阿片类药物剂量、持续时间和使用障碍的风险在患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的医疗补助患者中。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf077
Allison Perry, Noa Krawczyk, Hillary Samples, Silvia S Martins, Katherine Hoffman, Nicholas T Williams, Anton Hung, Rachael Ross, Lisa Doan, Kara E Rudolph, Magdalena Cerdá
{"title":"阿片类药物剂量、持续时间和使用障碍的风险在患有肌肉骨骼疼痛的医疗补助患者中。","authors":"Allison Perry, Noa Krawczyk, Hillary Samples, Silvia S Martins, Katherine Hoffman, Nicholas T Williams, Anton Hung, Rachael Ross, Lisa Doan, Kara E Rudolph, Magdalena Cerdá","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The CDC recommends initiating opioids for pain treatment at the lowest effective dose and duration. We examine how interactions between dose, duration, and other medication factors (e.g., drug type) influence opioid use disorder (OUD) risk-a gap not considered by CDC guidelines.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Using Medicaid claims data (2016-2019) from 25 states, we analyzed opioid-naïve adults, newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain who initiated opioids within three months of diagnosis. A 6-month washout confirmed no prior opioid exposure or musculoskeletal diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial opioids were categorized by \"dose-days supplied\" (low [>0-20 mg MME] to very high [>90 mg MME] dose, and short [1-7 days] to moderate [>7-30 days] supply), and by opioid type; physical therapy (PT) sessions were also recorded. Using Poisson regression models, we estimated the OUD risk associated with dose-days categories, adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and medications. We separately examined opioid dose-days and PT, and assessed PT's moderating effect on dose-days' impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30,536 patients, half initiated opioids at 20-50 MME for 1-7 days, and 20% received PT. OUD risk was 2-3 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days compared to 1-7 days across doses, and 5.5 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days at > 90 MME versus 1-7 days at < 20 MME. PT alone, neither affected OUD risk nor mitigated the increased risk from longer or higher-dose opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the need for careful opioid prescribing and alternative pain management strategies, as the observed associations between initial prescription characteristics and OUD were not mitigated by adjunctive PT.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>This study demonstrated that initial opioid prescriptions of 7-30 days, especially above 90 MME/day, increased OUD risk in opioid-naïve patients with musculoskeletal pain; physical therapy did not mitigate the risk. Different opioids posed varied risks, even at the same dose and duration. Careful prescribing and alternative pain management are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid Dose, Duration, and Risk of Use Disorder in Medicaid Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Allison Perry, Noa Krawczyk, Hillary Samples, Silvia S Martins, Katherine Hoffman, Nicholas T Williams, Anton Hung, Rachael Ross, Lisa Doan, Kara E Rudolph, Magdalena Cerdá\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pm/pnaf077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The CDC recommends initiating opioids for pain treatment at the lowest effective dose and duration. We examine how interactions between dose, duration, and other medication factors (e.g., drug type) influence opioid use disorder (OUD) risk-a gap not considered by CDC guidelines.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Using Medicaid claims data (2016-2019) from 25 states, we analyzed opioid-naïve adults, newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain who initiated opioids within three months of diagnosis. A 6-month washout confirmed no prior opioid exposure or musculoskeletal diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial opioids were categorized by \\\"dose-days supplied\\\" (low [>0-20 mg MME] to very high [>90 mg MME] dose, and short [1-7 days] to moderate [>7-30 days] supply), and by opioid type; physical therapy (PT) sessions were also recorded. Using Poisson regression models, we estimated the OUD risk associated with dose-days categories, adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and medications. We separately examined opioid dose-days and PT, and assessed PT's moderating effect on dose-days' impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30,536 patients, half initiated opioids at 20-50 MME for 1-7 days, and 20% received PT. OUD risk was 2-3 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days compared to 1-7 days across doses, and 5.5 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days at > 90 MME versus 1-7 days at < 20 MME. PT alone, neither affected OUD risk nor mitigated the increased risk from longer or higher-dose opioids.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the need for careful opioid prescribing and alternative pain management strategies, as the observed associations between initial prescription characteristics and OUD were not mitigated by adjunctive PT.</p><p><strong>Perspective: </strong>This study demonstrated that initial opioid prescriptions of 7-30 days, especially above 90 MME/day, increased OUD risk in opioid-naïve patients with musculoskeletal pain; physical therapy did not mitigate the risk. Different opioids posed varied risks, even at the same dose and duration. Careful prescribing and alternative pain management are essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国疾病控制与预防中心建议在最低有效剂量和最低持续时间开始阿片类药物治疗疼痛。我们研究了剂量、持续时间和其他药物因素(如药物类型)之间的相互作用如何影响阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)风险——CDC指南未考虑这一差距。研究对象:使用来自25个州的医疗补助索赔数据(2016-2019),我们分析了opioid-naïve新诊断为肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人,他们在诊断后三个月内开始使用阿片类药物。6个月的洗脱期证实先前没有阿片类药物暴露或肌肉骨骼诊断。方法:初始阿片类药物按“剂量-天供应”(低[> - 20mg MME]至极高[>90mg MME]剂量,短[1-7天]至中等[>7-30天]供应)和阿片类药物类型进行分类;物理治疗(PT)疗程也被记录。使用泊松回归模型,我们估计了与剂量日类别相关的OUD风险,调整了基线人口统计学、临床特征和药物。我们分别检查了阿片类药物剂量日和PT,并评估了PT对剂量日影响的调节作用。结果:在30,536例患者中,一半的患者在20-50 MME时开始使用阿片类药物,持续1-7天,20%的患者接受了PT治疗。不同剂量的阿片类药物在bb0 -30天内使用的OUD风险是1-7天的2-3倍,在bb2 - 90 MME时使用的阿片类药物在bb1 -30天内使用的OUD风险是1-7天的5.5倍。我们的研究结果支持了谨慎的阿片类药物处方和替代疼痛管理策略的必要性,因为观察到的初始处方特征与OUD之间的关联并没有通过辅助治疗来减轻。观点:本研究表明,初始阿片类药物处方7-30天,特别是超过90 MME/天,增加了opioid-naïve肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的OUD风险;物理治疗并没有降低风险。即使在相同的剂量和持续时间下,不同的阿片类药物也会带来不同的风险。谨慎的处方和替代的疼痛管理是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opioid Dose, Duration, and Risk of Use Disorder in Medicaid Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain.

