豆荚中的豌豆:健康促进干预研究知识交流的相互学习过程

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura J. Kennedy, Taylor Nicholson, Khia DeSilva, Rebecca Hasdell, Gabriella Luongo, Megan Ferguson, Emily Jago, Catherine L. Mah
{"title":"豆荚中的豌豆:健康促进干预研究知识交流的相互学习过程","authors":"Laura J. Kennedy,&nbsp;Taylor Nicholson,&nbsp;Khia DeSilva,&nbsp;Rebecca Hasdell,&nbsp;Gabriella Luongo,&nbsp;Megan Ferguson,&nbsp;Emily Jago,&nbsp;Catherine L. Mah","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Knowledge exchange (KE) in health promotion research encourages the outcome of mutual learning between researchers and knowledge users. Researcher-practitioner partnerships (RPP) are an approach in health promotion intended to cultivate mutually beneficial research between different disciplines and sectors. RPPs have been found to improve intervention success and sustainability, including the bidirectional sharing of sector-specific knowledge, but how mutual learning occurs remains unclear. This paper analyses two examples of mutual learning in health promotion RPPs, as told by the practitioners and researchers involved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>During the Peas in a Pod virtual practice exchange, researchers and practitioners working in retail food environments came together to discuss KE. The event included a fireside chat with two retailers sharing their experiences collaborating with researchers. The primary author took notes from the discussion and led the writing of the case, which each practitioner reviewed for accuracy. After the fireside chat, researchers and knowledge users held small group discussions which were analysed into three themes to explore mutual learning within retail food environment research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Example one was a retailer-led hospital retail merchandising intervention study at an urban public tertiary hospital in Nova Scotia, Canada. Example two was a healthy merchandising strategy trial with an Australian Aboriginal-owned and governed not-for-profit store corporation in the Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia. Mutual learning involved (1) partnerships with both near and far-sighted vision, (2) negotiation and meeting in the middle and (3) leveraging policies and strategies to support interventions. Overall, KE bridged both knowledge and action.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This paper provides insight into how mutual learning occurs in health promotion research. Mutual learning within an RPP influenced research design and implementation. Our findings showed that knowledge exchange emerging through the intervention research also contributed to further changes in partnerships and policies. However, further study is required to understand how knowledge exchange and policies intersect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Mutual learning in knowledge exchange can contribute to health promotion intervention evidence and create pathways to new partnerships with retailers who are sceptical or hesitant about implementing retail interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peas in a Pod: The Process of Mutual Learning in Knowledge Exchange on Health Promotion Interventions Research\",\"authors\":\"Laura J. Kennedy,&nbsp;Taylor Nicholson,&nbsp;Khia DeSilva,&nbsp;Rebecca Hasdell,&nbsp;Gabriella Luongo,&nbsp;Megan Ferguson,&nbsp;Emily Jago,&nbsp;Catherine L. Mah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Knowledge exchange (KE) in health promotion research encourages the outcome of mutual learning between researchers and knowledge users. Researcher-practitioner partnerships (RPP) are an approach in health promotion intended to cultivate mutually beneficial research between different disciplines and sectors. RPPs have been found to improve intervention success and sustainability, including the bidirectional sharing of sector-specific knowledge, but how mutual learning occurs remains unclear. This paper analyses two examples of mutual learning in health promotion RPPs, as told by the practitioners and researchers involved.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the Peas in a Pod virtual practice exchange, researchers and practitioners working in retail food environments came together to discuss KE. The event included a fireside chat with two retailers sharing their experiences collaborating with researchers. The primary author took notes from the discussion and led the writing of the case, which each practitioner reviewed for accuracy. After the fireside chat, researchers and knowledge users held small group discussions which were analysed into three themes to explore mutual learning within retail food environment research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Example one was a retailer-led hospital retail merchandising intervention study at an urban public tertiary hospital in Nova Scotia, Canada. Example two was a healthy merchandising strategy trial with an Australian Aboriginal-owned and governed not-for-profit store corporation in the Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia. Mutual learning involved (1) partnerships with both near and far-sighted vision, (2) negotiation and meeting in the middle and (3) leveraging policies and strategies to support interventions. Overall, KE bridged both knowledge and action.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper provides insight into how mutual learning occurs in health promotion research. Mutual learning within an RPP influenced research design and implementation. Our findings showed that knowledge exchange emerging through the intervention research also contributed to further changes in partnerships and policies. However, further study is required to understand how knowledge exchange and policies intersect.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> So What?</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mutual learning in knowledge exchange can contribute to health promotion intervention evidence and create pathways to new partnerships with retailers who are sceptical or hesitant about implementing retail interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康促进研究中的知识交换(KE)鼓励研究者和知识使用者之间相互学习的结果。研究人员-从业人员伙伴关系(RPP)是促进健康的一种方法,旨在培养不同学科和部门之间的互利研究。研究发现,rpp可以提高干预措施的成功率和可持续性,包括双向分享部门特定知识,但相互学习是如何发生的尚不清楚。本文分析了两个健康促进rpp中相互学习的例子,这是由相关的从业者和研究人员讲述的。方法在豆荚中的豌豆虚拟实践交流中,研究人员和在零售食品环境中工作的实践者聚集在一起讨论KE。该活动包括与两位零售商在炉边聊天,分享他们与研究人员合作的经验。主要作者从讨论中做了笔记,并领导了案例的写作,每个从业者都对其进行了准确性审查。在炉边聊天后,研究人员和知识使用者进行了小组讨论,讨论分为三个主题,以探索零售食品环境研究中的相互学习。例1是在加拿大新斯科舍省的一家城市公立三级医院进行的以零售商为主导的医院零售商品干预研究。例子二是在澳大利亚北领地和昆士兰州与一家澳大利亚土著拥有和管理的非营利性商店公司进行了健康的销售策略试验。相互学习包括(1)近视眼和远视眼的伙伴关系,(2)中间的谈判和会议,(3)利用政策和战略来支持干预措施。总的来说,KE是知识和行动的桥梁。结论对健康促进研究中相互学习的过程有了新的认识。RPP内部的相互学习影响了研究的设计和实施。我们的研究结果表明,通过干预研究出现的知识交流也有助于伙伴关系和政策的进一步变化。然而,要了解知识交流与政策的相互作用,还需要进一步的研究。那又怎样?在知识交流方面的相互学习有助于提供健康促进干预措施的证据,并为与对实施零售干预措施持怀疑态度或犹豫不决的零售商建立新的伙伴关系创造途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peas in a Pod: The Process of Mutual Learning in Knowledge Exchange on Health Promotion Interventions Research

