRD monitoring, respectively, identified by targeted sequencing. During MRD monitoring, the ETV6 mutation frequency was significantly higher in relapsed patients than in non-relapsed patients (p < 0.05). The mean variant allele frequency (VAF) was significantly higher in the 2-year MRD monitoring period (0.160 ± 0.155) compared to the C1D1 period (0.058 ± 0.087; p < 0.05) in relapsed patients. Survival analysis revealed that patients with a mean VAF (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) ⩽0.004 in the C1D1 stage and ⩽0.020 during MRD monitoring had a better prognosis. Furthermore, the combination of MFC and NGS-based MRD (somatic mutations excluding CHIP) at C1D1 stage showed that patients who were negative for two tests had longer survival than those who were negative for only one.

Conclusion: The combined assessment of MFC-MRD and NGS-MRD status provides a refined prognostic stratification, with the absence of somatic mutations and MFC-MRD negativity correlating with improved progression-free survival, which is expected to improve clinical prognostic assessment of AML patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信