不同帕克螺旋角下金星弓形激波的垂直-平行不对称性

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Nihan Chen, Haoyu Lu, Jinbin Cao, Shibang Li, Mingyu Wu, Yihui Song, Jianxuan Wang, Jianing Zhao, Yuchen Cao
{"title":"不同帕克螺旋角下金星弓形激波的垂直-平行不对称性","authors":"Nihan Chen,&nbsp;Haoyu Lu,&nbsp;Jinbin Cao,&nbsp;Shibang Li,&nbsp;Mingyu Wu,&nbsp;Yihui Song,&nbsp;Jianxuan Wang,&nbsp;Jianing Zhao,&nbsp;Yuchen Cao","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several typical asymmetries in the Venusian bow shock (BS) location, including the magnetic north-south asymmetry, the pole-equator asymmetry, and the perpendicular-parallel asymmetry, have been proven to be controlled or affected by the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. The physical reasons behind the perpendicular-parallel shock asymmetry remain inadequately explained. The effects of ion-scale dynamics have not been adequately addressed in both previous observational data and numerical simulations. Using global multifluid simulations, we demonstrate that the electric field strength differs significantly between the two types of BS, resulting in their asymmetric positions relative to the planet. The quasi-perpendicular BS generates a stronger Hall electric field, which decelerates the solar wind at a greater distance from Venus. In contrast, the weaker electric field at the quasi-parallel BS only effectively slows down the solar wind closer to the planet, leading to further compression of the induced magnetosphere and an enhanced ambipolar electric field due to increased electron pressure gradients. The differential energy transfer from the solar wind at the two BS types contributes to the asymmetry in plasma flow and magnetic field accumulation downstream. These findings provide new insights into the plasma dynamics around unmagnetized planets and highlight the role of electric field structure in shaping the induced magnetosphere of Venus.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perpendicular-Parallel Asymmetry of Venus Bow Shock Under Different Parker Spiral Angles\",\"authors\":\"Nihan Chen,&nbsp;Haoyu Lu,&nbsp;Jinbin Cao,&nbsp;Shibang Li,&nbsp;Mingyu Wu,&nbsp;Yihui Song,&nbsp;Jianxuan Wang,&nbsp;Jianing Zhao,&nbsp;Yuchen Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several typical asymmetries in the Venusian bow shock (BS) location, including the magnetic north-south asymmetry, the pole-equator asymmetry, and the perpendicular-parallel asymmetry, have been proven to be controlled or affected by the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. The physical reasons behind the perpendicular-parallel shock asymmetry remain inadequately explained. The effects of ion-scale dynamics have not been adequately addressed in both previous observational data and numerical simulations. Using global multifluid simulations, we demonstrate that the electric field strength differs significantly between the two types of BS, resulting in their asymmetric positions relative to the planet. The quasi-perpendicular BS generates a stronger Hall electric field, which decelerates the solar wind at a greater distance from Venus. In contrast, the weaker electric field at the quasi-parallel BS only effectively slows down the solar wind closer to the planet, leading to further compression of the induced magnetosphere and an enhanced ambipolar electric field due to increased electron pressure gradients. The differential energy transfer from the solar wind at the two BS types contributes to the asymmetry in plasma flow and magnetic field accumulation downstream. These findings provide new insights into the plasma dynamics around unmagnetized planets and highlight the role of electric field structure in shaping the induced magnetosphere of Venus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008829\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金星弓形激波(BS)位置的几种典型不对称性,包括磁的南北不对称性、极-赤道不对称性和垂直-平行不对称性,已被证明是由行星际磁场方向控制或影响的。垂直-平行激波不对称背后的物理原因仍未得到充分解释。离子尺度动力学的影响在以前的观测数据和数值模拟中都没有得到充分的解决。利用全球多流体模拟,我们证明了两种类型的BS之间的电场强度差异很大,导致它们相对于地球的不对称位置。准垂直BS产生更强的霍尔电场,使太阳风在离金星更远的地方减速。相比之下,准平行BS处较弱的电场只能有效地减缓太阳风靠近行星的速度,导致感应磁层进一步压缩,并且由于电子压力梯度的增加而增强了双极电场。两种BS类型的太阳风能量传递的差异导致了等离子体流动和下游磁场积累的不对称性。这些发现为非磁化行星周围的等离子体动力学提供了新的见解,并强调了电场结构在塑造金星诱导磁层中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perpendicular-Parallel Asymmetry of Venus Bow Shock Under Different Parker Spiral Angles

Several typical asymmetries in the Venusian bow shock (BS) location, including the magnetic north-south asymmetry, the pole-equator asymmetry, and the perpendicular-parallel asymmetry, have been proven to be controlled or affected by the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. The physical reasons behind the perpendicular-parallel shock asymmetry remain inadequately explained. The effects of ion-scale dynamics have not been adequately addressed in both previous observational data and numerical simulations. Using global multifluid simulations, we demonstrate that the electric field strength differs significantly between the two types of BS, resulting in their asymmetric positions relative to the planet. The quasi-perpendicular BS generates a stronger Hall electric field, which decelerates the solar wind at a greater distance from Venus. In contrast, the weaker electric field at the quasi-parallel BS only effectively slows down the solar wind closer to the planet, leading to further compression of the induced magnetosphere and an enhanced ambipolar electric field due to increased electron pressure gradients. The differential energy transfer from the solar wind at the two BS types contributes to the asymmetry in plasma flow and magnetic field accumulation downstream. These findings provide new insights into the plasma dynamics around unmagnetized planets and highlight the role of electric field structure in shaping the induced magnetosphere of Venus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信