长期使用-受体阻滞剂可降低术后死亡率,而术前使用-受体阻滞剂并不能改善胸血管内主动脉修复的预后。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sabrina Straus, Marc Farah, Kanhua Yin, Ann Gaffey, Marc Schermerhorn, Mahmoud Malas
{"title":"长期使用-受体阻滞剂可降低术后死亡率,而术前使用-受体阻滞剂并不能改善胸血管内主动脉修复的预后。","authors":"Sabrina Straus, Marc Farah, Kanhua Yin, Ann Gaffey, Marc Schermerhorn, Mahmoud Malas","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Beta-blockers play a pivotal role in reducing perioperative cardiac complications; however, their impact on outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair remains unknown. Utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database, our study aims to uncover the impact and determine the optimal timeframe for initiating beta-blocker therapy prior to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,724 thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients (2016-2023) were grouped as follows: non-beta-blocker users (NBB), beta-blocker initiators ≤30 days prior to procedure (I30), and long-term beta-blocker users for >30 days prior to procedure (L30). Primary outcomes were in-hospital death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and spinal cord ischemia. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, bowel ischemia, leg ischemia, and prolonged length of stay (≥2 days). A sub-analysis was conducted to assess the influence of beta-blocker use by thoracic endovascular aortic repair indication: Type B aortic dissection and thoracic aortic aneurysm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to control for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,480 NBB (31%), 778 I30 (16%), and 2,466 L30 (52%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, I30 patients showed no significant postoperative complication reduction compared to NBB. In contrast, L30 patients had reduced odds of perioperative death (aOR=0.62 [95% CI: 0.40-0.94]; p=0.025), pulmonary complications (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.82]; p=0.002), and bowel ischemia (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.12-0.73]; p=0.009), but had higher rates of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=1.99 [95% CI: 1.19-3.49]; p=0.038), compared to NBB. When stratified by indication, L30 Type B aortic dissection patients were associated with decreased risks of death (aOR=0.42 [95% CI: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.041), stroke (aOR=0.29 [95% CI: 0.09-0.92]; p=0.039), and pulmonary complications (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.13-0.69]; p=0.004) compared to NBB. Among thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, L30 was associated with higher odds of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=3.09 [95% CI: 1.34-8.40]; p=0.014) compared with NBB, but no impact on stroke or death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term use of beta-blockers was associated with lower perioperative mortality but higher spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Type B aortic dissection patients had the additional benefit of lower stroke rates without increased spinal cord ischemia. In contrast, initiating beta-blockers preoperatively, independent of pathology, was not associated with improved outcomes. While further prospective studies are necessary, these results indicate that patients should continue their beta-blocker regimen before undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and appropriate management of spinal perfusion pressure should be ensured perioperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Beta Blocker Use Lowers Postoperative Mortality While Initiating Beta Blockers Preoperatively Does Not Improve Outcomes in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Straus, Marc Farah, Kanhua Yin, Ann Gaffey, Marc Schermerhorn, Mahmoud Malas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Beta-blockers play a pivotal role in reducing perioperative cardiac complications; however, their impact on outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair remains unknown. Utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database, our study aims to uncover the impact and determine the optimal timeframe for initiating beta-blocker therapy prior to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 4,724 thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients (2016-2023) were grouped as follows: non-beta-blocker users (NBB), beta-blocker initiators ≤30 days prior to procedure (I30), and long-term beta-blocker users for >30 days prior to procedure (L30). Primary outcomes were in-hospital death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and spinal cord ischemia. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, bowel ischemia, leg ischemia, and prolonged length of stay (≥2 days). A sub-analysis was conducted to assess the influence of beta-blocker use by thoracic endovascular aortic repair indication: Type B aortic dissection and thoracic aortic aneurysm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to control for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,480 NBB (31%), 778 I30 (16%), and 2,466 L30 (52%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, I30 patients showed no significant postoperative complication reduction compared to NBB. In contrast, L30 patients had reduced odds of perioperative death (aOR=0.62 [95% CI: 0.40-0.94]; p=0.025), pulmonary complications (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.82]; p=0.002), and bowel ischemia (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.12-0.73]; p=0.009), but had higher rates of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=1.99 [95% CI: 1.19-3.49]; p=0.038), compared to NBB. When stratified by indication, L30 Type B aortic dissection patients were associated with decreased risks of death (aOR=0.42 [95% CI: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.041), stroke (aOR=0.29 [95% CI: 0.09-0.92]; p=0.039), and pulmonary complications (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.13-0.69]; p=0.004) compared to NBB. Among thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, L30 was associated with higher odds of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=3.09 [95% CI: 1.34-8.40]; p=0.014) compared with NBB, but no impact on stroke or death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term use of beta-blockers was associated with lower perioperative mortality but higher spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Type B aortic dissection patients had the additional benefit of lower stroke rates without increased spinal cord ischemia. In contrast, initiating beta-blockers preoperatively, independent of pathology, was not associated with improved outcomes. While further prospective studies are necessary, these results indicate that patients should continue their beta-blocker regimen before undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and appropriate management of spinal perfusion pressure should be ensured perioperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:β受体阻滞剂在减少围手术期心脏并发症中起关键作用;然而,它们对胸血管内主动脉修复后预后的影响尚不清楚。利用血管质量倡议数据库,我们的研究旨在揭示影响,并确定在胸椎血管内主动脉修复之前开始β受体阻滞剂治疗的最佳时间框架。方法:共4724例胸椎血管内主动脉修复患者(2016-2023)分为:非-受体阻滞剂使用者(NBB), -受体阻滞剂启动者术前≤30天(I30), -受体阻滞剂长期使用者术前30天(L30)。主要结局是院内死亡、中风、心肌梗死和脊髓缺血。次要结局包括肺部并发症、心脏并发症、肠缺血、腿部缺血和住院时间延长(≥2天)。我们进行了一项亚分析来评估-受体阻滞剂使用对胸血管内主动脉修复指征(B型主动脉夹层和胸主动脉瘤)的影响。采用多变量logistic回归分析控制混杂变量。结果:我们确定了1,480例NBB(31%), 778例I30(16%)和2,466例L30(52%)患者。在调整混杂因素后,与NBB相比,I30例患者的术后并发症没有明显减少。相比之下,L30例患者围手术期死亡的几率较低(aOR=0.62 [95% CI: 0.40-0.94];p=0.025),肺部并发症(aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.82];p=0.002),肠缺血(aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.12-0.73];p=0.009),但脊髓缺血发生率较高(aOR=1.99 [95% CI: 1.19-3.49];p=0.038),与NBB相比。按适应症分层时,L30型B型主动脉夹层患者的死亡风险降低相关(aOR=0.42 [95% CI: 0.18-0.97];p=0.041)、中风(aOR=0.29 [95% CI: 0.09-0.92];p=0.039),肺部并发症(aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.13-0.69];p=0.004)。在胸主动脉瘤患者中,L30与脊髓缺血发生率增高相关(aOR=3.09 [95% CI: 1.34-8.40];p=0.014),但对卒中和死亡无影响。结论:长期使用-受体阻滞剂可降低围手术期死亡率,但增加胸血管内主动脉修复术后脊髓缺血。B型主动脉夹层患者在不增加脊髓缺血的情况下卒中发生率较低。相比之下,术前启动β受体阻滞剂,独立于病理,与改善的结果无关。虽然进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的,但这些结果表明,患者在接受胸椎血管内主动脉修复前应继续服用β受体阻滞剂,并应确保围手术期适当管理脊柱灌注压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term Beta Blocker Use Lowers Postoperative Mortality While Initiating Beta Blockers Preoperatively Does Not Improve Outcomes in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

