高双链DNA片段化的精子样本在处理后显示出与低片段化相似的受精结果:使用PGT-A的卵子供体周期的回顾性分析

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
A Zavala, S Cortes, C Andrés, A Cayado, S Ruiz, J A Horcajadas, H Izquierdo, L Ortega
{"title":"高双链DNA片段化的精子样本在处理后显示出与低片段化相似的受精结果:使用PGT-A的卵子供体周期的回顾性分析","authors":"A Zavala, S Cortes, C Andrés, A Cayado, S Ruiz, J A Horcajadas, H Izquierdo, L Ortega","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question Does the presence of high double-strand DNA fragmentation (≥60%) in sperm samples significantly compromise fertilization, blast formation, and overall euploidy rates in egg donation cycles? Summary answer In a retrospective analysis of 303 donor-oocyte cycles, increased sperm DNA double-strand fragmentation (≥60%) did not notably reduce fertilization, blastocyst formation, or euploid rate. What is known already Elevated DNA fragmentation in sperm has long been suggested to impair embryo quality and reduce reproductive outcomes. Double-strand (DS) DNA breaks, in particular, is believed to have a more deleterious effects than single-strand breaks on fertilization, blastocyst formation, and embryo ploidy. Prior studies suggest that higher DS fragmentation may increase aneuploidy rates or reduce implantation success. However, the clinical impact of moderate or even very high DS fragmentation remains debated. In many assisted reproduction laboratories, sperm selection techniques are implemented when DS fragmentation surpasses certain thresholds, yet robust prospective data remain scarce. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study examined 303 donor-oocyte cycles performed at a single fertility center between January/2022-December/2024. Sperm samples underwent DS fragmentation testing with the Comet assay and were classified into three groups: <60%, 60–69%, and ≥70%. Fertilization, blastocyst formation, and chromosomal status (assessed via PGT-a). The study aimed to determine whether high DS fragmentation had a negative impact on these outcomes compared with normal or moderately elevated fragmentation over the three-year retrospective period. Participants/materials, setting, methods Sperm-samples were prepared by swim-up or microfluidic-chip (CHIP-Fertile) if fragmentation ranged from 60–79%, and by SpermSlow selection if ≥ 80% or frozen semen sample. All oocytes originated from donors aged 18–35 years. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was used for fertilization. Blastocysts were biopsied on Day 5-6 and analyzed via next-generation sequencing. Primary outcomes included fertilization yield (2PN/oocytes injected), blastocyst yield, and chromosome status (euploid/aneuploid/mosaic). Statistical comparisons were performed via ANOVA and linear models. Main results and the role of chance Among 303 cycles, 116 (62%) showed DS fragmentation <60%, 104 (23%) had 60–69%, and 83 (15%) had ≥70%. No significant differences were observed in total M2 oocytes or PN2 embryos across groups: mean (±SD) values were 7.23 ± 2.22, 7.19 ± 2.20, and 7.53 ± 2.34, respectively (p = 0.54). Total blastocyst numbers also remained comparable (5.75 ± 2.02, 5.57 ± 2.20, 5.88 ± 2.15; p = 0.59). Euploid outcomes showed no statistically significant variation: 3.03 ± 1,64 in < 60%, 2.85 ± 1.62 in 60–69%, and 3.28 ± 1.54 in ≥ 70% (p = 0.19). Linear regression modeling of euploid embryo proportions revealed no meaningful association with DS fragmentation group or male age (p = 0.120). Aneuploid rates similarly did not differ, and mosaic rates remained constant among groups. The overall model R-squared was consistently low (<2%), indicating neither fragmentation level nor age accounted for substantial variation in these embryologic endpoints. These findings suggest that sperm samples with elevated DS fragmentation have similar fertilization outcomes or chromosomal status within egg-donation cycles when treated with additional sperm-selection techniques. Limitations, reasons for caution As a retrospective analysis from a single center, the possibility of confounding by unmeasured variables cannot be ruled out. This study focused on egg donation cycles, which may not fully generalize to own-egg IVF. Although selection techniques were standardized, randomized trials and larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. Wider implications of the findings Our findings suggest that sperm samples with increased double-strand DNA fragmentation justify the use of adequate sperm-selection techniques such as SpermSlow or microfluidic-chip in egg donation cycles. However, a comprehensive assessment of additional male and female factors remains crucial. Trial registration number No","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"644 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P-030 Sperm samples with elevated double-strand DNA fragmentation demonstrate similar fertilization outcomes to low fragmentation when treated: a retrospective analysis of egg donor cycles with PGT-A\",\"authors\":\"A Zavala, S Cortes, C Andrés, A Cayado, S Ruiz, J A Horcajadas, H Izquierdo, L Ortega\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study question Does the presence of high double-strand DNA fragmentation (≥60%) in sperm samples significantly compromise