Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva, Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior
{"title":"人工智能在结直肠癌治疗中的进展:系统综述","authors":"Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva, Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73399,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence-based medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancements in artificial intelligence for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive overview of systematic reviews\",\"authors\":\"Aurea Valeria Pereira Silva, Plinio Sa Leitao-Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence-based medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666521225000663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancements in artificial intelligence for colorectal cancer: A comprehensive overview of systematic reviews
Background:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Computational intelligence (CI) has emerged as a promising tool to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment, but evidence remains scattered across the literature.
Objective:
This tertiary review aims to synthesize systematic reviews on CI applications in CRC care, highlighting algorithms, datasets, performance metrics, clinical scopes, and methodological gaps.
Methods:
A structured search in PubMed and EMBASE identified systematic reviews published between 2018 and 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-two reviews were included. Extracted data covered CI techniques, evaluation methods, target outcomes, and dataset characteristics. Risk of bias was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was analyzed through a correlation matrix.
Results:
The reviews addressed four clinical scopes: macroscopic lesion classification (colonoscopy), histological analysis, disease staging, and survival or treatment prediction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were the most commonly used models. While some applications showed high performance (AUC 0.90), most reviews had low to moderate methodological quality. Key limitations included lack of external validation, dataset heterogeneity, and limited generalizability. Significant overlap was observed in studies focused on colonoscopy-based tasks.
Conclusion:
CI offers valuable contributions to CRC management, but broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological inconsistencies and insufficient validation. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide future research and promote the development of robust, explainable, and generalizable models for clinical use.