全球卫生的“苏格兰做法”:对全球卫生伙伴关系框架的范围审查。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069
Kristina Kim, Kaveri Qureshi, Emily Adrion, Goran Zangana, Sudeepa Abeysinghe
{"title":"全球卫生的“苏格兰做法”:对全球卫生伙伴关系框架的范围审查。","authors":"Kristina Kim, Kaveri Qureshi, Emily Adrion, Goran Zangana, Sudeepa Abeysinghe","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The narrative framings of partnerships and interventions in global health shed light on actors' conceptualisations of international development. Ideas of equity and justice in North-South partnerships are increasingly centred in international development and global health policy approaches. However, the extent to which these are evident within practice requires further investigation. This paper critically examines published work from health actors based in Scotland conducted within low - and middle-income countries (LMICs), under a Scottish government policy context currently promoted as engaging in a novel approach to international development. The paper uses a scoping review to analyse Scottish actors' engagement and framing of global health interventions and partnerships with LMIC actors. A majority of the texts discussed Scottish-affiliated global health partnerships and/or interventions in the Malawian medical education and clinical medicine context and focused on capacity building and knowledge transfer. Authors of included documents characterised the 'Scottish approach' to partnership as rejecting the traditional donor-aid model and championing ideas of collaboration, reciprocity and equity in partnership. Yet simultaneously, most works described partnerships that positioned Scottish actors as the sources of expertise with partner country actors as beneficiaries, replicating the donor-recipient aid model. Additionally, the framing of partnership activities frequently deployed historical narrative frames.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2524069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'Scottish approach' to global health: A scoping review of the framing of global health partnerships.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Kim, Kaveri Qureshi, Emily Adrion, Goran Zangana, Sudeepa Abeysinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The narrative framings of partnerships and interventions in global health shed light on actors' conceptualisations of international development. Ideas of equity and justice in North-South partnerships are increasingly centred in international development and global health policy approaches. However, the extent to which these are evident within practice requires further investigation. This paper critically examines published work from health actors based in Scotland conducted within low - and middle-income countries (LMICs), under a Scottish government policy context currently promoted as engaging in a novel approach to international development. The paper uses a scoping review to analyse Scottish actors' engagement and framing of global health interventions and partnerships with LMIC actors. A majority of the texts discussed Scottish-affiliated global health partnerships and/or interventions in the Malawian medical education and clinical medicine context and focused on capacity building and knowledge transfer. Authors of included documents characterised the 'Scottish approach' to partnership as rejecting the traditional donor-aid model and championing ideas of collaboration, reciprocity and equity in partnership. Yet simultaneously, most works described partnerships that positioned Scottish actors as the sources of expertise with partner country actors as beneficiaries, replicating the donor-recipient aid model. Additionally, the framing of partnership activities frequently deployed historical narrative frames.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Public Health\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2524069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2524069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伙伴关系和全球卫生干预措施的叙述框架揭示了行为者对国际发展的概念。南北伙伴关系中的公平和正义理念日益集中于国际发展和全球卫生政策方针。然而,这些在实践中的明显程度需要进一步调查。本文严格审查了苏格兰卫生行为者在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)开展的已发表的工作,这些工作是在苏格兰政府政策背景下进行的,目前被宣传为从事国际发展的新方法。本文使用范围审查来分析苏格兰行动者的参与和全球卫生干预的框架以及与低收入和中等收入国家行动者的伙伴关系。大多数案文讨论了与苏格兰有关的全球卫生伙伴关系和/或马拉维医学教育和临床医学背景下的干预措施,并侧重于能力建设和知识转移。所收录文件的作者将“苏格兰方式”描述为拒绝传统的捐赠-援助模式,倡导合作、互惠和伙伴关系公平的理念。然而,与此同时,大多数作品描述了将苏格兰行动者定位为专业知识来源,将伙伴国行动者定位为受益者的伙伴关系,复制了捐助国-受援国援助模式。此外,伙伴关系活动的框架经常使用历史叙事框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The 'Scottish approach' to global health: A scoping review of the framing of global health partnerships.

The narrative framings of partnerships and interventions in global health shed light on actors' conceptualisations of international development. Ideas of equity and justice in North-South partnerships are increasingly centred in international development and global health policy approaches. However, the extent to which these are evident within practice requires further investigation. This paper critically examines published work from health actors based in Scotland conducted within low - and middle-income countries (LMICs), under a Scottish government policy context currently promoted as engaging in a novel approach to international development. The paper uses a scoping review to analyse Scottish actors' engagement and framing of global health interventions and partnerships with LMIC actors. A majority of the texts discussed Scottish-affiliated global health partnerships and/or interventions in the Malawian medical education and clinical medicine context and focused on capacity building and knowledge transfer. Authors of included documents characterised the 'Scottish approach' to partnership as rejecting the traditional donor-aid model and championing ideas of collaboration, reciprocity and equity in partnership. Yet simultaneously, most works described partnerships that positioned Scottish actors as the sources of expertise with partner country actors as beneficiaries, replicating the donor-recipient aid model. Additionally, the framing of partnership activities frequently deployed historical narrative frames.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信