英格兰和苏格兰五个地区初级保健社会处方链接工作者(SPLW)计划的交付模式和数据记录的映射变化

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eddie Donaghy, Hillary Collins, Morgan Beeson, Heather Brant, Manal Etemadi, Catherine Perry, Stewart W. Mercer, Hugh McLeod, Kate O’Donnell, Caroline Sanders, Paul Wilson
{"title":"英格兰和苏格兰五个地区初级保健社会处方链接工作者(SPLW)计划的交付模式和数据记录的映射变化","authors":"Eddie Donaghy,&nbsp;Hillary Collins,&nbsp;Morgan Beeson,&nbsp;Heather Brant,&nbsp;Manal Etemadi,&nbsp;Catherine Perry,&nbsp;Stewart W. Mercer,&nbsp;Hugh McLeod,&nbsp;Kate O’Donnell,&nbsp;Caroline Sanders,&nbsp;Paul Wilson","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9243925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) connect people to community resources for better health and well-being. Over the past decade, SPLW schemes have expanded rapidly in NHS primary care in England and Scotland. However, how these schemes have been implemented and assessed in different parts of England and Scotland is not well understood. A mapping exercise of SPLW schemes in three English and two Scottish regions was undertaken to identify services and describe their key features, as well as any variations in delivery, what data are recorded, and how outcomes are measured. Consultations were held with SPLW stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 98) supplemented with online analysis. Using the TIDieR framework, a taxonomy of SPLW services was created. Across the five regions, four different SPLW employment models were identified, varying by employer and SPLW management approaches. Some regions used up to three models, others only one. Local variations in delivering SPLW schemes included different referral routes, age ranges, priority groups, types of SPLW schemes available, and number of sessions offered. A variety of methods were used to assess service user outcomes, including validated well-being tools, bespoke well-being tools, bespoke service user surveys, and qualitative case studies. Variation existed in data recording systems used and, in the frequency, and consistency in using assessment tools and recording service user outcomes. Variation in SPLW delivery models indicates regional and localized interpretations of SPLW schemes. Variations in recording and measuring service user outcomes and in well-being tools used present challenges for effective evaluation/s of each model and primary care SPLW schemes overall. Enhancing local and national data systems, along with supporting strategies and frameworks for evaluations, would boost SPLW infrastructure and support future policy developments.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9243925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping Variation in Delivery Models and Data Recording of Primary Care Social Prescribing Link Worker (SPLW) Schemes Across Five Regions in England and Scotland\",\"authors\":\"Eddie Donaghy,&nbsp;Hillary Collins,&nbsp;Morgan Beeson,&nbsp;Heather Brant,&nbsp;Manal Etemadi,&nbsp;Catherine Perry,&nbsp;Stewart W. Mercer,&nbsp;Hugh McLeod,&nbsp;Kate O’Donnell,&nbsp;Caroline Sanders,&nbsp;Paul Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/9243925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) connect people to community resources for better health and well-being. Over the past decade, SPLW schemes have expanded rapidly in NHS primary care in England and Scotland. However, how these schemes have been implemented and assessed in different parts of England and Scotland is not well understood. A mapping exercise of SPLW schemes in three English and two Scottish regions was undertaken to identify services and describe their key features, as well as any variations in delivery, what data are recorded, and how outcomes are measured. Consultations were held with SPLW stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 98) supplemented with online analysis. Using the TIDieR framework, a taxonomy of SPLW services was created. Across the five regions, four different SPLW employment models were identified, varying by employer and SPLW management approaches. Some regions used up to three models, others only one. Local variations in delivering SPLW schemes included different referral routes, age ranges, priority groups, types of SPLW schemes available, and number of sessions offered. A variety of methods were used to assess service user outcomes, including validated well-being tools, bespoke well-being tools, bespoke service user surveys, and qualitative case studies. Variation existed in data recording systems used and, in the frequency, and consistency in using assessment tools and recording service user outcomes. Variation in SPLW delivery models indicates regional and localized interpretations of SPLW schemes. Variations in recording and measuring service user outcomes and in well-being tools used present challenges for effective evaluation/s of each model and primary care SPLW schemes overall. Enhancing local and national data systems, along with supporting strategies and frameworks for evaluations, would boost SPLW infrastructure and support future policy developments.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9243925\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9243925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9243925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会处方链接工作者(splw)将人们与社区资源联系起来,以改善健康和福祉。在过去的十年中,SPLW计划在英格兰和苏格兰的NHS初级保健中迅速扩大。然而,这些计划是如何在英格兰和苏格兰的不同地区实施和评估的,目前还不太清楚。在三个英格兰地区和两个苏格兰地区开展了一项SPLW计划的测绘工作,以确定服务并描述其主要特征,以及交付中的任何变化、记录的数据以及如何衡量结果。与SPLW利益相关者(n = 98)进行了磋商,并辅以在线分析。使用TIDieR框架,创建了SPLW服务的分类法。在五个地区,确定了四种不同的SPLW就业模式,因雇主和SPLW管理方法而异。一些地区使用了多达三种模型,而其他地区只有一种。提供公共福利计划的地方差异包括不同的推荐路线、年龄范围、优先组、可用的公共福利计划类型和提供的会议次数。我们使用了多种方法来评估服务用户的结果,包括经过验证的幸福感工具、定制的幸福感工具、定制的服务用户调查和定性案例研究。所使用的数据记录系统存在差异,使用评估工具和记录服务用户结果的频率和一致性也存在差异。SPLW交付模式的差异表明了SPLW方案的区域和局部解释。记录和衡量服务使用者结果的差异以及所使用的福祉工具的差异,为有效评估每种模式和总体初级保健社会福利福利计划带来了挑战。加强地方和国家数据系统,以及支持评价的战略和框架,将促进SPLW基础设施和支持未来的政策发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping Variation in Delivery Models and Data Recording of Primary Care Social Prescribing Link Worker (SPLW) Schemes Across Five Regions in England and Scotland

Mapping Variation in Delivery Models and Data Recording of Primary Care Social Prescribing Link Worker (SPLW) Schemes Across Five Regions in England and Scotland

Social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) connect people to community resources for better health and well-being. Over the past decade, SPLW schemes have expanded rapidly in NHS primary care in England and Scotland. However, how these schemes have been implemented and assessed in different parts of England and Scotland is not well understood. A mapping exercise of SPLW schemes in three English and two Scottish regions was undertaken to identify services and describe their key features, as well as any variations in delivery, what data are recorded, and how outcomes are measured. Consultations were held with SPLW stakeholders (n = 98) supplemented with online analysis. Using the TIDieR framework, a taxonomy of SPLW services was created. Across the five regions, four different SPLW employment models were identified, varying by employer and SPLW management approaches. Some regions used up to three models, others only one. Local variations in delivering SPLW schemes included different referral routes, age ranges, priority groups, types of SPLW schemes available, and number of sessions offered. A variety of methods were used to assess service user outcomes, including validated well-being tools, bespoke well-being tools, bespoke service user surveys, and qualitative case studies. Variation existed in data recording systems used and, in the frequency, and consistency in using assessment tools and recording service user outcomes. Variation in SPLW delivery models indicates regional and localized interpretations of SPLW schemes. Variations in recording and measuring service user outcomes and in well-being tools used present challenges for effective evaluation/s of each model and primary care SPLW schemes overall. Enhancing local and national data systems, along with supporting strategies and frameworks for evaluations, would boost SPLW infrastructure and support future policy developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信