依从性对哮喘控制的影响:更多的患者知识,更多的依从性,更多的控制。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zeynep Celebi Sozener, Omur Aydin, Gulfem Elif Celik, Dilsad Mungan
{"title":"依从性对哮喘控制的影响:更多的患者知识,更多的依从性,更多的控制。","authors":"Zeynep Celebi Sozener, Omur Aydin, Gulfem Elif Celik, Dilsad Mungan","doi":"10.1111/imj.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low adherence rates in addition to inhaler misuse is a crucial problem in asthma management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate medication adherence and correct inhaler use and the relationship between adherence, asthma control and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, demographic characteristics of patients with asthma, asthma control and severe asthma rates were recorded. Patients were categorised as non-adherent, adherent to one component (either subjectively or objectively adherent), adherent to two components or full adherent based on objective, subjective and correct inhaler device use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 304 patients with a mean age of 50.21 ± 12.53 years and disease duration of 12.67 ± 9.47 years. The rate of objective adherence, subjective adherence and correct inhaler use was 45.3%, 67.7% and 56.5% respectively. Overall, we found that 26% of the patients were non-adherent, 18.7% showed subjective or objective adherence, 28.8% adhered to two components, and 27% demonstrated full adherence. The risk of non-adherence was 3.1 times higher in uncontrolled patients, and regular clinician visits reduced the risk of non-adherence by 66%. Adherence was negatively associated with severe asthma rates in our cohort. The rate of correct inhaler device use was lower in patients with systemic comorbidities, while there was no difference in objective adherence, subjective adherence or full adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study revealed that correct, consistent and regular use of inhalers in accordance with clinician recommendations is important in achieving control in patients with asthma. To increase adherence in asthma, regular clinician visits and repeat training should be encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of adherence on asthma control: more patient knowledge, more adherence, more control.\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Celebi Sozener, Omur Aydin, Gulfem Elif Celik, Dilsad Mungan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low adherence rates in addition to inhaler misuse is a crucial problem in asthma management.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate medication adherence and correct inhaler use and the relationship between adherence, asthma control and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, demographic characteristics of patients with asthma, asthma control and severe asthma rates were recorded. Patients were categorised as non-adherent, adherent to one component (either subjectively or objectively adherent), adherent to two components or full adherent based on objective, subjective and correct inhaler device use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 304 patients with a mean age of 50.21 ± 12.53 years and disease duration of 12.67 ± 9.47 years. The rate of objective adherence, subjective adherence and correct inhaler use was 45.3%, 67.7% and 56.5% respectively. Overall, we found that 26% of the patients were non-adherent, 18.7% showed subjective or objective adherence, 28.8% adhered to two components, and 27% demonstrated full adherence. The risk of non-adherence was 3.1 times higher in uncontrolled patients, and regular clinician visits reduced the risk of non-adherence by 66%. Adherence was negatively associated with severe asthma rates in our cohort. The rate of correct inhaler device use was lower in patients with systemic comorbidities, while there was no difference in objective adherence, subjective adherence or full adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study revealed that correct, consistent and regular use of inhalers in accordance with clinician recommendations is important in achieving control in patients with asthma. To increase adherence in asthma, regular clinician visits and repeat training should be encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低依从率和吸入器滥用是哮喘管理中的一个关键问题。目的:探讨药物依从性和正确使用吸入器,以及依从性与哮喘控制和疾病严重程度的关系。方法:在横断面研究中,记录哮喘患者的人口学特征,哮喘控制和严重哮喘发生率。根据客观、主观和正确的吸入器装置使用情况,将患者分为非黏附、黏附一种成分(主观或客观)、黏附两种成分或完全黏附。结果:304例患者入组,平均年龄50.21±12.53岁,病程12.67±9.47年。客观依从率为45.3%,主观依从率为67.7%,正确使用吸入器率为56.5%。总的来说,我们发现26%的患者没有依从,18.7%的患者表现出主观或客观的依从性,28.8%的患者坚持两种成分,27%的患者表现出完全的依从性。未受控制的患者不遵医嘱的风险高出3.1倍,而定期的临床医生就诊使不遵医嘱的风险降低了66%。在我们的队列中,依从性与严重哮喘发病率呈负相关。在有全身性合并症的患者中,正确使用吸入器的比例较低,而在客观依从性、主观依从性或完全依从性方面没有差异。结论:本研究结果显示,按照临床医生的建议正确、一致和定期使用吸入器对于实现哮喘患者的控制非常重要。为了增加对哮喘的依从性,应鼓励定期的临床医生访问和重复培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of adherence on asthma control: more patient knowledge, more adherence, more control.

Background: Low adherence rates in addition to inhaler misuse is a crucial problem in asthma management.

Aims: To investigate medication adherence and correct inhaler use and the relationship between adherence, asthma control and disease severity.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, demographic characteristics of patients with asthma, asthma control and severe asthma rates were recorded. Patients were categorised as non-adherent, adherent to one component (either subjectively or objectively adherent), adherent to two components or full adherent based on objective, subjective and correct inhaler device use.

Results: The study included 304 patients with a mean age of 50.21 ± 12.53 years and disease duration of 12.67 ± 9.47 years. The rate of objective adherence, subjective adherence and correct inhaler use was 45.3%, 67.7% and 56.5% respectively. Overall, we found that 26% of the patients were non-adherent, 18.7% showed subjective or objective adherence, 28.8% adhered to two components, and 27% demonstrated full adherence. The risk of non-adherence was 3.1 times higher in uncontrolled patients, and regular clinician visits reduced the risk of non-adherence by 66%. Adherence was negatively associated with severe asthma rates in our cohort. The rate of correct inhaler device use was lower in patients with systemic comorbidities, while there was no difference in objective adherence, subjective adherence or full adherence.

Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that correct, consistent and regular use of inhalers in accordance with clinician recommendations is important in achieving control in patients with asthma. To increase adherence in asthma, regular clinician visits and repeat training should be encouraged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信