Emmanouil Terzidis , Fredrik Nordström , Magnus Gustafsson , Anna Karlsson , Julia Götstedt , Anna Bäck
{"title":"基于体积调制电弧治疗方案的场边缘剂量分数的三维剂量不确定度图","authors":"Emmanouil Terzidis , Fredrik Nordström , Magnus Gustafsson , Anna Karlsson , Julia Götstedt , Anna Bäck","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Absorbed dose uncertainties in radiotherapy plans are generally larger near field edges compared to the center of the field. The aim of this study was to investigate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D for plans of varying complexities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A method was developed for calculation of the fraction of field edge dose (FED), that could be visualized as a 3D uncertainty map (3DUM<sub>FED</sub>). Twelve clinical treatment plans were included for four different treatment sites that were reoptimized to create one plan with reduced complexity and one of increased complexity. 3DUM<sub>FED</sub> was calculated for all 36 plans. The highest FED for a 2 cm<sup>3</sup> volume (FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup>) and average FED (FED<sub>mean</sub>) were calculated for the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and compared with the edge area metric (EAM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High FED (above 20 %) were mainly found just outside the PTV border. FED<sub>mean</sub> in PTV was highest for the plans of increased complexity. The FED<sub>mean</sub> for PTVs and OARs, as well as the FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup> for PTVs, correlated with ρ ≥ 0.81 to EAM. The FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup> for OARs had a weaker correlation with EAM (ρ = 0.55). 3DUM<sub>FED</sub> analysis revealed that plan complexity affects different parts of the patient volume in different ways.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>3DUM<sub>FED</sub> offers a way to estimate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D. It also allows for separate evaluation in different regions of interest, unlike EAM, which mainly correlates with the dose uncertainty related to the PTV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional dose uncertainty maps based on the fraction of field edge dose for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans\",\"authors\":\"Emmanouil Terzidis , Fredrik Nordström , Magnus Gustafsson , Anna Karlsson , Julia Götstedt , Anna Bäck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Absorbed dose uncertainties in radiotherapy plans are generally larger near field edges compared to the center of the field. The aim of this study was to investigate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D for plans of varying complexities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A method was developed for calculation of the fraction of field edge dose (FED), that could be visualized as a 3D uncertainty map (3DUM<sub>FED</sub>). Twelve clinical treatment plans were included for four different treatment sites that were reoptimized to create one plan with reduced complexity and one of increased complexity. 3DUM<sub>FED</sub> was calculated for all 36 plans. The highest FED for a 2 cm<sup>3</sup> volume (FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup>) and average FED (FED<sub>mean</sub>) were calculated for the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and compared with the edge area metric (EAM).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>High FED (above 20 %) were mainly found just outside the PTV border. FED<sub>mean</sub> in PTV was highest for the plans of increased complexity. The FED<sub>mean</sub> for PTVs and OARs, as well as the FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup> for PTVs, correlated with ρ ≥ 0.81 to EAM. The FED<sub>2 cm</sub><sup>3</sup> for OARs had a weaker correlation with EAM (ρ = 0.55). 3DUM<sub>FED</sub> analysis revealed that plan complexity affects different parts of the patient volume in different ways.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>3DUM<sub>FED</sub> offers a way to estimate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D. It also allows for separate evaluation in different regions of interest, unlike EAM, which mainly correlates with the dose uncertainty related to the PTV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625001071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three-dimensional dose uncertainty maps based on the fraction of field edge dose for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans
Background and purpose
Absorbed dose uncertainties in radiotherapy plans are generally larger near field edges compared to the center of the field. The aim of this study was to investigate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D for plans of varying complexities.
Materials and methods
A method was developed for calculation of the fraction of field edge dose (FED), that could be visualized as a 3D uncertainty map (3DUMFED). Twelve clinical treatment plans were included for four different treatment sites that were reoptimized to create one plan with reduced complexity and one of increased complexity. 3DUMFED was calculated for all 36 plans. The highest FED for a 2 cm3 volume (FED2 cm3) and average FED (FEDmean) were calculated for the planning target volumes (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) and compared with the edge area metric (EAM).
Results
High FED (above 20 %) were mainly found just outside the PTV border. FEDmean in PTV was highest for the plans of increased complexity. The FEDmean for PTVs and OARs, as well as the FED2 cm3 for PTVs, correlated with ρ ≥ 0.81 to EAM. The FED2 cm3 for OARs had a weaker correlation with EAM (ρ = 0.55). 3DUMFED analysis revealed that plan complexity affects different parts of the patient volume in different ways.
Conclusions
3DUMFED offers a way to estimate dose uncertainties related to the field edge in 3D. It also allows for separate evaluation in different regions of interest, unlike EAM, which mainly correlates with the dose uncertainty related to the PTV.