锁骨移位损伤后患者共同决策的经验:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1177/02692155251355440
Natasha Maher, Maria Clare Moffatt, Felicity Astin, Chris Littlewood
{"title":"锁骨移位损伤后患者共同决策的经验:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Natasha Maher, Maria Clare Moffatt, Felicity Astin, Chris Littlewood","doi":"10.1177/02692155251355440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the patient experience of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury, focusing on how patients understand their injury and how this influences decisions.DesignDescriptive qualitative study design using individual semi-structured interviews.SettingParticipants recruited from three United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals.ParticipantsPatients with a displaced collarbone injury were interviewed about their experiences of shared decision-making.Main measuresInterviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree themes emerged: (1) Understanding of the injury, (2) Factors influencing treatment decision and (3) Experience of shared decision-making. Patients' interpretation of their injury, including the language used by clinicians, shaped their understanding and decisions. Factors such as previous injuries, employment, clinician advice and expectations also influenced treatment choices. Some patients described uncertainty during decision-making conversations and felt unsupported in choosing the option that best suited them. Others felt steered towards specific treatments without fully grasping their implications.ConclusionThis is the first qualitative interview study exploring patients' perspectives of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury. While patients considered several factors when deciding between treatment options, many described limited involvement in decision-making and felt directed towards clinician-preferred treatments without fully understanding the implications. This highlights inconsistency in the implementation of shared decision-making in practice. Despite the United Kingdom National Health Service emphasis on shared decision-making, further efforts are needed to ensure that patients are actively supported in making informed, preference-sensitive decisions, in line with the goals of personalised care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1105-1115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient experiences of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury: A qualitative interview study.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Maher, Maria Clare Moffatt, Felicity Astin, Chris Littlewood\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251355440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the patient experience of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury, focusing on how patients understand their injury and how this influences decisions.DesignDescriptive qualitative study design using individual semi-structured interviews.SettingParticipants recruited from three United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals.ParticipantsPatients with a displaced collarbone injury were interviewed about their experiences of shared decision-making.Main measuresInterviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree themes emerged: (1) Understanding of the injury, (2) Factors influencing treatment decision and (3) Experience of shared decision-making. Patients' interpretation of their injury, including the language used by clinicians, shaped their understanding and decisions. Factors such as previous injuries, employment, clinician advice and expectations also influenced treatment choices. Some patients described uncertainty during decision-making conversations and felt unsupported in choosing the option that best suited them. Others felt steered towards specific treatments without fully grasping their implications.ConclusionThis is the first qualitative interview study exploring patients' perspectives of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury. While patients considered several factors when deciding between treatment options, many described limited involvement in decision-making and felt directed towards clinician-preferred treatments without fully understanding the implications. This highlights inconsistency in the implementation of shared decision-making in practice. Despite the United Kingdom National Health Service emphasis on shared decision-making, further efforts are needed to ensure that patients are actively supported in making informed, preference-sensitive decisions, in line with the goals of personalised care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1105-1115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251355440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251355440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨锁骨移位损伤后患者共同决策的经验,重点关注患者如何理解他们的损伤及其对决策的影响。设计采用个人半结构化访谈的描述性定性研究设计。参与者从三家英国国家卫生服务医院招募。对锁骨移位损伤患者进行访谈,了解他们共同决策的经历。主要措施访谈录音,逐字转录,并使用归纳专题分析分析。结果出现了三个主题:(1)对损伤的认识;(2)影响治疗决策的因素;(3)共同决策的经验。患者对其损伤的解释,包括临床医生使用的语言,影响了他们的理解和决定。以前的伤害、就业、临床医生的建议和期望等因素也会影响治疗选择。一些患者在决策对话中描述了不确定性,在选择最适合他们的选择时感到没有得到支持。其他人则感觉被引导到特定的治疗方法,而没有完全理解其含义。结论:这是第一个探讨锁骨移位损伤后患者共同决策观点的定性访谈研究。虽然患者在决定治疗方案时考虑了几个因素,但许多人描述了他们在决策过程中的有限参与,并且在没有充分理解其含义的情况下,直接选择了医生首选的治疗方法。这凸显了实践中共同决策执行的不一致性。尽管联合王国国民保健服务强调共同决策,但仍需进一步努力,确保患者在作出知情的、对偏好敏感的决定时得到积极支持,以符合个性化护理的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient experiences of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury: A qualitative interview study.

ObjectiveTo explore the patient experience of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury, focusing on how patients understand their injury and how this influences decisions.DesignDescriptive qualitative study design using individual semi-structured interviews.SettingParticipants recruited from three United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals.ParticipantsPatients with a displaced collarbone injury were interviewed about their experiences of shared decision-making.Main measuresInterviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree themes emerged: (1) Understanding of the injury, (2) Factors influencing treatment decision and (3) Experience of shared decision-making. Patients' interpretation of their injury, including the language used by clinicians, shaped their understanding and decisions. Factors such as previous injuries, employment, clinician advice and expectations also influenced treatment choices. Some patients described uncertainty during decision-making conversations and felt unsupported in choosing the option that best suited them. Others felt steered towards specific treatments without fully grasping their implications.ConclusionThis is the first qualitative interview study exploring patients' perspectives of shared decision-making following a displaced collarbone injury. While patients considered several factors when deciding between treatment options, many described limited involvement in decision-making and felt directed towards clinician-preferred treatments without fully understanding the implications. This highlights inconsistency in the implementation of shared decision-making in practice. Despite the United Kingdom National Health Service emphasis on shared decision-making, further efforts are needed to ensure that patients are actively supported in making informed, preference-sensitive decisions, in line with the goals of personalised care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信