为什么政府想了解公民的偏好。解释政府民意调查背后的代表性逻辑

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
ANJA DUROVIC, TINETTE SCHNATTERER
{"title":"为什么政府想了解公民的偏好。解释政府民意调查背后的代表性逻辑","authors":"ANJA DUROVIC,&nbsp;TINETTE SCHNATTERER","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While it is generally admitted that governments in most democracies make extensive use of public opinion research, we do not know much about the way they mobilize this resource. When and why do they want to learn about public opinion? What determines differences in the intensity of government polling over the electoral cycle? Are government opinion polls primarily a tool for testing the reception of government proposals or for learning more about issues that are important to citizens? And what does this tell us about the way political representation works? Understanding governments as actors in the production of public opinion, not just as passive consumers, our focus is on polls commissioned directly by governments. We argue that government polls can help us to better understand how contemporary political representation works since they can play an important role as ‘update instrument’ in anticipatory representation or as a decision-making aid in promissory representation. By studying government polls as dependent variable, we develop an innovative research design and systematically analyse the factors that explain whether the intensity of government polling (the number of questions asked) varies across different stages of the electoral cycle and whether the issues they ask about correspond more to the government's priorities or those of the public. We present evidence from Germany, mobilizing an original database of all survey questions directly commissioned by the German government during the 18th and 19th legislative periods (2013–2021). Our findings help to better understand the factors that determine the intensity of government polling at different moments of the electoral cycle and to identify the different logic of representation behind this activity. The transition from the post-election period to the routine period and from the routine period to the pre-election period correspond to turning points in the German government's use of this instrument. While we could not observe any direct effects of the electoral cycle on the intensity of government polling, the interplay between the former and different types of policy issues proves to be insightful. The government commissions significantly more survey questions on government priorities during the first 3 months in office than during routine times and significantly more survey questions on salient issues as federal elections approach. Moreover, we show that governments commission fewer questions on issues they ‘own’, which points in the same direction as previous studies showing that governments are less interested in public opinion on these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 3","pages":"1039-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12721","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling\",\"authors\":\"ANJA DUROVIC,&nbsp;TINETTE SCHNATTERER\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6765.12721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While it is generally admitted that governments in most democracies make extensive use of public opinion research, we do not know much about the way they mobilize this resource. When and why do they want to learn about public opinion? What determines differences in the intensity of government polling over the electoral cycle? Are government opinion polls primarily a tool for testing the reception of government proposals or for learning more about issues that are important to citizens? And what does this tell us about the way political representation works? Understanding governments as actors in the production of public opinion, not just as passive consumers, our focus is on polls commissioned directly by governments. We argue that government polls can help us to better understand how contemporary political representation works since they can play an important role as ‘update instrument’ in anticipatory representation or as a decision-making aid in promissory representation. By studying government polls as dependent variable, we develop an innovative research design and systematically analyse the factors that explain whether the intensity of government polling (the number of questions asked) varies across different stages of the electoral cycle and whether the issues they ask about correspond more to the government's priorities or those of the public. We present evidence from Germany, mobilizing an original database of all survey questions directly commissioned by the German government during the 18th and 19th legislative periods (2013–2021). Our findings help to better understand the factors that determine the intensity of government polling at different moments of the electoral cycle and to identify the different logic of representation behind this activity. The transition from the post-election period to the routine period and from the routine period to the pre-election period correspond to turning points in the German government's use of this instrument. While we could not observe any direct effects of the electoral cycle on the intensity of government polling, the interplay between the former and different types of policy issues proves to be insightful. The government commissions significantly more survey questions on government priorities during the first 3 months in office than during routine times and significantly more survey questions on salient issues as federal elections approach. Moreover, we show that governments commission fewer questions on issues they ‘own’, which points in the same direction as previous studies showing that governments are less interested in public opinion on these issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"1039-1067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1475-6765.12721\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12721\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然人们普遍承认,大多数民主国家的政府广泛利用民意调查,但我们对它们动员这种资源的方式知之甚少。他们什么时候,为什么想了解公众舆论?在选举周期中,是什么决定了政府民意调查强度的差异?政府民意调查主要是用来测试民众对政府提案的接受程度,还是用来了解更多对公民重要的问题?这告诉我们政治代表制是如何运作的?我们将政府理解为公众舆论产生的参与者,而不仅仅是被动的消费者,我们的重点是政府直接委托进行的民意调查。我们认为,政府民意调查可以帮助我们更好地理解当代政治代表制是如何运作的,因为它们可以在预期代表制中作为“更新工具”发挥重要作用,或者在承诺代表制中作为决策辅助工具。通过将政府民意调查作为因变量进行研究,我们开发了一种创新的研究设计,并系统地分析了解释政府民意调查的强度(所问问题的数量)在选举周期的不同阶段是否不同的因素,以及他们所问的问题是否更符合政府的优先事项或公众的优先事项。我们提供了来自德国的证据,动员了德国政府在第18届和第19届立法期间(2013-2021年)直接委托的所有调查问题的原始数据库。我们的研究结果有助于更好地理解在选举周期的不同时刻决定政府投票强度的因素,并确定这种活动背后的不同代表逻辑。从选举后阶段到常规阶段和从常规阶段到选举前阶段的过渡,对应了德国政府使用这一工具的转折点。虽然我们无法观察到选举周期对政府民意调查强度的任何直接影响,但前者与不同类型的政策问题之间的相互作用证明是有见地的。在政府上任的前三个月里,政府委托的关于政府优先事项的调查问题明显多于常规时间,随着联邦选举的临近,关于重要问题的调查问题也明显增多。此外,我们表明,政府委托对他们“拥有”的问题进行较少的调查,这与之前的研究表明政府对这些问题的公众舆论不太感兴趣的方向相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling

Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling

Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling

Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling

Why governments want to learn about citizens' preferences. Explaining the representational logic behind government polling

While it is generally admitted that governments in most democracies make extensive use of public opinion research, we do not know much about the way they mobilize this resource. When and why do they want to learn about public opinion? What determines differences in the intensity of government polling over the electoral cycle? Are government opinion polls primarily a tool for testing the reception of government proposals or for learning more about issues that are important to citizens? And what does this tell us about the way political representation works? Understanding governments as actors in the production of public opinion, not just as passive consumers, our focus is on polls commissioned directly by governments. We argue that government polls can help us to better understand how contemporary political representation works since they can play an important role as ‘update instrument’ in anticipatory representation or as a decision-making aid in promissory representation. By studying government polls as dependent variable, we develop an innovative research design and systematically analyse the factors that explain whether the intensity of government polling (the number of questions asked) varies across different stages of the electoral cycle and whether the issues they ask about correspond more to the government's priorities or those of the public. We present evidence from Germany, mobilizing an original database of all survey questions directly commissioned by the German government during the 18th and 19th legislative periods (2013–2021). Our findings help to better understand the factors that determine the intensity of government polling at different moments of the electoral cycle and to identify the different logic of representation behind this activity. The transition from the post-election period to the routine period and from the routine period to the pre-election period correspond to turning points in the German government's use of this instrument. While we could not observe any direct effects of the electoral cycle on the intensity of government polling, the interplay between the former and different types of policy issues proves to be insightful. The government commissions significantly more survey questions on government priorities during the first 3 months in office than during routine times and significantly more survey questions on salient issues as federal elections approach. Moreover, we show that governments commission fewer questions on issues they ‘own’, which points in the same direction as previous studies showing that governments are less interested in public opinion on these issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信