Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung
{"title":"提供最新的磁共振成像条件为当前的周围神经刺激和脊髓刺激系统在疼痛管理。","authors":"Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of up-to-date magnetic resonance imaging conditionality for current peripheral nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation systems in pain management.\",\"authors\":\"Peter D Vu, Matthew Slitzky, Kobe Miller, Robert J Yong, Christopher L Robinson, Matthew Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnaf076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Provision of up-to-date magnetic resonance imaging conditionality for current peripheral nerve stimulation and spinal cord stimulation systems in pain management.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety with implanted neuromodulation devices presents a critical challenge in modern medicine. While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) devices are increasingly utilized for pain management, the scattered nature of manufacturer-specific MRI safety information creates substantial challenges for healthcare providers in making informed clinical decisions. Furthermore, despite the public availability of this information, a comprehensive review of the literature reveals no centralized repository of data regarding SCS and PNS.
Objective: To synthesize comprehensive MRI safety data from multiple manufacturers of SCS and PNS devices into a centralized resource for clinicians, thereby streamlining the decision-making process for MRI scanning in patients with implanted neuromodulation devices.
Methods: We collected MRI safety data for devices from ten major neurostimulation companies (Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Curonix, Mainstay, Medtronic, Nalu, Nevro, Saluda, and SPR Therapeutics) through December 2024. Data collection involved direct communication with manufacturers and analysis of technical documentation to extract specific MRI-related parameters.
Results: Full-body MRI safety at 1.5 T is standard across most SCS systems, with select devices permitting 3.0 T imaging. Specific limitations vary by manufacturer, including restrictions on spatial gradient magnetic fields (1,000-4,000 Gauss/cm), specific absorption rates, and active scan times (15-60 minutes). PNS systems show similar safety patterns.
Conclusions: This manuscript addresses the urgent need for centralized safety information. As device technology continues to evolve, this resource will require ongoing updates to maintain its utility in supporting informed clinical decision-making and patient care.
期刊介绍:
Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.