从合作到融合:非激进右翼支持者的本土主义态度

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
LIE PHILIP SANTOSO
{"title":"从合作到融合:非激进右翼支持者的本土主义态度","authors":"LIE PHILIP SANTOSO","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the impact of cooperation between radical right parties (RRPs) and non-RRPs on the policy attitudes of non-RRP supporters. As RRPs have gained prominence in recent years, particularly for their nativist and anti-immigration positions, this research investigates whether non-RRP partisans adopt similar views when their preferred parties collaborate with RRPs. Drawing on original survey data from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom in 2019, the findings reveal a notable association: non-RRP supporters are more likely to express stronger nativist attitudes when they perceive their parties as having cooperative relationship with RRPs. These results suggest the potential for ideological diffusion, where voters adjust their beliefs in response to perceived alignment with allied parties. Ultimately, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of how party cooperation affects voter attitudes, suggesting that alliances with RRPs may normalize exclusionary policies and exacerbate societal divisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 3","pages":"1549-1562"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From collaboration to convergence: Nativist attitudes among non-radical right supporters\",\"authors\":\"LIE PHILIP SANTOSO\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examines the impact of cooperation between radical right parties (RRPs) and non-RRPs on the policy attitudes of non-RRP supporters. As RRPs have gained prominence in recent years, particularly for their nativist and anti-immigration positions, this research investigates whether non-RRP partisans adopt similar views when their preferred parties collaborate with RRPs. Drawing on original survey data from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom in 2019, the findings reveal a notable association: non-RRP supporters are more likely to express stronger nativist attitudes when they perceive their parties as having cooperative relationship with RRPs. These results suggest the potential for ideological diffusion, where voters adjust their beliefs in response to perceived alignment with allied parties. Ultimately, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of how party cooperation affects voter attitudes, suggesting that alliances with RRPs may normalize exclusionary policies and exacerbate societal divisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"1549-1562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12754\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了极右翼政党与非极右翼政党之间的合作对非极右翼政党支持者政策态度的影响。由于rrp近年来获得了突出的地位,特别是他们的本土主义和反移民立场,本研究调查了当他们的首选政党与rrp合作时,非rrp党派是否会采取类似的观点。根据2019年丹麦、德国和英国的原始调查数据,研究结果揭示了一个显著的关联:当非rrp支持者认为自己的政党与rrp有合作关系时,他们更有可能表达出更强烈的本土主义态度。这些结果表明了意识形态扩散的潜力,即选民调整自己的信仰,以回应与盟友政党的结盟。最终,本文试图增强我们对政党合作如何影响选民态度的理解,表明与rrp的联盟可能使排他性政策正常化并加剧社会分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From collaboration to convergence: Nativist attitudes among non-radical right supporters

From collaboration to convergence: Nativist attitudes among non-radical right supporters

From collaboration to convergence: Nativist attitudes among non-radical right supporters

From collaboration to convergence: Nativist attitudes among non-radical right supporters

This study examines the impact of cooperation between radical right parties (RRPs) and non-RRPs on the policy attitudes of non-RRP supporters. As RRPs have gained prominence in recent years, particularly for their nativist and anti-immigration positions, this research investigates whether non-RRP partisans adopt similar views when their preferred parties collaborate with RRPs. Drawing on original survey data from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom in 2019, the findings reveal a notable association: non-RRP supporters are more likely to express stronger nativist attitudes when they perceive their parties as having cooperative relationship with RRPs. These results suggest the potential for ideological diffusion, where voters adjust their beliefs in response to perceived alignment with allied parties. Ultimately, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of how party cooperation affects voter attitudes, suggesting that alliances with RRPs may normalize exclusionary policies and exacerbate societal divisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信