儿童和青少年运动员胫骨侧后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的开放与关节镜固定。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251350304
Evan W Beatty, Joshua H Pang, Michael Quinn, Yi-Meng Yen, Dennis E Kramer, Mininder S Kocher, Benton E Heyworth
{"title":"儿童和青少年运动员胫骨侧后交叉韧带撕脱骨折的开放与关节镜固定。","authors":"Evan W Beatty, Joshua H Pang, Michael Quinn, Yi-Meng Yen, Dennis E Kramer, Mininder S Kocher, Benton E Heyworth","doi":"10.1177/23259671251350304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures pose unique technical challenges for surgical fixation in the pediatric and adolescent population. Both arthroscopic and open management have been pursued; nonetheless, the literature is devoid of comparative studies elucidating factors for technique selection or relative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the demographic characteristics, presenting features, clinical course, return to sports (RTS), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications associated with open and arthroscopic fixation cohorts of pediatric patients who sustained an isolated tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A medical record review was performed for all patients aged 8 to 19 years who underwent operative fixation of a tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture between 2003 and 2021 at a single pediatric tertiary referral center. Patients were excluded if they sustained a femoral-sided avulsion fracture, underwent a PCL reconstruction, or presented with multiligamentous knee injury requiring surgical intervention for >1 ligament. All patients were sent 3 PRO instruments validated for children: Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Child, and Hospital for Special Surgery Functional Activity Brief Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 patients were treated with open fixation and 10 with arthroscopic fixation. Also, 15 (75%) patients (7 open, 8 arthroscopic) returned PROs. No differences were detected in demographic characteristics, RTS, or PROs between cohorts. One patient in the open cohort developed a deep-tissue infection in the popliteal fossa, requiring open irrigation and debridement. One patient in the arthroscopic cohort eventually required PCL reconstruction for fracture nonunion associated with persistent instability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No differences in outcomes were detected in this study between cohorts of pediatric patients undergoing open and arthroscopic fixation of tibial-sided PCL avulsion injuries. Regardless of surgical technique, most patients healed without complications and returned to high activity levels. Given the postoperative complications seen in the arthroscopic cohort, further research is needed to investigate the potential biomechanical superiority of open technique fixation constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"23259671251350304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Versus Arthroscopic Fixation of Tibial-Sided Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Avulsion Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Evan W Beatty, Joshua H Pang, Michael Quinn, Yi-Meng Yen, Dennis E Kramer, Mininder S Kocher, Benton E Heyworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671251350304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures pose unique technical challenges for surgical fixation in the pediatric and adolescent population. Both arthroscopic and open management have been pursued; nonetheless, the literature is devoid of comparative studies elucidating factors for technique selection or relative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the demographic characteristics, presenting features, clinical course, return to sports (RTS), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications associated with open and arthroscopic fixation cohorts of pediatric patients who sustained an isolated tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A medical record review was performed for all patients aged 8 to 19 years who underwent operative fixation of a tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture between 2003 and 2021 at a single pediatric tertiary referral center. Patients were excluded if they sustained a femoral-sided avulsion fracture, underwent a PCL reconstruction, or presented with multiligamentous knee injury requiring surgical intervention for >1 ligament. All patients were sent 3 PRO instruments validated for children: Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Child, and Hospital for Special Surgery Functional Activity Brief Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 patients were treated with open fixation and 10 with arthroscopic fixation. Also, 15 (75%) patients (7 open, 8 arthroscopic) returned PROs. No differences were detected in demographic characteristics, RTS, or PROs between cohorts. One patient in the open cohort developed a deep-tissue infection in the popliteal fossa, requiring open irrigation and debridement. One patient in the arthroscopic cohort eventually required PCL reconstruction for fracture nonunion associated with persistent instability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No differences in outcomes were detected in this study between cohorts of pediatric patients undergoing open and arthroscopic fixation of tibial-sided PCL avulsion injuries. Regardless of surgical technique, most patients healed without complications and returned to high activity levels. Given the postoperative complications seen in the arthroscopic cohort, further research is needed to investigate the potential biomechanical superiority of open technique fixation constructs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"23259671251350304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251350304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251350304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:后十字韧带撕脱骨折对儿童和青少年的手术固定提出了独特的技术挑战。关节镜和开放治疗均已进行;然而,文献缺乏阐明技术选择因素或相对结果的比较研究。目的:比较孤立性胫骨侧PCL撕脱性骨折的儿童患者的人口学特征、表现特征、临床病程、重返运动(RTS)、患者报告的结果(PROs)以及与开放和关节镜固定队列相关的并发症。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:对2003年至2021年间在单一儿科三级转诊中心接受胫骨侧PCL撕脱骨折手术固定的所有8至19岁患者的医疗记录进行回顾。如果患者持续股骨侧撕脱骨折,进行了PCL重建,或出现多韧带膝关节损伤,需要手术干预bbb1韧带,则排除患者。所有患者均使用3种经儿童验证的PRO仪器:儿科国际膝关节文献委员会、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分-儿童和特殊外科医院功能活动简要量表。结果:共有20例患者符合纳入标准,其中10例采用切开固定,10例采用关节镜固定。15例(75%)患者(7例切开手术,8例关节镜下手术)返回PROs。在人群统计学特征、RTS或PROs方面没有发现差异。开放队列中有1例患者腘窝深部组织感染,需要开放冲洗和清创。在关节镜队列中,有1例患者因骨折不愈合伴持续性不稳定最终需要PCL重建。结论:在本研究中,接受开放和关节镜固定治疗胫骨侧PCL撕脱伤的儿科患者队列之间的结果没有差异。无论采用何种手术技术,大多数患者均无并发症愈合,并恢复了高活动水平。考虑到关节镜组术后并发症,需要进一步研究开放式技术固定装置潜在的生物力学优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open Versus Arthroscopic Fixation of Tibial-Sided Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) Avulsion Fractures in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes.

Background: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures pose unique technical challenges for surgical fixation in the pediatric and adolescent population. Both arthroscopic and open management have been pursued; nonetheless, the literature is devoid of comparative studies elucidating factors for technique selection or relative outcomes.

Purpose: To compare the demographic characteristics, presenting features, clinical course, return to sports (RTS), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications associated with open and arthroscopic fixation cohorts of pediatric patients who sustained an isolated tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A medical record review was performed for all patients aged 8 to 19 years who underwent operative fixation of a tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture between 2003 and 2021 at a single pediatric tertiary referral center. Patients were excluded if they sustained a femoral-sided avulsion fracture, underwent a PCL reconstruction, or presented with multiligamentous knee injury requiring surgical intervention for >1 ligament. All patients were sent 3 PRO instruments validated for children: Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Child, and Hospital for Special Surgery Functional Activity Brief Scale.

Results: A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 10 patients were treated with open fixation and 10 with arthroscopic fixation. Also, 15 (75%) patients (7 open, 8 arthroscopic) returned PROs. No differences were detected in demographic characteristics, RTS, or PROs between cohorts. One patient in the open cohort developed a deep-tissue infection in the popliteal fossa, requiring open irrigation and debridement. One patient in the arthroscopic cohort eventually required PCL reconstruction for fracture nonunion associated with persistent instability.

Conclusion: No differences in outcomes were detected in this study between cohorts of pediatric patients undergoing open and arthroscopic fixation of tibial-sided PCL avulsion injuries. Regardless of surgical technique, most patients healed without complications and returned to high activity levels. Given the postoperative complications seen in the arthroscopic cohort, further research is needed to investigate the potential biomechanical superiority of open technique fixation constructs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信