Objective: The CDC recommends initiating opioids for pain treatment at the lowest effective dose and duration. We examine how interactions between dose, duration, and other medication factors (e.g., drug type) influence opioid use disorder (OUD) risk-a gap not considered by CDC guidelines.

Subjects: Using Medicaid claims data (2016-2019) from 25 states, we analyzed opioid-naïve adults, newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain who initiated opioids within three months of diagnosis. A 6-month washout confirmed no prior opioid exposure or musculoskeletal diagnosis.

Methods: Initial opioids were categorized by "dose-days supplied" (low [>0-20 mg MME] to very high [>90 mg MME] dose, and short [1-7 days] to moderate [>7-30 days] supply), and by opioid type; physical therapy (PT) sessions were also recorded. Using Poisson regression models, we estimated the OUD risk associated with dose-days categories, adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and medications. We separately examined opioid dose-days and PT, and assessed PT's moderating effect on dose-days' impact.

Results: Among 30,536 patients, half initiated opioids at 20-50 MME for 1-7 days, and 20% received PT. OUD risk was 2-3 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days compared to 1-7 days across doses, and 5.5 times higher for opioids initiated for >7-30 days at > 90 MME versus 1-7 days at < 20 MME. PT alone, neither affected OUD risk nor mitigated the increased risk from longer or higher-dose opioids.

Conclusions: Our findings support the need for careful opioid prescribing and alternative pain management strategies, as the observed associations between initial prescription characteristics and OUD were not mitigated by adjunctive PT.

Perspective: This study demonstrated that initial opioid prescriptions of 7-30 days, especially above 90 MME/day, increased OUD risk in opioid-naïve patients with musculoskeletal pain; physical therapy did not mitigate the risk. Different opioids posed varied risks, even at the same dose and duration. Careful prescribing and alternative pain management are essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信