接受美沙酮维持治疗的患者普瑞巴林和美沙酮血浆水平:一项观察性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s40261-025-01460-9
Anat Sason, Miriam Adelson, Shaul Schreiber, Einat Peles
{"title":"接受美沙酮维持治疗的患者普瑞巴林和美沙酮血浆水平:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Anat Sason, Miriam Adelson, Shaul Schreiber, Einat Peles","doi":"10.1007/s40261-025-01460-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The combination of pregabalin and opioid usage is a known risk for fatalities. The pregabalin misuse rate among patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is reported to be high. However, pregabalin's risk among MMT patients, specifically concerning methadone dose and plasma level, is not yet determined. We aimed to study retention, survival, and whether pregabalin misuse is related to methadone dose and plasma level in MMT patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted on 273 patients at the MMT clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel. Inclusion criteria required having urine drug-screening results for pregabalin when evaluated for methadone plasma levels. Methadone dose and plasma level, drug in urine, sociodemographic, and addiction variables were taken from patients' records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive urine for pregabalin (n = 50) were comparable to 223 negative patients tested in methadone dose (124.3 ± 30.7 vs. 117.1 ± 42.5, p = 0.3) but had higher methadone plasma levels (693.8 ± 327.6 vs. 572.3 ± 286.5 ng/ml, p = 0.009) and QTc intervals on ECG (422.8 ± 31.8 vs. 412.1 ± 29.8 ms, p = 0.03). Logistic regression model found pregabalin tested positive as more likely to test positive for benzodiazepine (OR = 9.1), methylphenidate (OR = 5.5), and fentanyl (OR = 5.9), and to have higher methadone plasma levels (OR = 1.002). Cumulative retention (p < 0.001) and survival (p = 0.007) since admission to MMT were both shorter in the pregabalin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who tested positive for pregabalin presented high methadone plasma levels, even though they were treated with normal or low methadone doses. This phenomenon highlights the importance of monitoring methadone levels, which is not a routine procedure, to reduce patients' risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"575-582"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregabalin and Methadone Plasma Levels in Patients Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anat Sason, Miriam Adelson, Shaul Schreiber, Einat Peles\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40261-025-01460-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The combination of pregabalin and opioid usage is a known risk for fatalities. The pregabalin misuse rate among patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is reported to be high. However, pregabalin's risk among MMT patients, specifically concerning methadone dose and plasma level, is not yet determined. We aimed to study retention, survival, and whether pregabalin misuse is related to methadone dose and plasma level in MMT patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted on 273 patients at the MMT clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel. Inclusion criteria required having urine drug-screening results for pregabalin when evaluated for methadone plasma levels. Methadone dose and plasma level, drug in urine, sociodemographic, and addiction variables were taken from patients' records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with positive urine for pregabalin (n = 50) were comparable to 223 negative patients tested in methadone dose (124.3 ± 30.7 vs. 117.1 ± 42.5, p = 0.3) but had higher methadone plasma levels (693.8 ± 327.6 vs. 572.3 ± 286.5 ng/ml, p = 0.009) and QTc intervals on ECG (422.8 ± 31.8 vs. 412.1 ± 29.8 ms, p = 0.03). Logistic regression model found pregabalin tested positive as more likely to test positive for benzodiazepine (OR = 9.1), methylphenidate (OR = 5.5), and fentanyl (OR = 5.9), and to have higher methadone plasma levels (OR = 1.002). Cumulative retention (p < 0.001) and survival (p = 0.007) since admission to MMT were both shorter in the pregabalin group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who tested positive for pregabalin presented high methadone plasma levels, even though they were treated with normal or low methadone doses. This phenomenon highlights the importance of monitoring methadone levels, which is not a routine procedure, to reduce patients' risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"575-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01460-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-025-01460-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:普瑞巴林和阿片类药物的联合使用是已知的死亡风险。据报道,美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)患者普瑞巴林误用率很高。然而,普瑞巴林在MMT患者中的风险,特别是美沙酮剂量和血浆水平,尚未确定。我们的目的是研究MMT患者的滞留、生存,以及普瑞巴林滥用是否与美沙酮剂量和血浆水平有关。方法:对以色列特拉维夫MMT诊所的273例患者进行观察性研究。纳入标准要求在评估美沙酮血浆水平时,有普瑞巴林尿液药物筛选结果。美沙酮剂量和血浆水平、尿中药物、社会人口统计学和成瘾变量均取自患者记录。结果:尿普瑞gabalin阳性患者(n = 50)与223例阴性患者美沙酮剂量相当(124.3±30.7比117.1±42.5,p = 0.3),但美沙酮血浆水平(693.8±327.6比572.3±286.5 ng/ml, p = 0.009)和心电图QTc间隔(422.8±31.8比412.1±29.8 ms, p = 0.03)高于阴性患者。Logistic回归模型发现普瑞巴林更可能检测出苯二氮卓(OR = 9.1)、哌甲酯(OR = 5.5)和芬太尼(OR = 5.9)阳性,并且美沙酮血浆水平更高(OR = 1.002)。结论:普瑞巴林检测阳性的患者,即使接受正常或低剂量的美沙酮治疗,其血浆美沙酮水平也较高。这种现象强调了监测美沙酮水平的重要性,这不是常规程序,以减少患者的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregabalin and Methadone Plasma Levels in Patients Receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment: An Observational Study.

Background and objectives: The combination of pregabalin and opioid usage is a known risk for fatalities. The pregabalin misuse rate among patients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is reported to be high. However, pregabalin's risk among MMT patients, specifically concerning methadone dose and plasma level, is not yet determined. We aimed to study retention, survival, and whether pregabalin misuse is related to methadone dose and plasma level in MMT patients.

Methods: An observational study was conducted on 273 patients at the MMT clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel. Inclusion criteria required having urine drug-screening results for pregabalin when evaluated for methadone plasma levels. Methadone dose and plasma level, drug in urine, sociodemographic, and addiction variables were taken from patients' records.

Results: Patients with positive urine for pregabalin (n = 50) were comparable to 223 negative patients tested in methadone dose (124.3 ± 30.7 vs. 117.1 ± 42.5, p = 0.3) but had higher methadone plasma levels (693.8 ± 327.6 vs. 572.3 ± 286.5 ng/ml, p = 0.009) and QTc intervals on ECG (422.8 ± 31.8 vs. 412.1 ± 29.8 ms, p = 0.03). Logistic regression model found pregabalin tested positive as more likely to test positive for benzodiazepine (OR = 9.1), methylphenidate (OR = 5.5), and fentanyl (OR = 5.9), and to have higher methadone plasma levels (OR = 1.002). Cumulative retention (p < 0.001) and survival (p = 0.007) since admission to MMT were both shorter in the pregabalin group.

Conclusions: Patients who tested positive for pregabalin presented high methadone plasma levels, even though they were treated with normal or low methadone doses. This phenomenon highlights the importance of monitoring methadone levels, which is not a routine procedure, to reduce patients' risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信