肩关节镜术后PENG阻滞与肩胛上神经阻滞镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ibrahim Topcu, Bilal Kasapoglu, Ozlem M Eksi, Yaser Pektas, Sema N Baki, Gokhan Sertcakacilar
{"title":"肩关节镜术后PENG阻滞与肩胛上神经阻滞镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ibrahim Topcu, Bilal Kasapoglu, Ozlem M Eksi, Yaser Pektas, Sema N Baki, Gokhan Sertcakacilar","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18879-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients commonly experience moderate to severe pain following shoulder arthroscopy. It is possible to reduce opioid consumption and hospital stay by using regional analgesia techniques in pain management. Currently, the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is widely used as an effective method to provide analgesia in shoulder surgeries. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, on the other hand, is a newly described technique, and there is insufficient clinical research regarding its postoperative analgesic efficacy. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of SSNB and PENG blocks following shoulder arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial, 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were randomized into SSNB and PENG groups under ultrasound guidance. Postoperative pain was managed with tramadol HCl intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and paracetamol as rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption during the first 36 hours postoperatively and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the SSNB and PENG groups in terms of postoperative pain scores (P=0.307). Cumulative opioid consumption and patient satisfaction were also similar between the two groups (P=0.307, P=0.397, respectively). However, the PENG block group had significantly shorter procedure times and lower pain scores during the block procedure compared to the SSNB group (P=0.045, P=0.032, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that the PENG block, performed under ultrasound guidance, provided similar pain relief and opioid consumption reduction up to 36 hours postoperatively in various arthroscopic shoulder surgeries, including rotator cuff repair, Bankart repair, frozen shoulder, and impingement syndrome, compared to the SSNB. Given its shorter procedure time, less procedural pain, and similar clinical outcomes, the PENG block can be considered a good alternative to SSNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy between PENG block and suprascapular nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ibrahim Topcu, Bilal Kasapoglu, Ozlem M Eksi, Yaser Pektas, Sema N Baki, Gokhan Sertcakacilar\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18879-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients commonly experience moderate to severe pain following shoulder arthroscopy. It is possible to reduce opioid consumption and hospital stay by using regional analgesia techniques in pain management. Currently, the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is widely used as an effective method to provide analgesia in shoulder surgeries. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, on the other hand, is a newly described technique, and there is insufficient clinical research regarding its postoperative analgesic efficacy. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of SSNB and PENG blocks following shoulder arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial, 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were randomized into SSNB and PENG groups under ultrasound guidance. Postoperative pain was managed with tramadol HCl intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and paracetamol as rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption during the first 36 hours postoperatively and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between the SSNB and PENG groups in terms of postoperative pain scores (P=0.307). Cumulative opioid consumption and patient satisfaction were also similar between the two groups (P=0.307, P=0.397, respectively). However, the PENG block group had significantly shorter procedure times and lower pain scores during the block procedure compared to the SSNB group (P=0.045, P=0.032, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that the PENG block, performed under ultrasound guidance, provided similar pain relief and opioid consumption reduction up to 36 hours postoperatively in various arthroscopic shoulder surgeries, including rotator cuff repair, Bankart repair, frozen shoulder, and impingement syndrome, compared to the SSNB. Given its shorter procedure time, less procedural pain, and similar clinical outcomes, the PENG block can be considered a good alternative to SSNB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva anestesiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18879-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.18879-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩关节镜术后患者通常会出现中度至重度疼痛。通过在疼痛管理中使用局部镇痛技术,可以减少阿片类药物的消耗和住院时间。肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)是目前肩关节手术中广泛应用的一种有效的镇痛方法。另一方面,囊周神经阻滞(PENG)是一种新描述的技术,其术后镇痛效果的临床研究不足。本研究旨在比较SSNB和PENG阻滞肩关节镜术后的镇痛效果。方法:前瞻性、随机、对照、单中心临床试验,74例肩关节镜患者在超声引导下随机分为SSNB组和PENG组。术后疼痛采用曲马多盐酸静脉自控镇痛(PCA)和扑热息痛作为镇痛。主要结局为术后疼痛评分。次要结局包括术后前36小时内阿片类药物的累积消耗和患者满意度。结果:SSNB组与PENG组术后疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.307)。两组患者累积阿片类药物使用量和患者满意度相似(P=0.307, P=0.397)。然而,与SSNB组相比,彭阻滞组在阻滞过程中的手术时间和疼痛评分明显更短(P=0.045, P=0.032)。结论:本研究表明,与SSNB相比,在超声引导下进行的PENG阻滞在各种关节镜肩关节手术(包括肩袖修复、Bankart修复、肩周炎和撞击综合征)术后36小时内提供了相似的疼痛缓解和阿片类药物消耗减少。鉴于其手术时间短,手术疼痛少,临床结果相似,PENG阻滞可以被认为是SSNB的一个很好的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of postoperative analgesic efficacy between PENG block and suprascapular nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Patients commonly experience moderate to severe pain following shoulder arthroscopy. It is possible to reduce opioid consumption and hospital stay by using regional analgesia techniques in pain management. Currently, the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is widely used as an effective method to provide analgesia in shoulder surgeries. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, on the other hand, is a newly described technique, and there is insufficient clinical research regarding its postoperative analgesic efficacy. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of SSNB and PENG blocks following shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial, 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy were randomized into SSNB and PENG groups under ultrasound guidance. Postoperative pain was managed with tramadol HCl intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and paracetamol as rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption during the first 36 hours postoperatively and patient satisfaction.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the SSNB and PENG groups in terms of postoperative pain scores (P=0.307). Cumulative opioid consumption and patient satisfaction were also similar between the two groups (P=0.307, P=0.397, respectively). However, the PENG block group had significantly shorter procedure times and lower pain scores during the block procedure compared to the SSNB group (P=0.045, P=0.032, respectively).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the PENG block, performed under ultrasound guidance, provided similar pain relief and opioid consumption reduction up to 36 hours postoperatively in various arthroscopic shoulder surgeries, including rotator cuff repair, Bankart repair, frozen shoulder, and impingement syndrome, compared to the SSNB. Given its shorter procedure time, less procedural pain, and similar clinical outcomes, the PENG block can be considered a good alternative to SSNB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信