人工智能在结直肠癌治疗中的进展:系统综述

Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva, Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior
{"title":"人工智能在结直肠癌治疗中的进展:系统综述","authors":"Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva,&nbsp;Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span> 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in artificial intelligence for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive overview of systematic reviews\",\"authors\":\"Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva,&nbsp;Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC <span><math><mo>&gt;</mo></math></span> 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是世界范围内癌症相关死亡的主要原因。计算智能(CI)已经成为一种很有前途的工具,可以改善诊断、分期和治疗,但证据仍然分散在文献中。目的:本综述旨在对CI在结直肠癌治疗中的应用进行系统综述,重点介绍了算法、数据集、性能指标、临床范围和方法差距。方法:根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed和EMBASE中进行结构化检索,确定2018年至2023年间发表的系统评价。共纳入22篇综述。提取的数据包括CI技术、评估方法、目标结果和数据集特征。使用AMSTAR 2评估偏倚风险,并通过相关矩阵分析主要研究的重叠。结果:综述涉及四个临床范围:宏观病变分类(结肠镜检查)、组织学分析、疾病分期、生存或治疗预测。卷积神经网络(cnn)是最常用的模型。虽然一些应用程序显示出高性能(AUC >;0.90),大多数综述的方法学质量为低到中等。主要的限制包括缺乏外部验证、数据集异质性和有限的推广能力。在以结肠镜为基础的任务为重点的研究中观察到显著的重叠。结论:CI为结直肠癌的治疗提供了宝贵的贡献,但由于方法不一致和验证不足,阻碍了更广泛的临床应用。这篇综述提供了一个全面的综合来指导未来的研究,并促进临床使用的强大的、可解释的和可推广的模型的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advancements in artificial intelligence for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive overview of systematic reviews

Advancements in artificial intelligence for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive overview of systematic reviews

Background:

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.

Objective:

This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.

Methods:

A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.

Results:

The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC > 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.

Conclusion:

CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence-based medicine
Intelligence-based medicine Health Informatics
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
187 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信