{"title":"更正“从比较的角度看19世纪印度殖民统治下的棉花种植”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ehr.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rönnbäck, K. & Theodoridis, D. (2022). Cotton cultivation under colonial rule in India in the nineteenth century from a comparative perspective. <i>Economic History Review</i>, 75, 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13094</p><p>In paragraph 3 on page 375, the sentence “Labour costs per unit of output in India were therefore roughly twice those of the US at around the same time” was incorrect. This should have read “Labour costs per unit of output in the US were on average roughly twice those in India at around the same time”.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":"78 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ehr.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Cotton cultivation under colonial rule in India in the nineteenth century from a comparative perspective’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ehr.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rönnbäck, K. & Theodoridis, D. (2022). Cotton cultivation under colonial rule in India in the nineteenth century from a comparative perspective. <i>Economic History Review</i>, 75, 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13094</p><p>In paragraph 3 on page 375, the sentence “Labour costs per unit of output in India were therefore roughly twice those of the US at around the same time” was incorrect. This should have read “Labour costs per unit of output in the US were on average roughly twice those in India at around the same time”.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History Review\",\"volume\":\"78 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ehr.70024\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.70024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.70024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Rönnbäck, k &;D. Theodoridis(2022)。从比较的角度看19世纪印度殖民统治下的棉花种植。经济史评论,75,374-395。https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13094In第375页第3段,“因此,印度单位产出的劳动力成本大约是同一时期美国的两倍”这句话是不正确的。这句话应该是“在大约同一时期,美国单位产出的劳动力成本平均大约是印度的两倍”。我们为这个错误道歉。
Correction to ‘Cotton cultivation under colonial rule in India in the nineteenth century from a comparative perspective’
Rönnbäck, K. & Theodoridis, D. (2022). Cotton cultivation under colonial rule in India in the nineteenth century from a comparative perspective. Economic History Review, 75, 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13094
In paragraph 3 on page 375, the sentence “Labour costs per unit of output in India were therefore roughly twice those of the US at around the same time” was incorrect. This should have read “Labour costs per unit of output in the US were on average roughly twice those in India at around the same time”.
期刊介绍:
The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.