Introduction

Knowledge exchange (KE) in health promotion research encourages the outcome of mutual learning between researchers and knowledge users. Researcher-practitioner partnerships (RPP) are an approach in health promotion intended to cultivate mutually beneficial research between different disciplines and sectors. RPPs have been found to improve intervention success and sustainability, including the bidirectional sharing of sector-specific knowledge, but how mutual learning occurs remains unclear. This paper analyses two examples of mutual learning in health promotion RPPs, as told by the practitioners and researchers involved.

Methods

During the Peas in a Pod virtual practice exchange, researchers and practitioners working in retail food environments came together to discuss KE. The event included a fireside chat with two retailers sharing their experiences collaborating with researchers. The primary author took notes from the discussion and led the writing of the case, which each practitioner reviewed for accuracy. After the fireside chat, researchers and knowledge users held small group discussions which were analysed into three themes to explore mutual learning within retail food environment research.

Results

Example one was a retailer-led hospital retail merchandising intervention study at an urban public tertiary hospital in Nova Scotia, Canada. Example two was a healthy merchandising strategy trial with an Australian Aboriginal-owned and governed not-for-profit store corporation in the Northern Territory and Queensland, Australia. Mutual learning involved (1) partnerships with both near and far-sighted vision, (2) negotiation and meeting in the middle and (3) leveraging policies and strategies to support interventions. Overall, KE bridged both knowledge and action.

Conclusion

This paper provides insight into how mutual learning occurs in health promotion research. Mutual learning within an RPP influenced research design and implementation. Our findings showed that knowledge exchange emerging through the intervention research also contributed to further changes in partnerships and policies. However, further study is required to understand how knowledge exchange and policies intersect.

So What?

Mutual learning in knowledge exchange can contribute to health promotion intervention evidence and create pathways to new partnerships with retailers who are sceptical or hesitant about implementing retail interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信