微束放射治疗中快速准确剂量图预测的深度学习模型比较

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lorenzo Arsini , Jack Humphreys , Christopher White , Florian Mentzel , Jason Paino , David Bolst , Barbara Caccia , Matthew Cameron , Andrea Ciardiello , Stéphanie Corde , Elette Engels , Stefano Giagu , Anatoly Rosenfeld , Moeava Tehei , Ah Chung Tsoi , Sarah Vogel , Michael Lerch , Markus Hagenbuchner , Susanna Guatelli , Carlo Mancini Terracciano
{"title":"微束放射治疗中快速准确剂量图预测的深度学习模型比较","authors":"Lorenzo Arsini ,&nbsp;Jack Humphreys ,&nbsp;Christopher White ,&nbsp;Florian Mentzel ,&nbsp;Jason Paino ,&nbsp;David Bolst ,&nbsp;Barbara Caccia ,&nbsp;Matthew Cameron ,&nbsp;Andrea Ciardiello ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Corde ,&nbsp;Elette Engels ,&nbsp;Stefano Giagu ,&nbsp;Anatoly Rosenfeld ,&nbsp;Moeava Tehei ,&nbsp;Ah Chung Tsoi ,&nbsp;Sarah Vogel ,&nbsp;Michael Lerch ,&nbsp;Markus Hagenbuchner ,&nbsp;Susanna Guatelli ,&nbsp;Carlo Mancini Terracciano","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aim:</h3><div>Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is an innovative radiotherapy modality which uses highly focused synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams. Current pre-clinical research in MRT mostly rely on Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for dose estimation, which are highly accurate but computationally intensive. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) dose engines have been proved effective in generating fast and reliable dose distributions in different RT modalities. However, relatively few studies compare different models on the same task. This work aims to compare a Graph-Convolutional-Network-based DL model, developed in the context of Very High Energy Electron RT, to the Convolutional 3D U-Net that we recently implemented for MRT dose predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The two DL solutions are trained with 3D dose maps, generated with the MC-Toolkit Geant4, in rats used in MRT pre-clinical research. The models are evaluated against Geant4 simulations, used as ground truth, and are assessed in terms of Mean Absolute Error, Mean Relative Error, and a voxel-wise version of the <span><math><mi>γ</mi></math></span>-index. Also presented are specific comparisons of predictions in relevant tumor regions, tissues boundaries and air pockets. The two models are finally compared from the perspective of the execution time and size.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>This study finds that the two models achieve comparable overall performance. Main differences are found in their dosimetric accuracy within specific regions, such as air pockets, and their respective inference times. Consequently, the choice between models should be guided primarily by data structure and time constraints, favoring the graph-based method for its flexibility or the 3D U-Net for its faster execution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 105012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Deep Learning Models for fast and accurate dose map prediction in Microbeam Radiation Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Arsini ,&nbsp;Jack Humphreys ,&nbsp;Christopher White ,&nbsp;Florian Mentzel ,&nbsp;Jason Paino ,&nbsp;David Bolst ,&nbsp;Barbara Caccia ,&nbsp;Matthew Cameron ,&nbsp;Andrea Ciardiello ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Corde ,&nbsp;Elette Engels ,&nbsp;Stefano Giagu ,&nbsp;Anatoly Rosenfeld ,&nbsp;Moeava Tehei ,&nbsp;Ah Chung Tsoi ,&nbsp;Sarah Vogel ,&nbsp;Michael Lerch ,&nbsp;Markus Hagenbuchner ,&nbsp;Susanna Guatelli ,&nbsp;Carlo Mancini Terracciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aim:</h3><div>Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is an innovative radiotherapy modality which uses highly focused synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams. Current pre-clinical research in MRT mostly rely on Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for dose estimation, which are highly accurate but computationally intensive. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) dose engines have been proved effective in generating fast and reliable dose distributions in different RT modalities. However, relatively few studies compare different models on the same task. This work aims to compare a Graph-Convolutional-Network-based DL model, developed in the context of Very High Energy Electron RT, to the Convolutional 3D U-Net that we recently implemented for MRT dose predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>The two DL solutions are trained with 3D dose maps, generated with the MC-Toolkit Geant4, in rats used in MRT pre-clinical research. The models are evaluated against Geant4 simulations, used as ground truth, and are assessed in terms of Mean Absolute Error, Mean Relative Error, and a voxel-wise version of the <span><math><mi>γ</mi></math></span>-index. Also presented are specific comparisons of predictions in relevant tumor regions, tissues boundaries and air pockets. The two models are finally compared from the perspective of the execution time and size.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>This study finds that the two models achieve comparable overall performance. Main differences are found in their dosimetric accuracy within specific regions, such as air pockets, and their respective inference times. Consequently, the choice between models should be guided primarily by data structure and time constraints, favoring the graph-based method for its flexibility or the 3D U-Net for its faster execution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500122X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S112017972500122X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:微束放射治疗(MRT)是一种利用高度聚焦同步加速器产生的x射线微束的创新放射治疗方式。目前MRT的临床前研究主要依靠蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟进行剂量估计,该方法精度高,但计算量大。近年来,深度学习(DL)剂量引擎已被证明可以在不同的放射治疗模式下快速可靠地生成剂量分布。然而,相对较少的研究对同一任务的不同模型进行比较。这项工作旨在比较在高能电子RT背景下开发的基于图卷积网络的DL模型与我们最近用于MRT剂量预测的卷积3D U-Net。方法:使用MC-Toolkit Geant4生成的3D剂量图对两种DL溶液进行训练,用于MRT临床前研究的大鼠。这些模型是根据Geant4模拟进行评估的,用作基础事实,并根据平均绝对误差、平均相对误差和γ-指数的体素版本进行评估。还提出了相关肿瘤区域,组织边界和气穴预测的具体比较。最后从执行时间和大小的角度对两种模型进行了比较。结果:本研究发现两种模型的整体性能相当。主要差异在于它们在特定区域(如气穴)内的剂量学精度和各自的推断时间。因此,模型之间的选择应该主要由数据结构和时间限制来指导,倾向于基于图形的方法,因为它的灵活性或3D U-Net,因为它的执行速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Deep Learning Models for fast and accurate dose map prediction in Microbeam Radiation Therapy

Background and aim:

Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) is an innovative radiotherapy modality which uses highly focused synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeams. Current pre-clinical research in MRT mostly rely on Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for dose estimation, which are highly accurate but computationally intensive. Recently, Deep Learning (DL) dose engines have been proved effective in generating fast and reliable dose distributions in different RT modalities. However, relatively few studies compare different models on the same task. This work aims to compare a Graph-Convolutional-Network-based DL model, developed in the context of Very High Energy Electron RT, to the Convolutional 3D U-Net that we recently implemented for MRT dose predictions.

Methods:

The two DL solutions are trained with 3D dose maps, generated with the MC-Toolkit Geant4, in rats used in MRT pre-clinical research. The models are evaluated against Geant4 simulations, used as ground truth, and are assessed in terms of Mean Absolute Error, Mean Relative Error, and a voxel-wise version of the γ-index. Also presented are specific comparisons of predictions in relevant tumor regions, tissues boundaries and air pockets. The two models are finally compared from the perspective of the execution time and size.

Results:

This study finds that the two models achieve comparable overall performance. Main differences are found in their dosimetric accuracy within specific regions, such as air pockets, and their respective inference times. Consequently, the choice between models should be guided primarily by data structure and time constraints, favoring the graph-based method for its flexibility or the 3D U-Net for its faster execution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信