提供最新的磁共振成像条件为当前的周围神经刺激和脊髓刺激系统在疼痛管理。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf076
Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung
{"title":"提供最新的磁共振成像条件为当前的周围神经刺激和脊髓刺激系统在疼痛管理。","authors":"Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of up-to-date magnetic resonance imaging conditionality for current peripheral nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation systems in pain management.\",\"authors\":\"Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnaf076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:植入神经调节装置的磁共振成像(MRI)安全性在现代医学中是一个关键的挑战。虽然脊髓刺激(SCS)和周围神经刺激(PNS)设备越来越多地用于疼痛管理,但制造商特定的MRI安全信息的分散性质给医疗保健提供者在做出明智的临床决策时带来了巨大的挑战。此外,尽管这些信息是公开的,但对文献的全面回顾表明,没有关于SCS和PNS的集中数据存储库。目的:将来自多家SCS和PNS设备制造商的综合MRI安全性数据整合为临床医生的集中资源,从而简化植入神经调节设备患者MRI扫描的决策过程。方法:我们收集了10家主要神经刺激公司(雅培、Biotronik、波士顿科学、Curonix、中流、美敦力、Nalu、nevo、Saluda和SPR Therapeutics)至2024年12月设备的MRI安全性数据。数据收集包括与制造商直接沟通和分析技术文件,以提取特定的mri相关参数。结果:在大多数SCS系统中,1.5 T的全身MRI安全性是标准的,有些设备允许3.0 T成像。具体限制因制造商而异,包括空间梯度磁场(1,000-4,000高斯/厘米),特定吸收率和主动扫描时间(15-60分钟)的限制。PNS系统显示出类似的安全模式。结论:本文解决了集中安全信息的迫切需求。随着设备技术的不断发展,该资源将需要不断更新,以保持其在支持知情临床决策和患者护理方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provision of up-to-date magnetic resonance imaging conditionality for current peripheral nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation systems in pain management.

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.

Objective: To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.

Methods: We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.

Results: Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.

Conclusions: This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信