与抗gfap抗体相关的自身免疫性星形细胞病中Kappa和Lambda自由光链的相关性

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael Levraut, Romain Marignier, Mikael Cohen, Jeanne Benoit, Cassandre Landes-Chateau, Elisabeth Maillart, Marion Cremoni, Barbara Seitz-Polski, Anne-Laurie Pinto, Pauline Dumez, Jérôme Honnorat, Christine Lebrun-Frenay
{"title":"与抗gfap抗体相关的自身免疫性星形细胞病中Kappa和Lambda自由光链的相关性","authors":"Michael Levraut,&nbsp;Romain Marignier,&nbsp;Mikael Cohen,&nbsp;Jeanne Benoit,&nbsp;Cassandre Landes-Chateau,&nbsp;Elisabeth Maillart,&nbsp;Marion Cremoni,&nbsp;Barbara Seitz-Polski,&nbsp;Anne-Laurie Pinto,&nbsp;Pauline Dumez,&nbsp;Jérôme Honnorat,&nbsp;Christine Lebrun-Frenay","doi":"10.1002/acn3.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The kappa-free light chain (κ-FLC) index is known to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), while little is understood about lambda (λ)-FLC. This study assessed the κ-FLC and λ-FLC indices in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This multicenter study compares κ-FLC and λ-FLC indexes among patients with autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and sex- and age-matched MS (positive control group) as well as symptomatic controls (headaches and small cerebral vessel disease, as the negative control group). We describe the correlation of both indexes with clinical variables and outcomes in the GFAP astrocytopathy cohort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 93 patients were included (31 in each group). The median κ-FLC index was higher in the MS group (65.5 [35.7; 118.3]) compared to the GFAP astrocytopathy group (26.1 [11.4; 78.4], <i>p</i> = 0.062). With a κ-FLC index threshold of 6.1, the proportion of patients with a positive κ-FLC index was similar between the MS (94%) and GFAP-astrocytopathy groups (84%, <i>p</i> = 0.425). The median λ-FLC index was higher in the GFAP astrocytopathy group (45.5 [28.4; 96.9]) than in the MS group (10.6 [2.2; 29.1], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n \n <p>In the GFAP-astrocytopathy group, both CSF λ-FLC and the λ-FLC index at baseline were correlated with the last follow-up mRS (<i>⍴</i> = 0.46, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.088, <i>p</i> = 0.014, and <i>⍴</i> = 0.32, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.101, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The κ-FLC index alone cannot distinguish between autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and MS. We indicate a potential diagnostic and prognostic role of the λ-FLC index in GFAP astrocytopathy that needs confirmation in independent cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 9","pages":"1785-1793"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relevance of Kappa and Lambda Free Light Chains in Autoimmune Astrocytopathy Associated With Anti-GFAP Antibodies\",\"authors\":\"Michael Levraut,&nbsp;Romain Marignier,&nbsp;Mikael Cohen,&nbsp;Jeanne Benoit,&nbsp;Cassandre Landes-Chateau,&nbsp;Elisabeth Maillart,&nbsp;Marion Cremoni,&nbsp;Barbara Seitz-Polski,&nbsp;Anne-Laurie Pinto,&nbsp;Pauline Dumez,&nbsp;Jérôme Honnorat,&nbsp;Christine Lebrun-Frenay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.70103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The kappa-free light chain (κ-FLC) index is known to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), while little is understood about lambda (λ)-FLC. This study assessed the κ-FLC and λ-FLC indices in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This multicenter study compares κ-FLC and λ-FLC indexes among patients with autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and sex- and age-matched MS (positive control group) as well as symptomatic controls (headaches and small cerebral vessel disease, as the negative control group). We describe the correlation of both indexes with clinical variables and outcomes in the GFAP astrocytopathy cohort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 93 patients were included (31 in each group). The median κ-FLC index was higher in the MS group (65.5 [35.7; 118.3]) compared to the GFAP astrocytopathy group (26.1 [11.4; 78.4], <i>p</i> = 0.062). With a κ-FLC index threshold of 6.1, the proportion of patients with a positive κ-FLC index was similar between the MS (94%) and GFAP-astrocytopathy groups (84%, <i>p</i> = 0.425). The median λ-FLC index was higher in the GFAP astrocytopathy group (45.5 [28.4; 96.9]) than in the MS group (10.6 [2.2; 29.1], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n \\n <p>In the GFAP-astrocytopathy group, both CSF λ-FLC and the λ-FLC index at baseline were correlated with the last follow-up mRS (<i>⍴</i> = 0.46, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.088, <i>p</i> = 0.014, and <i>⍴</i> = 0.32, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.101, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The κ-FLC index alone cannot distinguish between autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and MS. We indicate a potential diagnostic and prognostic role of the λ-FLC index in GFAP astrocytopathy that needs confirmation in independent cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"1785-1793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.70103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.70103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.70103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:kappa-free light chain (κ-FLC)指数对于多发性硬化症(MS)的诊断具有很高的敏感性和特异性,而lambda (λ)-FLC的诊断却知之甚少。本研究评估自身免疫胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)星形细胞病中κ-FLC和λ-FLC指数的变化。方法:本多中心研究比较自身免疫性GFAP星形细胞病和性别、年龄匹配的MS患者(阳性对照组)和症状对照组(头痛、小脑血管病为阴性对照组)的κ-FLC和λ-FLC指标。我们描述了GFAP星形细胞病变队列中这两个指标与临床变量和结果的相关性。结果:共纳入93例患者,每组31例。MS组中位κ-FLC指数较高(65.5 [35.7;118.3])与GFAP星形细胞病变组相比(26.1 [11.4;[78.4], p = 0.062)。在κ-FLC指数阈值为6.1的情况下,MS组和gmap -星形细胞病变组中κ-FLC指数阳性的患者比例相近(94%),两者差异无统计学意义(84%,p = 0.425)。GFAP星形细胞病变组中位λ-FLC指数较高(45.5 [28.4;96.9])高于MS组(10.6 [2.2;29.1], p 2 = 0.088, p = 0.014,⍴= 0.32,r2 = 0.12, p = 0.101)。结论:单靠κ-FLC指数不能区分自身免疫性GFAP星形细胞病和ms。我们提示,λ-FLC指数在GFAP星形细胞病中具有潜在的诊断和预后作用,这需要在独立的队列中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relevance of Kappa and Lambda Free Light Chains in Autoimmune Astrocytopathy Associated With Anti-GFAP Antibodies

