盐对亲水亲脂偏差(HLD)方程的影响

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Marlee Leonard, Zahra Abbasian Chaleshtari, Steven T. Adamy, Robert T. Zehr, Dave Sabatini, Jeffrey H. Harwell, Brian P. Grady
{"title":"盐对亲水亲脂偏差(HLD)方程的影响","authors":"Marlee Leonard,&nbsp;Zahra Abbasian Chaleshtari,&nbsp;Steven T. Adamy,&nbsp;Robert T. Zehr,&nbsp;Dave Sabatini,&nbsp;Jeffrey H. Harwell,&nbsp;Brian P. Grady","doi":"10.1002/jsde.12843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The hydrophilic–lipophilic difference (HLD) equation is being used extensively for designing oil-in-water based surfactant systems to maximize oil solubility and minimize oil–water interfacial tension. However, the equation was developed for and almost always presumes that the salt is sodium chloride. The work described in this paper extends the equation to other monovalent cations (Li, K) and divalent anions (CO<sub>3</sub>). The equation was adjusted for molecular weight and the number of cations in the salt. For anionic surfactants, the Hofmeister series successfully qualitatively predicts that the salt concentration to reach HLD = 0 scales with Li &gt; Na &gt; K, that is, the surfactant with lithium requires more salt for the water to reach the hydrophobicity required. Although the exact salt concentration depends on the anionic surfactant headgroup, the difference in optimal salinity between two cations appears to not be dependent on headgroup. Also, CO<sub>3</sub> reduces the activity of the cation as compared to Cl. For narrow-range alcohol ethoxylates, there is little difference between Na and K; while Li requires more salt for a given increase in hydrocarbon number of carbons to reach HLD = 0. A broad-range ethoxylate gives inconsistent results, which we attribute to the finite solubility of some surfactant components in the oil.</p>","PeriodicalId":17083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surfactants and Detergents","volume":"28 4","pages":"813-822"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salt effects on the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) equation\",\"authors\":\"Marlee Leonard,&nbsp;Zahra Abbasian Chaleshtari,&nbsp;Steven T. Adamy,&nbsp;Robert T. Zehr,&nbsp;Dave Sabatini,&nbsp;Jeffrey H. Harwell,&nbsp;Brian P. Grady\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsde.12843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The hydrophilic–lipophilic difference (HLD) equation is being used extensively for designing oil-in-water based surfactant systems to maximize oil solubility and minimize oil–water interfacial tension. However, the equation was developed for and almost always presumes that the salt is sodium chloride. The work described in this paper extends the equation to other monovalent cations (Li, K) and divalent anions (CO<sub>3</sub>). The equation was adjusted for molecular weight and the number of cations in the salt. For anionic surfactants, the Hofmeister series successfully qualitatively predicts that the salt concentration to reach HLD = 0 scales with Li &gt; Na &gt; K, that is, the surfactant with lithium requires more salt for the water to reach the hydrophobicity required. Although the exact salt concentration depends on the anionic surfactant headgroup, the difference in optimal salinity between two cations appears to not be dependent on headgroup. Also, CO<sub>3</sub> reduces the activity of the cation as compared to Cl. For narrow-range alcohol ethoxylates, there is little difference between Na and K; while Li requires more salt for a given increase in hydrocarbon number of carbons to reach HLD = 0. A broad-range ethoxylate gives inconsistent results, which we attribute to the finite solubility of some surfactant components in the oil.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surfactants and Detergents\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"813-822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surfactants and Detergents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsde.12843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surfactants and Detergents","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsde.12843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亲水-亲脂差异(HLD)方程被广泛用于设计油基表面活性剂体系,以最大化油的溶解度和最小化油水界面张力。然而,这个方程是为并且几乎总是假定盐是氯化钠而建立的。本文所描述的工作将该方程扩展到其他一价阳离子(Li, K)和二价阴离子(CO3)。根据盐的分子量和阳离子的数量对方程进行了调整。对于阴离子表面活性剂,Hofmeister系列成功地定性预测了Li >; Na >; K的盐浓度达到HLD = 0的尺度,即含锂表面活性剂需要更多的盐才能使水达到所需的疏水性。虽然确切的盐浓度取决于阴离子表面活性剂的头基,但两种阳离子之间的最佳盐度差异似乎并不取决于头基。此外,与Cl相比,CO3降低了阳离子的活性。对于窄范围的醇乙氧基醚,Na和K之间的差异不大;而锂则需要更多的盐,以使碳氢化合物的碳数增加到HLD = 0。宽范围的乙氧基酸盐给出了不一致的结果,我们将其归因于一些表面活性剂组分在油中的有限溶解度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salt effects on the hydrophilic-lipophilic deviation (HLD) equation

The hydrophilic–lipophilic difference (HLD) equation is being used extensively for designing oil-in-water based surfactant systems to maximize oil solubility and minimize oil–water interfacial tension. However, the equation was developed for and almost always presumes that the salt is sodium chloride. The work described in this paper extends the equation to other monovalent cations (Li, K) and divalent anions (CO3). The equation was adjusted for molecular weight and the number of cations in the salt. For anionic surfactants, the Hofmeister series successfully qualitatively predicts that the salt concentration to reach HLD = 0 scales with Li > Na > K, that is, the surfactant with lithium requires more salt for the water to reach the hydrophobicity required. Although the exact salt concentration depends on the anionic surfactant headgroup, the difference in optimal salinity between two cations appears to not be dependent on headgroup. Also, CO3 reduces the activity of the cation as compared to Cl. For narrow-range alcohol ethoxylates, there is little difference between Na and K; while Li requires more salt for a given increase in hydrocarbon number of carbons to reach HLD = 0. A broad-range ethoxylate gives inconsistent results, which we attribute to the finite solubility of some surfactant components in the oil.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, a journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS) publishes scientific contributions in the surfactants and detergents area. This includes the basic and applied science of petrochemical and oleochemical surfactants, the development and performance of surfactants in all applications, as well as the development and manufacture of detergent ingredients and their formulation into finished products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信