Objective: Beta-blockers play a pivotal role in reducing perioperative cardiac complications; however, their impact on outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair remains unknown. Utilizing the Vascular Quality Initiative database, our study aims to uncover the impact and determine the optimal timeframe for initiating beta-blocker therapy prior to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Methods: A total of 4,724 thoracic endovascular aortic repair patients (2016-2023) were grouped as follows: non-beta-blocker users (NBB), beta-blocker initiators ≤30 days prior to procedure (I30), and long-term beta-blocker users for >30 days prior to procedure (L30). Primary outcomes were in-hospital death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and spinal cord ischemia. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, bowel ischemia, leg ischemia, and prolonged length of stay (≥2 days). A sub-analysis was conducted to assess the influence of beta-blocker use by thoracic endovascular aortic repair indication: Type B aortic dissection and thoracic aortic aneurysm. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to control for confounding variables.

Results: We identified 1,480 NBB (31%), 778 I30 (16%), and 2,466 L30 (52%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, I30 patients showed no significant postoperative complication reduction compared to NBB. In contrast, L30 patients had reduced odds of perioperative death (aOR=0.62 [95% CI: 0.40-0.94]; p=0.025), pulmonary complications (aOR=0.60 [95% CI: 0.43-0.82]; p=0.002), and bowel ischemia (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.12-0.73]; p=0.009), but had higher rates of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=1.99 [95% CI: 1.19-3.49]; p=0.038), compared to NBB. When stratified by indication, L30 Type B aortic dissection patients were associated with decreased risks of death (aOR=0.42 [95% CI: 0.18-0.97]; p=0.041), stroke (aOR=0.29 [95% CI: 0.09-0.92]; p=0.039), and pulmonary complications (aOR=0.30 [95% CI: 0.13-0.69]; p=0.004) compared to NBB. Among thoracic aortic aneurysm patients, L30 was associated with higher odds of spinal cord ischemia (aOR=3.09 [95% CI: 1.34-8.40]; p=0.014) compared with NBB, but no impact on stroke or death.

Conclusions: Long-term use of beta-blockers was associated with lower perioperative mortality but higher spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Type B aortic dissection patients had the additional benefit of lower stroke rates without increased spinal cord ischemia. In contrast, initiating beta-blockers preoperatively, independent of pathology, was not associated with improved outcomes. While further prospective studies are necessary, these results indicate that patients should continue their beta-blocker regimen before undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and appropriate management of spinal perfusion pressure should be ensured perioperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信