在二十年的临床试验中评估胶质母细胞瘤预后的时间趋势偏差。

IF 16.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giacomo Sferruzza, Karthik Desingu, Andrés Cubero Cruz, Gaetano Finocchiaro
{"title":"在二十年的临床试验中评估胶质母细胞瘤预后的时间趋势偏差。","authors":"Giacomo Sferruzza, Karthik Desingu, Andrés Cubero Cruz, Gaetano Finocchiaro","doi":"10.1093/neuonc/noaf158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The time-trend bias represents a potential limitation in the use of external controls in glioblastoma (GBM) trials. In this study, we assessed whether outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) patients treated with the standard Stupp protocol in clinical trials have changed over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved individual patient survival pseudo-data from Stupp protocol arms reported in trials published over the last twenty years. Survival distributions were approximated using Weibull distributions, and an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model was used to evaluate any potential time trend by correcting for identified key prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MGMT methylation status and Karnofsky Performance Status emerged as the main determinants of survival differences among clinical trials. Both in a multivariable regression that included all candidate prognostic factors and after adjustment for the main determinants, publication year showed no impact on the outcome of the Stuppprotocol control arms. The performance of the model was validated using three independent Phase 3 cohorts, providing additional evidence for the absence of time-trend bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No evidence of time-trend bias was observed in Phase 3 GBM trials over the past two decades once major prognostic factors were accounted for.</p>","PeriodicalId":19377,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing time-trend bias in glioblastoma prognosis over two decades of clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Giacomo Sferruzza, Karthik Desingu, Andrés Cubero Cruz, Gaetano Finocchiaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/neuonc/noaf158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The time-trend bias represents a potential limitation in the use of external controls in glioblastoma (GBM) trials. In this study, we assessed whether outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) patients treated with the standard Stupp protocol in clinical trials have changed over the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved individual patient survival pseudo-data from Stupp protocol arms reported in trials published over the last twenty years. Survival distributions were approximated using Weibull distributions, and an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model was used to evaluate any potential time trend by correcting for identified key prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MGMT methylation status and Karnofsky Performance Status emerged as the main determinants of survival differences among clinical trials. Both in a multivariable regression that included all candidate prognostic factors and after adjustment for the main determinants, publication year showed no impact on the outcome of the Stuppprotocol control arms. The performance of the model was validated using three independent Phase 3 cohorts, providing additional evidence for the absence of time-trend bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No evidence of time-trend bias was observed in Phase 3 GBM trials over the past two decades once major prognostic factors were accounted for.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf158\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf158","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:时间趋势偏差代表了在胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)试验中使用外部对照的潜在限制。在这项研究中,我们评估了在过去的二十年中,在临床试验中使用标准Stupp方案治疗的新诊断GBM (ndGBM)患者的结局是否发生了变化。方法:我们从过去20年发表的试验中报道的Stupp方案组中检索了个体患者的生存伪数据。生存分布使用威布尔分布近似,加速失效时间(AFT)模型通过校正确定的关键预后因素来评估任何潜在的时间趋势。结果:MGMT甲基化状态和Karnofsky性能状态是临床试验中生存差异的主要决定因素。在包括所有候选预后因素的多变量回归和对主要决定因素进行调整后,出版年份对Stuppprotocol对照组的结果没有影响。使用三个独立的3期队列验证了模型的性能,为不存在时间趋势偏差提供了额外的证据。结论:考虑到主要预后因素后,在过去20年的3期GBM试验中没有观察到时间趋势偏差的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing time-trend bias in glioblastoma prognosis over two decades of clinical trials.

Background: The time-trend bias represents a potential limitation in the use of external controls in glioblastoma (GBM) trials. In this study, we assessed whether outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) patients treated with the standard Stupp protocol in clinical trials have changed over the past two decades.

Methods: We retrieved individual patient survival pseudo-data from Stupp protocol arms reported in trials published over the last twenty years. Survival distributions were approximated using Weibull distributions, and an Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model was used to evaluate any potential time trend by correcting for identified key prognostic factors.

Results: MGMT methylation status and Karnofsky Performance Status emerged as the main determinants of survival differences among clinical trials. Both in a multivariable regression that included all candidate prognostic factors and after adjustment for the main determinants, publication year showed no impact on the outcome of the Stuppprotocol control arms. The performance of the model was validated using three independent Phase 3 cohorts, providing additional evidence for the absence of time-trend bias.

Conclusions: No evidence of time-trend bias was observed in Phase 3 GBM trials over the past two decades once major prognostic factors were accounted for.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology
Neuro-oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
27.20
自引率
6.30%
发文量
1434
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology, the official journal of the Society for Neuro-Oncology, has been published monthly since January 2010. Affiliated with the Japan Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology, it is a global leader in the field. The journal is committed to swiftly disseminating high-quality information across all areas of neuro-oncology. It features peer-reviewed articles, reviews, symposia on various topics, abstracts from annual meetings, and updates from neuro-oncology societies worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信