{"title":"人工智能在种植牙医学中的应用与性能综述","authors":"Maryam Emami , Mohammadjavad Shirani","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2025.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This umbrella review evaluates the applications and performance of AI in implant dentistry, comparing its effectiveness to human intelligence. The PICO question addressed was: “In implant dentistry, how does the performance of AI-driven approaches compare to standard references or conventional methods performed by human practitioners?” A comprehensive search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until August 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and certainty evaluation. After screening 12 studies included for qualitative analysis. The majority of studies utilized deep learning (DL) models, and some studies employed traditional machine learning (TML) or simple rule-based algorithms. Most systematic reviews found AI applications and performance promising when compared to human intelligence. However, several challenges were identified, particularly in AI’s accuracy in measuring bone width and height, detecting the inferior alveolar canal, treatment planning, and predicting osseointegration. Although AI shows promise in detecting anatomical landmarks (such as the maxillary sinus), identifying implant systems, and supporting clinical decisions, current models still face significant limitations and should not yet be considered as standalone tools capable of replacing human practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application and performance of artificial intelligence in implant dentistry: An umbrella review\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Emami , Mohammadjavad Shirani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dentre.2025.100159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This umbrella review evaluates the applications and performance of AI in implant dentistry, comparing its effectiveness to human intelligence. The PICO question addressed was: “In implant dentistry, how does the performance of AI-driven approaches compare to standard references or conventional methods performed by human practitioners?” A comprehensive search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until August 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and certainty evaluation. After screening 12 studies included for qualitative analysis. The majority of studies utilized deep learning (DL) models, and some studies employed traditional machine learning (TML) or simple rule-based algorithms. Most systematic reviews found AI applications and performance promising when compared to human intelligence. However, several challenges were identified, particularly in AI’s accuracy in measuring bone width and height, detecting the inferior alveolar canal, treatment planning, and predicting osseointegration. Although AI shows promise in detecting anatomical landmarks (such as the maxillary sinus), identifying implant systems, and supporting clinical decisions, current models still face significant limitations and should not yet be considered as standalone tools capable of replacing human practitioners.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559625000082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559625000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述评估了人工智能在种植牙科中的应用和性能,并将其有效性与人类智能进行了比较。PICO解决的问题是:“在种植牙科中,人工智能驱动的方法与人类从业者执行的标准参考或传统方法相比,性能如何?”在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、PROSPERO、Cochrane Library和b谷歌Scholar等数据库中进行了全面的搜索,直到2024年8月。两名独立审稿人进行了筛选、数据提取、质量评估和确定性评估。筛选后纳入12项研究进行定性分析。大多数研究使用深度学习(DL)模型,一些研究使用传统的机器学习(TML)或简单的基于规则的算法。大多数系统评论发现,与人类智能相比,人工智能的应用和性能很有前景。然而,研究人员发现了一些挑战,特别是人工智能在测量骨宽度和高度、检测下牙槽管、治疗计划和预测骨整合方面的准确性。尽管人工智能在检测解剖标志(如上颌窦)、识别植入系统和支持临床决策方面表现出了希望,但目前的模型仍然面临着重大的局限性,尚不应被视为能够取代人类从业者的独立工具。
Application and performance of artificial intelligence in implant dentistry: An umbrella review
This umbrella review evaluates the applications and performance of AI in implant dentistry, comparing its effectiveness to human intelligence. The PICO question addressed was: “In implant dentistry, how does the performance of AI-driven approaches compare to standard references or conventional methods performed by human practitioners?” A comprehensive search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until August 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and certainty evaluation. After screening 12 studies included for qualitative analysis. The majority of studies utilized deep learning (DL) models, and some studies employed traditional machine learning (TML) or simple rule-based algorithms. Most systematic reviews found AI applications and performance promising when compared to human intelligence. However, several challenges were identified, particularly in AI’s accuracy in measuring bone width and height, detecting the inferior alveolar canal, treatment planning, and predicting osseointegration. Although AI shows promise in detecting anatomical landmarks (such as the maxillary sinus), identifying implant systems, and supporting clinical decisions, current models still face significant limitations and should not yet be considered as standalone tools capable of replacing human practitioners.