混合作为政府在澳大利亚学校设计和实施NAPLAN的技术

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Glenn C. Savage, David de Carvalho
{"title":"混合作为政府在澳大利亚学校设计和实施NAPLAN的技术","authors":"Glenn C. Savage,&nbsp;David de Carvalho","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This paper explores the utility of hybrid governance as an analytical lens for understanding policy design and delivery in Australian schooling reform. Using the National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) as a case study, we argue that its design and delivery processes exemplify hybridity in myriad dimensions. In a federal system in which national schooling reform relies upon negotiation and consensus building amongst a multiplicity of government and non-government stakeholders, we argue that NAPLAN's hybridity serves as a governmental technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements. Hybridity also supports the standardised implementation of the assessment across diverse schooling systems and sectors. While NAPLAN's hybridity generates strategic benefits for Australian governments, it also produces risks. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities. To address risks and leverage opportunities, we argue there are benefits to having a convening agency with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Hybrid governance offers productive insights into how Australian governments work collaboratively to design and deliver national schooling reforms.</li>\n \n <li>The National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is an exemplary case study for examining hybrid governance in the Australian federation.</li>\n \n <li>Hybrid governance serves as a technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements at the national scale and for ensuring NAPLAN's implementation is standardised across Australia's diverse subnational schooling systems and sectors.</li>\n \n <li>Hybridity creates risks and opportunities. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities.</li>\n \n <li>There are benefits to having a <i>convening agency</i> with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"84 2","pages":"362-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12673","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybridity as a governmental technique for designing and delivering NAPLAN in Australian schools\",\"authors\":\"Glenn C. Savage,&nbsp;David de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8500.12673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>This paper explores the utility of hybrid governance as an analytical lens for understanding policy design and delivery in Australian schooling reform. Using the National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) as a case study, we argue that its design and delivery processes exemplify hybridity in myriad dimensions. In a federal system in which national schooling reform relies upon negotiation and consensus building amongst a multiplicity of government and non-government stakeholders, we argue that NAPLAN's hybridity serves as a governmental technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements. Hybridity also supports the standardised implementation of the assessment across diverse schooling systems and sectors. While NAPLAN's hybridity generates strategic benefits for Australian governments, it also produces risks. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities. To address risks and leverage opportunities, we argue there are benefits to having a convening agency with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Hybrid governance offers productive insights into how Australian governments work collaboratively to design and deliver national schooling reforms.</li>\\n \\n <li>The National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is an exemplary case study for examining hybrid governance in the Australian federation.</li>\\n \\n <li>Hybrid governance serves as a technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements at the national scale and for ensuring NAPLAN's implementation is standardised across Australia's diverse subnational schooling systems and sectors.</li>\\n \\n <li>Hybridity creates risks and opportunities. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities.</li>\\n \\n <li>There are benefits to having a <i>convening agency</i> with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"volume\":\"84 2\",\"pages\":\"362-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8500.12673\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Public Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12673\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了混合治理作为理解澳大利亚学校改革政策设计和实施的分析视角的效用。以国家读写和计算能力评估项目(NAPLAN)为例,我们认为它的设计和交付过程体现了无数维度的混合性。在联邦体制中,国家学校改革依赖于政府和非政府利益相关者之间的协商和共识,我们认为NAPLAN的混合性可以作为管理和维持协作治理安排的政府技术。混合性还支持在不同的学校系统和部门标准化实施评估。NAPLAN的混合性在为澳大利亚政府带来战略利益的同时,也带来了风险。政策制定者面临的一个挑战是,在确保决策透明、责任明确和问责制的同时,利用其好处。为了应对风险和利用机遇,我们认为,在全国范围内设立一个有权管理和维持混合网络的召集机构是有益的。混合型治理为澳大利亚政府如何协同设计和实施国家学校改革提供了富有成效的见解。国家识字和计算能力评估项目(NAPLAN)是检验澳大利亚联邦混合治理的典范案例研究。混合治理作为一种管理和维持全国范围内的协作治理安排的技术,并确保NAPLAN在澳大利亚不同的地方学校系统和部门的实施标准化。混合性带来风险和机遇。政策制定者面临的一个挑战是,在确保决策透明、责任明确和问责制的同时,利用其好处。拥有一个有权管理和维持全国范围内混合网络的召集机构是有好处的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hybridity as a governmental technique for designing and delivering NAPLAN in Australian schools

Hybridity as a governmental technique for designing and delivering NAPLAN in Australian schools

This paper explores the utility of hybrid governance as an analytical lens for understanding policy design and delivery in Australian schooling reform. Using the National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) as a case study, we argue that its design and delivery processes exemplify hybridity in myriad dimensions. In a federal system in which national schooling reform relies upon negotiation and consensus building amongst a multiplicity of government and non-government stakeholders, we argue that NAPLAN's hybridity serves as a governmental technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements. Hybridity also supports the standardised implementation of the assessment across diverse schooling systems and sectors. While NAPLAN's hybridity generates strategic benefits for Australian governments, it also produces risks. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities. To address risks and leverage opportunities, we argue there are benefits to having a convening agency with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.

Points for practitioners

  • Hybrid governance offers productive insights into how Australian governments work collaboratively to design and deliver national schooling reforms.
  • The National Assessment Program in Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is an exemplary case study for examining hybrid governance in the Australian federation.
  • Hybrid governance serves as a technique for managing and sustaining collaborative governance arrangements at the national scale and for ensuring NAPLAN's implementation is standardised across Australia's diverse subnational schooling systems and sectors.
  • Hybridity creates risks and opportunities. A challenge for policymakers is to harness its benefits while ensuring transparent decision-making and clear responsibilities and accountabilities.
  • There are benefits to having a convening agency with authority to manage and sustain hybrid networks at the national scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信