SPECT/计算机断层成像伪影的研究及其对SPECT量化的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000002022
Sarah F W Shearer, Robert Lindsay, Alison A Bolster
{"title":"SPECT/计算机断层成像伪影的研究及其对SPECT量化的影响。","authors":"Sarah F W Shearer, Robert Lindsay, Alison A Bolster","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During optimisation of L-mode parathyroid imaging, an artefact was identified in retrospective patient single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) which could affect SPECT quantification. This work assessed: (1) H-mode SPECTs for the artefact; (2) differences in the artefact for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I], and with and without non-specific background; and (3) the impact on clinically relevant areas. Parathyroid/thyroid phantom studies were performed for L-mode and H-mode using a Perspex torso with saline bags to mimic non-specific background. SPECT/CTs were acquired with clinical parathyroid protocols and using Hermia software, volumes-of-interest were drawn in thyroid and areas of artefact in all reconstructed SPECTs. Standard uptake values (SUVs) for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I] were measured. Two clinicians reviewed the images and determined the artefact was more prominent within L-mode SPECTs, correlating to a greater spread of SUVs compared to H-mode. No differences were observed for [ 99m Tc] thyroid SUVs between all acquisitions ( P > 0.5). There were differences in SUVs between L-mode and H-mode for [ 123 I] ( P = 0.04) and with and without non-specific background ( P = 0.03). At the area of artefact, SUVs should be zero, however, there were measurable SUVs for L-mode and [ 123 I]. Based on these findings, H-mode proved more robust to artefacts and was preferred for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"1002-1012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of a SPECT/computed tomography imaging artefact and its impact on SPECT quantification.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah F W Shearer, Robert Lindsay, Alison A Bolster\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNM.0000000000002022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During optimisation of L-mode parathyroid imaging, an artefact was identified in retrospective patient single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) which could affect SPECT quantification. This work assessed: (1) H-mode SPECTs for the artefact; (2) differences in the artefact for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I], and with and without non-specific background; and (3) the impact on clinically relevant areas. Parathyroid/thyroid phantom studies were performed for L-mode and H-mode using a Perspex torso with saline bags to mimic non-specific background. SPECT/CTs were acquired with clinical parathyroid protocols and using Hermia software, volumes-of-interest were drawn in thyroid and areas of artefact in all reconstructed SPECTs. Standard uptake values (SUVs) for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I] were measured. Two clinicians reviewed the images and determined the artefact was more prominent within L-mode SPECTs, correlating to a greater spread of SUVs compared to H-mode. No differences were observed for [ 99m Tc] thyroid SUVs between all acquisitions ( P > 0.5). There were differences in SUVs between L-mode and H-mode for [ 123 I] ( P = 0.04) and with and without non-specific background ( P = 0.03). At the area of artefact, SUVs should be zero, however, there were measurable SUVs for L-mode and [ 123 I]. Based on these findings, H-mode proved more robust to artefacts and was preferred for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1002-1012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Medicine Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000002022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在优化l模式甲状旁腺成像过程中,回顾性患者单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)发现了一个影响SPECT量化的伪影。这项工作评估了:(1)工件的h -模SPECTs;(2) [99mTc]和[123I]的伪影差异,以及有无非特定背景;(3)对临床相关领域的影响。在l模式和h模式下,使用有机玻璃躯干和生理盐水袋模拟非特异性背景,进行甲状旁腺/甲状腺幻像研究。采用临床甲状旁腺协议并使用Hermia软件获取SPECT/ ct,在甲状腺和所有重建SPECT中绘制感兴趣的体积和伪影区域。测量了[99mTc]和[123I]的标准摄取值(suv)。两名临床医生检查了图像,确定伪影在l模式spect中更为突出,与h模式相比,suv的分布更广。在所有收购的[99mTc]甲状腺suv之间没有观察到差异(P > 0.5)。[123I]的l -模式与h -模式的suv数量差异(P = 0.04),有无特定背景的suv数量差异(P = 0.03)。在伪影区域,suv应为零,但l模式和[123I]均有可测量的suv。基于这些发现,h模式被证明对伪影具有更强的鲁棒性,是临床实践的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of a SPECT/computed tomography imaging artefact and its impact on SPECT quantification.

During optimisation of L-mode parathyroid imaging, an artefact was identified in retrospective patient single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) which could affect SPECT quantification. This work assessed: (1) H-mode SPECTs for the artefact; (2) differences in the artefact for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I], and with and without non-specific background; and (3) the impact on clinically relevant areas. Parathyroid/thyroid phantom studies were performed for L-mode and H-mode using a Perspex torso with saline bags to mimic non-specific background. SPECT/CTs were acquired with clinical parathyroid protocols and using Hermia software, volumes-of-interest were drawn in thyroid and areas of artefact in all reconstructed SPECTs. Standard uptake values (SUVs) for [ 99m Tc] and [ 123 I] were measured. Two clinicians reviewed the images and determined the artefact was more prominent within L-mode SPECTs, correlating to a greater spread of SUVs compared to H-mode. No differences were observed for [ 99m Tc] thyroid SUVs between all acquisitions ( P > 0.5). There were differences in SUVs between L-mode and H-mode for [ 123 I] ( P = 0.04) and with and without non-specific background ( P = 0.03). At the area of artefact, SUVs should be zero, however, there were measurable SUVs for L-mode and [ 123 I]. Based on these findings, H-mode proved more robust to artefacts and was preferred for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信