Gitte Valentin, Pernille Pedersen, Thomas Maribo, Per Kallestrup, Nicolaj Meldgaard, Louise Stenholt, Mette B Larsen
{"title":"社会脆弱性指数主动识别在医疗保健中的风险个人:一个系统的审查。","authors":"Gitte Valentin, Pernille Pedersen, Thomas Maribo, Per Kallestrup, Nicolaj Meldgaard, Louise Stenholt, Mette B Larsen","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social vulnerability indices (SVIs) have the potential to guide risk stratification and support socially differentiated interventions to improve healthcare equity. However, their applicability in clinical settings remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from individual-level SVIs, focusing on (1) how social vulnerability is defined, (2) the domains and items covered, and (3) their ability to predict poor health outcomes. We searched the Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 31 January 2024 for studies linking individual-based SVIs with poor health outcomes in adult populations in Europe, North America, and Australasia. Data were extracted independently by two authors, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis addressed the review's aims, with thematic synthesis for the first two and a vote-counting approach for the third. Most SVIs included domains like income, social support, living situation, and educational attainment, with over 50% covering these factors. A consistent association was found between higher social vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. However, none of the identified SVIs were prospectively tested in clinical settings. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as low due to retrospective study designs and significant heterogeneity. This review highlights the potential of SVIs to predict poor health outcomes, though their lack of prospective validation limits current use. Future research should focus on adapting and testing SVIs that prioritize key socioeconomic and social support domains while adopting a simple and pragmatic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"844-854"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social vulnerability indices for proactively identifying at-risk individuals in healthcare: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Gitte Valentin, Pernille Pedersen, Thomas Maribo, Per Kallestrup, Nicolaj Meldgaard, Louise Stenholt, Mette B Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social vulnerability indices (SVIs) have the potential to guide risk stratification and support socially differentiated interventions to improve healthcare equity. However, their applicability in clinical settings remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from individual-level SVIs, focusing on (1) how social vulnerability is defined, (2) the domains and items covered, and (3) their ability to predict poor health outcomes. We searched the Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 31 January 2024 for studies linking individual-based SVIs with poor health outcomes in adult populations in Europe, North America, and Australasia. Data were extracted independently by two authors, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis addressed the review's aims, with thematic synthesis for the first two and a vote-counting approach for the third. Most SVIs included domains like income, social support, living situation, and educational attainment, with over 50% covering these factors. A consistent association was found between higher social vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. However, none of the identified SVIs were prospectively tested in clinical settings. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as low due to retrospective study designs and significant heterogeneity. This review highlights the potential of SVIs to predict poor health outcomes, though their lack of prospective validation limits current use. Future research should focus on adapting and testing SVIs that prioritize key socioeconomic and social support domains while adopting a simple and pragmatic approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"844-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
社会脆弱性指数(SVIs)具有指导风险分层和支持社会差异化干预以改善医疗公平的潜力。然而,它们在临床环境中的适用性仍然不确定。本系统综述综合了来自个体层面svi的证据,重点关注(1)如何定义社会脆弱性,(2)涵盖的领域和项目,以及(3)它们预测不良健康结果的能力。我们检索了Medline、PsycInfo、Embase和Web of Science数据库,从成立到2024年1月31日,在欧洲、北美和大洋洲的成年人中,将基于个体的svi与不良健康结果联系起来的研究。数据由两位作者独立提取,并使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。叙述综合解决了审查的目标,前两个是主题综合,第三个是计票方法。大多数svi包括收入、社会支持、生活状况和受教育程度等领域,覆盖这些因素的比例超过50%。较高的社会脆弱性与较差的健康结果之间存在一致的关联。然而,没有一个确定的svi在临床环境中进行前瞻性测试。由于回顾性研究设计和显著的异质性,证据的总体确定性被评估为低。本综述强调了svi预测不良健康结果的潜力,尽管其缺乏前瞻性验证限制了当前的使用。未来的研究应侧重于适应和测试svi,优先考虑关键的社会经济和社会支持领域,同时采用简单实用的方法。
Social vulnerability indices for proactively identifying at-risk individuals in healthcare: a systematic review.
Social vulnerability indices (SVIs) have the potential to guide risk stratification and support socially differentiated interventions to improve healthcare equity. However, their applicability in clinical settings remains uncertain. This systematic review synthesizes evidence from individual-level SVIs, focusing on (1) how social vulnerability is defined, (2) the domains and items covered, and (3) their ability to predict poor health outcomes. We searched the Medline, PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to 31 January 2024 for studies linking individual-based SVIs with poor health outcomes in adult populations in Europe, North America, and Australasia. Data were extracted independently by two authors, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. A narrative synthesis addressed the review's aims, with thematic synthesis for the first two and a vote-counting approach for the third. Most SVIs included domains like income, social support, living situation, and educational attainment, with over 50% covering these factors. A consistent association was found between higher social vulnerability and poorer health outcomes. However, none of the identified SVIs were prospectively tested in clinical settings. The overall certainty of evidence was assessed as low due to retrospective study designs and significant heterogeneity. This review highlights the potential of SVIs to predict poor health outcomes, though their lack of prospective validation limits current use. Future research should focus on adapting and testing SVIs that prioritize key socioeconomic and social support domains while adopting a simple and pragmatic approach.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.