规划城市环境中的可步行性:评估政策和规划差距——以昌迪加尔为例

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tara Singla, Tej Karki
{"title":"规划城市环境中的可步行性:评估政策和规划差距——以昌迪加尔为例","authors":"Tara Singla,&nbsp;Tej Karki","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Walking is one of the easiest ways to promote better health, sustainability, and safe city environments. Le Corbusier conceived Chandigarh as a “model city,” emphasizing greens, neighborhood planning, functional zoning, and traffic separation. This initially created an equitable, walkable environment in the city. However, today, this “ideal” planned city is car-dominated, making pedestrian movement challenging and unsafe along its roads. This study explores why Chandigarh suffers from poor walkability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine sectors, including Sector 17 (the Central Business District), are chosen as the study area. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, using a photographic survey to document pedestrian infrastructure and surveying 209 regular walkers to identify key challenges. The findings prioritize issues, while a policy review assesses their alignment with Chandigarh's planning framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study identifies significant obstacles to walkability, such as obstructed zebra crossings, street harassment, poorly maintained sidewalks (footpath), single-use zoning with scattered services, fear of crime, and limited crossing time intervals, as well as discontinuous and obstructed sidewalks (footpaths) with poorly marked zebra crossings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite its original vision of a “model” city, Chandigarh has transformed into a car-centric environment that discourages walking. This case study highlights the gap between planning ideals and urban realities, demonstrating how even a purpose-built planned city can fail to meet its fundamental goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 102117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Walkability in planned urban environments: Evaluating policy and planning gaps – A case study of Chandigarh\",\"authors\":\"Tara Singla,&nbsp;Tej Karki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Walking is one of the easiest ways to promote better health, sustainability, and safe city environments. Le Corbusier conceived Chandigarh as a “model city,” emphasizing greens, neighborhood planning, functional zoning, and traffic separation. This initially created an equitable, walkable environment in the city. However, today, this “ideal” planned city is car-dominated, making pedestrian movement challenging and unsafe along its roads. This study explores why Chandigarh suffers from poor walkability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Nine sectors, including Sector 17 (the Central Business District), are chosen as the study area. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, using a photographic survey to document pedestrian infrastructure and surveying 209 regular walkers to identify key challenges. The findings prioritize issues, while a policy review assesses their alignment with Chandigarh's planning framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study identifies significant obstacles to walkability, such as obstructed zebra crossings, street harassment, poorly maintained sidewalks (footpath), single-use zoning with scattered services, fear of crime, and limited crossing time intervals, as well as discontinuous and obstructed sidewalks (footpaths) with poorly marked zebra crossings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite its original vision of a “model” city, Chandigarh has transformed into a car-centric environment that discourages walking. This case study highlights the gap between planning ideals and urban realities, demonstrating how even a purpose-built planned city can fail to meet its fundamental goals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transport & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525001379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步行是促进健康、可持续发展和安全城市环境的最简单方法之一。勒·柯布西耶将昌迪加尔设想为一个“模范城市”,强调绿色、社区规划、功能分区和交通分离。这最初在城市中创造了一个公平的、可步行的环境。然而,今天,这个“理想的”规划城市是汽车主导的,这使得沿着道路的行人运动具有挑战性和不安全。这项研究探讨了昌迪加尔的步行性差的原因。方法选取17区(中央商务区)等9个区域作为研究区域。这项研究采用了一种混合方法,使用摄影调查来记录行人基础设施,并调查了209名经常步行的人,以确定主要挑战。调查结果对问题进行了优先排序,同时一项政策审查评估了它们与昌迪加尔规划框架的一致性。结果该研究确定了影响步行性的主要障碍,如斑马线阻塞、街道骚扰、人行道(步道)维护不善、服务分散的单一用途分区、对犯罪的恐惧、有限的穿越时间间隔,以及斑马线标记不清的不连续和阻塞的人行道(步道)。尽管它最初的愿景是一个“模范”城市,但昌迪加尔已经转变为一个以汽车为中心的环境,不鼓励步行。本案例研究突出了规划理想与城市现实之间的差距,展示了即使是专门建造的规划城市也可能无法实现其基本目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Walkability in planned urban environments: Evaluating policy and planning gaps – A case study of Chandigarh

Walkability in planned urban environments: Evaluating policy and planning gaps – A case study of Chandigarh
Walking is one of the easiest ways to promote better health, sustainability, and safe city environments. Le Corbusier conceived Chandigarh as a “model city,” emphasizing greens, neighborhood planning, functional zoning, and traffic separation. This initially created an equitable, walkable environment in the city. However, today, this “ideal” planned city is car-dominated, making pedestrian movement challenging and unsafe along its roads. This study explores why Chandigarh suffers from poor walkability.

Methods

Nine sectors, including Sector 17 (the Central Business District), are chosen as the study area. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, using a photographic survey to document pedestrian infrastructure and surveying 209 regular walkers to identify key challenges. The findings prioritize issues, while a policy review assesses their alignment with Chandigarh's planning framework.

Results

The study identifies significant obstacles to walkability, such as obstructed zebra crossings, street harassment, poorly maintained sidewalks (footpath), single-use zoning with scattered services, fear of crime, and limited crossing time intervals, as well as discontinuous and obstructed sidewalks (footpaths) with poorly marked zebra crossings.

Conclusions

Despite its original vision of a “model” city, Chandigarh has transformed into a car-centric environment that discourages walking. This case study highlights the gap between planning ideals and urban realities, demonstrating how even a purpose-built planned city can fail to meet its fundamental goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信