水牛脑震荡跑步机测试的表现和生理反应可以识别普通成人轻度创伤性脑损伤的自主神经功能障碍:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sally Vuu, Maayken E L van den Berg, Selena Hutchins, Joanne Howie, Claire Gough, Christopher J Barr
{"title":"水牛脑震荡跑步机测试的表现和生理反应可以识别普通成人轻度创伤性脑损伤的自主神经功能障碍:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Sally Vuu, Maayken E L van den Berg, Selena Hutchins, Joanne Howie, Claire Gough, Christopher J Barr","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the underlying mechanisms impacting on the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) performance in a general adult population with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient TBI rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-one adults with mild TBI, 17 healthy active adults, and 14 healthy sedentary adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study comparing BCTT performance and associated physiological responses between 3 participant groups.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>During a single BCTT session, test duration, reason for test termination, age-predicted maximum heart rate (HR), and HR recovery (HRR) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two adults (60.8% male, mean ± SD age: 37.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. The group with mild TBI demonstrated a significantly shorter test duration (10.8 ± 5.7 min) compared to the healthy active (14.1 ± 2.9 min) and sedentary (11.6 ± 3.0 min) groups (P < .05). Eight participants (38.1%) stopped due to symptom exacerbation. The group with mild TBI had a significantly (P < .05) lower age-predicted maximum HR (84.3 ± 9.8%), compared to both healthy active (90.0 ± 0.2%) and sedentary adults (89.3 ± 2.8%) at test termination. Fast and slow phase HRR were significantly better in the healthy active group (fast: 69.6 ± 18.2 beats per minute [bpm], slow: 79.0 ± 13.8 bpm) compared to both the mild TBI (fast: 44.5 ± 18.7 bpm, slow: 61.1 ± 20.4 bpm) and healthy sedentary groups (fast 49.6 ± 20.1 bpm, slow 63.0 ± 11.7 bpm) (P < .05), with no significant difference between adults with mild TBI and healthy sedentary groups. When controlling for levels of physical activity there was no longer a detectable significant difference between the healthy active and sedentary groups in HRR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the inability to exercise to a threshold HR of 90% of an individual's age-predicted maximum HR is a better indicator of autonomic dysfunction. HRR may be prolonged in those with a mild TBI, but caution should be taken if attributing this to physiological dysfunction as the predominant factor appears to be physical activity levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and Physiological Response to the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test Can Identify Autonomic Dysfunction in the General Adult Population With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sally Vuu, Maayken E L van den Berg, Selena Hutchins, Joanne Howie, Claire Gough, Christopher J Barr\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the underlying mechanisms impacting on the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) performance in a general adult population with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient TBI rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-one adults with mild TBI, 17 healthy active adults, and 14 healthy sedentary adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study comparing BCTT performance and associated physiological responses between 3 participant groups.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>During a single BCTT session, test duration, reason for test termination, age-predicted maximum heart rate (HR), and HR recovery (HRR) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two adults (60.8% male, mean ± SD age: 37.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. The group with mild TBI demonstrated a significantly shorter test duration (10.8 ± 5.7 min) compared to the healthy active (14.1 ± 2.9 min) and sedentary (11.6 ± 3.0 min) groups (P < .05). Eight participants (38.1%) stopped due to symptom exacerbation. The group with mild TBI had a significantly (P < .05) lower age-predicted maximum HR (84.3 ± 9.8%), compared to both healthy active (90.0 ± 0.2%) and sedentary adults (89.3 ± 2.8%) at test termination. Fast and slow phase HRR were significantly better in the healthy active group (fast: 69.6 ± 18.2 beats per minute [bpm], slow: 79.0 ± 13.8 bpm) compared to both the mild TBI (fast: 44.5 ± 18.7 bpm, slow: 61.1 ± 20.4 bpm) and healthy sedentary groups (fast 49.6 ± 20.1 bpm, slow 63.0 ± 11.7 bpm) (P < .05), with no significant difference between adults with mild TBI and healthy sedentary groups. When controlling for levels of physical activity there was no longer a detectable significant difference between the healthy active and sedentary groups in HRR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the inability to exercise to a threshold HR of 90% of an individual's age-predicted maximum HR is a better indicator of autonomic dysfunction. HRR may be prolonged in those with a mild TBI, but caution should be taken if attributing this to physiological dysfunction as the predominant factor appears to be physical activity levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001076\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨影响普通成年轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者水牛脑震荡跑步机测试(Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test, BCTT)成绩的潜在机制。设置:门诊TBI康复服务。参与者:21名患有轻度脑外伤的成年人,17名健康活跃的成年人,14名健康久坐不动的成年人。设计:前瞻性观察研究,比较3组参与者的BCTT表现和相关生理反应。主要测量方法:在单次BCTT期间,记录试验持续时间、试验终止原因、年龄预测最大心率(HR)和心率恢复(HRR)。结果:共纳入成人52例(男性60.8%,平均±SD年龄37.8±14.6岁)。与健康运动组(14.1±2.9分钟)和久坐组(11.6±3.0分钟)相比,轻度TBI组的测试持续时间(10.8±5.7分钟)显著缩短(P)。结论:该研究表明,不能运动阈值HR为个体年龄预测最大HR的90%是自主神经功能障碍的更好指标。轻度脑外伤患者的HRR可能会延长,但如果将其归因于生理功能障碍,则应谨慎,因为主要因素似乎是体力活动水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and Physiological Response to the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test Can Identify Autonomic Dysfunction in the General Adult Population With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.

Objective: To explore the underlying mechanisms impacting on the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) performance in a general adult population with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Setting: Outpatient TBI rehabilitation service.

Participants: Twenty-one adults with mild TBI, 17 healthy active adults, and 14 healthy sedentary adults.

Design: Prospective observational study comparing BCTT performance and associated physiological responses between 3 participant groups.

Main measures: During a single BCTT session, test duration, reason for test termination, age-predicted maximum heart rate (HR), and HR recovery (HRR) were recorded.

Results: Fifty-two adults (60.8% male, mean ± SD age: 37.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. The group with mild TBI demonstrated a significantly shorter test duration (10.8 ± 5.7 min) compared to the healthy active (14.1 ± 2.9 min) and sedentary (11.6 ± 3.0 min) groups (P < .05). Eight participants (38.1%) stopped due to symptom exacerbation. The group with mild TBI had a significantly (P < .05) lower age-predicted maximum HR (84.3 ± 9.8%), compared to both healthy active (90.0 ± 0.2%) and sedentary adults (89.3 ± 2.8%) at test termination. Fast and slow phase HRR were significantly better in the healthy active group (fast: 69.6 ± 18.2 beats per minute [bpm], slow: 79.0 ± 13.8 bpm) compared to both the mild TBI (fast: 44.5 ± 18.7 bpm, slow: 61.1 ± 20.4 bpm) and healthy sedentary groups (fast 49.6 ± 20.1 bpm, slow 63.0 ± 11.7 bpm) (P < .05), with no significant difference between adults with mild TBI and healthy sedentary groups. When controlling for levels of physical activity there was no longer a detectable significant difference between the healthy active and sedentary groups in HRR.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the inability to exercise to a threshold HR of 90% of an individual's age-predicted maximum HR is a better indicator of autonomic dysfunction. HRR may be prolonged in those with a mild TBI, but caution should be taken if attributing this to physiological dysfunction as the predominant factor appears to be physical activity levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信