{"title":"伦敦两所学校对10 - 11岁学生的“理想”女学生和混合女性模式的概念","authors":"Jon Swain","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores patterns of femininity in two London schools. Generating data from small group interviews with 49, 10–11-year-old girls in 2022, the research found a heterosexualised, ‘emphasised’, femininity to be a minority form, and introduces a hybrid femininity, consisting of traditional feminine and masculine qualities. This was the most common and valorised version and was also connected to the characteristics of an ‘idealised’ schoolgirl. Although hybrid forms have been applied to adolescent girls and women, they are under-theorised with pre-adolescents. Taking a social constructionist approach, the paper views femininities as being relational and argues they are temporal, situated, dynamic and fluid. Some girls could be ‘tomboys’ and ‘girly-girls’ without feeling any contradiction or fear of derogation. Unable to find a particular, dominant, form of femininity, there was also an absence of gender hierarchies. The paper suggests that neither a singular and dominant form, nor a steep hierarchy of femininities in every setting, is neither axiomatic nor inevitable, and that the gender landscape can be more even and less steep. The research also argues that schools can counter and change inequalities, particularly when children are actively involved in the process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notions of the ‘ideal’ schoolgirl and hybrid patterns of femininity for 10–11-year-olds in two London schools\",\"authors\":\"Jon Swain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores patterns of femininity in two London schools. Generating data from small group interviews with 49, 10–11-year-old girls in 2022, the research found a heterosexualised, ‘emphasised’, femininity to be a minority form, and introduces a hybrid femininity, consisting of traditional feminine and masculine qualities. This was the most common and valorised version and was also connected to the characteristics of an ‘idealised’ schoolgirl. Although hybrid forms have been applied to adolescent girls and women, they are under-theorised with pre-adolescents. Taking a social constructionist approach, the paper views femininities as being relational and argues they are temporal, situated, dynamic and fluid. Some girls could be ‘tomboys’ and ‘girly-girls’ without feeling any contradiction or fear of derogation. Unable to find a particular, dominant, form of femininity, there was also an absence of gender hierarchies. The paper suggests that neither a singular and dominant form, nor a steep hierarchy of femininities in every setting, is neither axiomatic nor inevitable, and that the gender landscape can be more even and less steep. The research also argues that schools can counter and change inequalities, particularly when children are actively involved in the process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000986\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Notions of the ‘ideal’ schoolgirl and hybrid patterns of femininity for 10–11-year-olds in two London schools
This paper explores patterns of femininity in two London schools. Generating data from small group interviews with 49, 10–11-year-old girls in 2022, the research found a heterosexualised, ‘emphasised’, femininity to be a minority form, and introduces a hybrid femininity, consisting of traditional feminine and masculine qualities. This was the most common and valorised version and was also connected to the characteristics of an ‘idealised’ schoolgirl. Although hybrid forms have been applied to adolescent girls and women, they are under-theorised with pre-adolescents. Taking a social constructionist approach, the paper views femininities as being relational and argues they are temporal, situated, dynamic and fluid. Some girls could be ‘tomboys’ and ‘girly-girls’ without feeling any contradiction or fear of derogation. Unable to find a particular, dominant, form of femininity, there was also an absence of gender hierarchies. The paper suggests that neither a singular and dominant form, nor a steep hierarchy of femininities in every setting, is neither axiomatic nor inevitable, and that the gender landscape can be more even and less steep. The research also argues that schools can counter and change inequalities, particularly when children are actively involved in the process.
期刊介绍:
Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.