Relevance of Kappa and Lambda Free Light Chains in Autoimmune Astrocytopathy Associated With Anti-GFAP Antibodies

Relevance of Kappa and Lambda Free Light Chains in Autoimmune Astrocytopathy Associated With Anti-GFAP Antibodies

Introduction

The kappa-free light chain (κ-FLC) index is known to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS), while little is understood about lambda (λ)-FLC. This study assessed the κ-FLC and λ-FLC indices in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy.

Methods

This multicenter study compares κ-FLC and λ-FLC indexes among patients with autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and sex- and age-matched MS (positive control group) as well as symptomatic controls (headaches and small cerebral vessel disease, as the negative control group). We describe the correlation of both indexes with clinical variables and outcomes in the GFAP astrocytopathy cohort.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included (31 in each group). The median κ-FLC index was higher in the MS group (65.5 [35.7; 118.3]) compared to the GFAP astrocytopathy group (26.1 [11.4; 78.4], p = 0.062). With a κ-FLC index threshold of 6.1, the proportion of patients with a positive κ-FLC index was similar between the MS (94%) and GFAP-astrocytopathy groups (84%, p = 0.425). The median λ-FLC index was higher in the GFAP astrocytopathy group (45.5 [28.4; 96.9]) than in the MS group (10.6 [2.2; 29.1], p < 0.001).

In the GFAP-astrocytopathy group, both CSF λ-FLC and the λ-FLC index at baseline were correlated with the last follow-up mRS ( = 0.46, r2 = 0.088, p = 0.014, and  = 0.32, r2 = 0.12, p = 0.101, respectively).

Conclusion

The κ-FLC index alone cannot distinguish between autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy and MS. We indicate a potential diagnostic and prognostic role of the λ-FLC index in GFAP astrocytopathy that needs confirmation in independent cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信