探索选举制度与政治家和选民的个性化行为之间的联系

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
MATHIAS TROMBORG, MARTIN VINÆS LARSEN
{"title":"探索选举制度与政治家和选民的个性化行为之间的联系","authors":"MATHIAS TROMBORG,&nbsp;MARTIN VINÆS LARSEN","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The personalization of politics includes electoral reforms that give voters more opportunity to select individual representatives as well as behavioural personalization among voters and politicians. Institutional research suggests that the latter is a function of the former, but it remains unclear whether the association between the two types of personalization is actually causal. In order to get empirical leverage on this question, we analyze local elections in Denmark, which feature within-district and within-party variation in the openness of party lists. Using detailed information on the behaviour of politicians and voters, we find that, once we take differences between districts and parties into account, the personalization of electoral rules has a negligible effect on behavioural personalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 3","pages":"1480-1491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12737","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters\",\"authors\":\"MATHIAS TROMBORG,&nbsp;MARTIN VINÆS LARSEN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The personalization of politics includes electoral reforms that give voters more opportunity to select individual representatives as well as behavioural personalization among voters and politicians. Institutional research suggests that the latter is a function of the former, but it remains unclear whether the association between the two types of personalization is actually causal. In order to get empirical leverage on this question, we analyze local elections in Denmark, which feature within-district and within-party variation in the openness of party lists. Using detailed information on the behaviour of politicians and voters, we find that, once we take differences between districts and parties into account, the personalization of electoral rules has a negligible effect on behavioural personalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"1480-1491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12737\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12737\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治的个人化包括选举改革,让选民有更多的机会选择个人代表,以及选民和政治家之间的行为个人化。机构研究表明,后者是前者的一个功能,但目前尚不清楚这两种类型的个性化之间是否存在因果关系。为了获得对这一问题的实证杠杆作用,我们分析了丹麦的地方选举,其特征是政党名单的公开性在地区内和政党内的变化。利用政治家和选民行为的详细信息,我们发现,一旦我们考虑到地区和政党之间的差异,选举规则的个性化对行为个性化的影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters

Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters

Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters

Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters

Exploring the connection between electoral systems and personalized behaviour among politicians and voters

The personalization of politics includes electoral reforms that give voters more opportunity to select individual representatives as well as behavioural personalization among voters and politicians. Institutional research suggests that the latter is a function of the former, but it remains unclear whether the association between the two types of personalization is actually causal. In order to get empirical leverage on this question, we analyze local elections in Denmark, which feature within-district and within-party variation in the openness of party lists. Using detailed information on the behaviour of politicians and voters, we find that, once we take differences between districts and parties into account, the personalization of electoral rules has a negligible effect on behavioural personalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信