Jinghua Yang, Cong Zhao, Lan Yang, Yonggang Yang, Nina Wang, Ang Gao, Xian Wang
{"title":"伊伐布雷定在美国FDA不良事件报告系统中的不相称性分析:一项在总体和特定适应症人群中的真实世界研究。","authors":"Jinghua Yang, Cong Zhao, Lan Yang, Yonggang Yang, Nina Wang, Ang Gao, Xian Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40256-025-00734-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ivabradine, a selective I<sub>f</sub> current inhibitor, is widely prescribed for heart failure and chronic angina; however, its post-marketing safety profile across diverse clinical contexts remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzed ivabradine-associated adverse events (AEs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, with a focus on overall patterns and indication-specific subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from quarter 2, 2015, to quarter 2, 2024, and conducted a disproportionality analysis using four methods: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. We stratified AEs by clinical indications (tachycardia, heart failure, coronary artery disease) and prioritized them using a semi-quantitative scoring system and important or designated medical event criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2733 ivabradine-related AE reports were identified, involving 24 system organ classes. Cardiac disorders (n = 1045) and eye disorders (n = 352) were most frequent, with bradycardia, arrhythmias, and photopsia being the leading events. Subgroup analyses revealed distinct AE profiles: sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia in the tachycardia subgroup; blurred vision and angina in coronary artery disease; and severe AEs-such as dyspnea, prolonged QT interval, and ventricular fibrillation-primarily in heart failure. One rare but notable designated medical event, transient blindness (n = 3), was also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ivabradine shows an overall favorable safety profile. Most AEs appear related to underlying disease or comedications rather than intrinsic drug toxicity. These findings support indication-specific monitoring to enhance clinical safety and pharmacovigilance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproportionality Analysis of Ivabradine in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: A Real-World Study Across Overall and Indication-Specific Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Jinghua Yang, Cong Zhao, Lan Yang, Yonggang Yang, Nina Wang, Ang Gao, Xian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40256-025-00734-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ivabradine, a selective I<sub>f</sub> current inhibitor, is widely prescribed for heart failure and chronic angina; however, its post-marketing safety profile across diverse clinical contexts remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzed ivabradine-associated adverse events (AEs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, with a focus on overall patterns and indication-specific subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from quarter 2, 2015, to quarter 2, 2024, and conducted a disproportionality analysis using four methods: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. We stratified AEs by clinical indications (tachycardia, heart failure, coronary artery disease) and prioritized them using a semi-quantitative scoring system and important or designated medical event criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2733 ivabradine-related AE reports were identified, involving 24 system organ classes. Cardiac disorders (n = 1045) and eye disorders (n = 352) were most frequent, with bradycardia, arrhythmias, and photopsia being the leading events. Subgroup analyses revealed distinct AE profiles: sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia in the tachycardia subgroup; blurred vision and angina in coronary artery disease; and severe AEs-such as dyspnea, prolonged QT interval, and ventricular fibrillation-primarily in heart failure. One rare but notable designated medical event, transient blindness (n = 3), was also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ivabradine shows an overall favorable safety profile. Most AEs appear related to underlying disease or comedications rather than intrinsic drug toxicity. These findings support indication-specific monitoring to enhance clinical safety and pharmacovigilance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00734-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-025-00734-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disproportionality Analysis of Ivabradine in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: A Real-World Study Across Overall and Indication-Specific Populations.
Background: Ivabradine, a selective If current inhibitor, is widely prescribed for heart failure and chronic angina; however, its post-marketing safety profile across diverse clinical contexts remains underexplored.
Objective: This study analyzed ivabradine-associated adverse events (AEs) using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, with a focus on overall patterns and indication-specific subgroups.
Methods: We reviewed reports from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from quarter 2, 2015, to quarter 2, 2024, and conducted a disproportionality analysis using four methods: reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean. We stratified AEs by clinical indications (tachycardia, heart failure, coronary artery disease) and prioritized them using a semi-quantitative scoring system and important or designated medical event criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency.
Results: A total of 2733 ivabradine-related AE reports were identified, involving 24 system organ classes. Cardiac disorders (n = 1045) and eye disorders (n = 352) were most frequent, with bradycardia, arrhythmias, and photopsia being the leading events. Subgroup analyses revealed distinct AE profiles: sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia in the tachycardia subgroup; blurred vision and angina in coronary artery disease; and severe AEs-such as dyspnea, prolonged QT interval, and ventricular fibrillation-primarily in heart failure. One rare but notable designated medical event, transient blindness (n = 3), was also identified.
Conclusion: Ivabradine shows an overall favorable safety profile. Most AEs appear related to underlying disease or comedications rather than intrinsic drug toxicity. These findings support indication-specific monitoring to enhance clinical safety and pharmacovigilance.
期刊介绍:
Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents.
Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations.
The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.