{"title":"韩国人对替代传统婚姻形式的态度的潜在特征","authors":"Jaerim Lee, Jane Park, Seohee Son","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Despite conceptual differences between alternatives <i>to</i> traditional marital formation and alternatives <i>within</i> traditional marriage, exclusive empirical attention to the former has been restricted. We aimed to identify the latent profiles of attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation among South Koreans, including voluntary singlehood, same-sex marriage (SSM), nonmarital sex, nonmarital births, cohabitation, and domestic partnership and to examine the demographic factors that predict profile membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Traditionally, getting married was a required life event in Korea that must occur within a different-sex partner relationship prior to intercourse, childbirth, and living together. However, alternative partnerships and non-partnerships have become visible due to attitude changes. In this context, attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation may vary among Koreans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted latent profile analysis using a sample of 1584 Koreans aged 20–64 years from the 2023 Seoul Family Survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified four profiles: centrists who oppose SSM (38.0%), conservatives (27.3%), centrists across all alternatives (20.9%), and progressives (13.8%). Centrists who oppose SSM were relatively positive toward voluntary singlehood, nonmarital sex, and cohabitation; neutral toward nonmarital births and domestic partnerships; and negative toward SSM. Conservatives had relatively traditional attitudes with notable opposition to SSM. Centrists across all alternatives were neutral toward all the alternatives including SSM. Finally, progressives were the most positive toward all alternatives with the lowest score for nonmarital births. Gender, age, marital status, education, and having a religion predicted profile membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings show variation in attitudes toward partnerships beyond traditional marriage in an East Asian context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 4","pages":"1387-1406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Latent profiles of Koreans' attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation\",\"authors\":\"Jaerim Lee, Jane Park, Seohee Son\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jomf.13098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite conceptual differences between alternatives <i>to</i> traditional marital formation and alternatives <i>within</i> traditional marriage, exclusive empirical attention to the former has been restricted. We aimed to identify the latent profiles of attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation among South Koreans, including voluntary singlehood, same-sex marriage (SSM), nonmarital sex, nonmarital births, cohabitation, and domestic partnership and to examine the demographic factors that predict profile membership.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Traditionally, getting married was a required life event in Korea that must occur within a different-sex partner relationship prior to intercourse, childbirth, and living together. However, alternative partnerships and non-partnerships have become visible due to attitude changes. In this context, attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation may vary among Koreans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted latent profile analysis using a sample of 1584 Koreans aged 20–64 years from the 2023 Seoul Family Survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We identified four profiles: centrists who oppose SSM (38.0%), conservatives (27.3%), centrists across all alternatives (20.9%), and progressives (13.8%). Centrists who oppose SSM were relatively positive toward voluntary singlehood, nonmarital sex, and cohabitation; neutral toward nonmarital births and domestic partnerships; and negative toward SSM. Conservatives had relatively traditional attitudes with notable opposition to SSM. Centrists across all alternatives were neutral toward all the alternatives including SSM. Finally, progressives were the most positive toward all alternatives with the lowest score for nonmarital births. Gender, age, marital status, education, and having a religion predicted profile membership.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings show variation in attitudes toward partnerships beyond traditional marriage in an East Asian context.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"1387-1406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13098\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13098\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Latent profiles of Koreans' attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation
Objective
Despite conceptual differences between alternatives to traditional marital formation and alternatives within traditional marriage, exclusive empirical attention to the former has been restricted. We aimed to identify the latent profiles of attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation among South Koreans, including voluntary singlehood, same-sex marriage (SSM), nonmarital sex, nonmarital births, cohabitation, and domestic partnership and to examine the demographic factors that predict profile membership.
Background
Traditionally, getting married was a required life event in Korea that must occur within a different-sex partner relationship prior to intercourse, childbirth, and living together. However, alternative partnerships and non-partnerships have become visible due to attitude changes. In this context, attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation may vary among Koreans.
Method
We conducted latent profile analysis using a sample of 1584 Koreans aged 20–64 years from the 2023 Seoul Family Survey.
Results
We identified four profiles: centrists who oppose SSM (38.0%), conservatives (27.3%), centrists across all alternatives (20.9%), and progressives (13.8%). Centrists who oppose SSM were relatively positive toward voluntary singlehood, nonmarital sex, and cohabitation; neutral toward nonmarital births and domestic partnerships; and negative toward SSM. Conservatives had relatively traditional attitudes with notable opposition to SSM. Centrists across all alternatives were neutral toward all the alternatives including SSM. Finally, progressives were the most positive toward all alternatives with the lowest score for nonmarital births. Gender, age, marital status, education, and having a religion predicted profile membership.
Conclusion
The findings show variation in attitudes toward partnerships beyond traditional marriage in an East Asian context.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.