fertilization, blast formation, and overall euploidy rates in egg donation cycles? Summary answer In a retrospective analysis of 303 donor-oocyte cycles, increased sperm DNA double-strand fragmentation (≥60%) did not notably reduce fertilization, blastocyst formation, or euploid rate. What is known already Elevated DNA fragmentation in sperm has long been suggested to impair embryo quality and reduce reproductive outcomes. Double-strand (DS) DNA breaks, in particular, is believed to have a more deleterious effects than single-strand breaks on fertilization, blastocyst formation, and embryo ploidy. Prior studies suggest that higher DS fragmentation may increase aneuploidy rates or reduce implantation success. However, the clinical impact of moderate or even very high DS fragmentation remains debated. In many assisted reproduction laboratories, sperm selection techniques are implemented when DS fragmentation surpasses certain thresholds, yet robust prospective data remain scarce. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study examined 303 donor-oocyte cycles performed at a single fertility center between January/2022-December/2024. Sperm samples underwent DS fragmentation testing with the Comet assay and were classified into three groups: <60%, 60–69%, and ≥70%. Fertilization, blastocyst formation, and chromosomal status (assessed via PGT-a). The study aimed to determine whether high DS fragmentation had a negative impact on these outcomes compared with normal or moderately elevated fragmentation over the three-year retrospective period. Participants/materials, setting, methods Sperm-samples were prepared by swim-up or microfluidic-chip (CHIP-Fertile) if fragmentation ranged from 60–79%, and by SpermSlow selection if ≥ 80% or frozen semen sample. All oocytes originated from donors aged 18–35 years. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was used for fertilization. Blastocysts were biopsied on Day 5-6 and analyzed via next-generation sequencing. Primary outcomes included fertilization yield (2PN/oocytes injected), blastocyst yield, and chromosome status (euploid/aneuploid/mosaic). Statistical comparisons were performed via ANOVA and linear models. Main results and the role of chance Among 303 cycles, 116 (62%) showed DS fragmentation <60%, 104 (23%) had 60–69%, and 83 (15%) had ≥70%. No significant differences were observed in total M2 oocytes or PN2 embryos across groups: mean (±SD) values were 7.23 ± 2.22, 7.19 ± 2.20, and 7.53 ± 2.34, respectively (p = 0.54). Total blastocyst numbers also remained comparable (5.75 ± 2.02, 5.57 ± 2.20, 5.88 ± 2.15; p = 0.59). Euploid outcomes showed no statistically significant variation: 3.03 ± 1,64 in < 60%, 2.85 ± 1.62 in 60–69%, and 3.28 ± 1.54 in ≥ 70% (p = 0.19). Linear regression modeling of euploid embryo proportions revealed no meaningful association with DS fragmentation group or male age (p = 0.120). Aneuploid rates similarly did not differ, and mosaic rates remained constant among groups. The overall model R-squared was consistently low (<2%), indicating neither fragmentation level nor age accounted for substantial variation in these embryologic endpoints. These findings suggest that sperm samples with elevated DS fragmentation have similar fertilization outcomes or chromosomal status within egg-donation cycles when treated with additional sperm-selection techniques. Limitations, reasons for caution As a retrospective analysis from a single center, the possibility of confounding by unmeasured variables cannot be ruled out. This study focused on egg donation cycles, which may not fully generalize to own-egg IVF. Although selection techniques were standardized, randomized trials and larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. Wider implications of the findings Our findings suggest that sperm samples with increased double-strand DNA fragmentation justify the use of adequate sperm-selection techniques such as SpermSlow or microfluidic-chip in egg donation cycles. However, a comprehensive assessment of additional male and female factors remains crucial. Trial registration number No\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"644 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.339\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.339","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精子样本中存在高双链DNA片段(≥60%)是否会显著影响卵子捐赠周期中的受精、胚形成和整体整倍体率?在对303个供体-卵母细胞周期的回顾性分析中,增加的精子DNA双链断裂(≥60%)并没有显著降低受精率、囊胚形成或整倍体率。众所周知,精子中DNA片段的升高长期以来一直被认为会损害胚胎质量并降低生殖结果。特别是双链DNA断裂,被认为比单链DNA断裂对受精、囊胚形成和胚胎倍性有更大的有害影响。先前的研究表明,较高的DS碎片化可能增加非整倍体率或降低着床成功率。然而,中度甚至非常高的椎体退行性椎体裂的临床影响仍存在争议。在许多辅助生殖实验室中,当DS碎片超过一定阈值时,就会实施精子选择技术,但可靠的前瞻性数据仍然很少。本回顾性研究调查了2022年1月至2024年12月在单个生育中心进行的303次供体-卵母细胞周期。采用Comet法对精子样本进行DS碎片化测试,并将其分为三组:60%、60-69%和≥70%。受精,囊胚形成和染色体状态(通过PGT-a评估)。该研究旨在确定在三年的回顾性研究期间,与正常或中度升高的碎片化相比,高DS碎片化是否会对这些结果产生负面影响。如果碎片率为60-79%,则采用游泳或微流控芯片(CHIP-Fertile)制备精子样本;如果碎片率≥80%,则采用SpermSlow选择或冷冻精液样本。所有卵母细胞均来自18-35岁的捐赠者。采用胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)进行受精。在第5-6天对囊胚进行活检,并通过下一代测序进行分析。主要结局包括受精率(注射2PN/卵母细胞)、囊胚产量和染色体状态(整倍体/非整倍体/嵌合体)。通过方差分析和线性模型进行统计比较。303个循环中,DS破碎率为60%的116个(62%),60 ~ 69%的104个(23%),≥70%的83个(15%)。M2卵母细胞总数和PN2胚胎总数各组间差异无统计学意义,平均(±SD)值分别为7.23±2.22、7.19±2.20和7.53±2.34 (p = 0.54)。囊胚总数(5.75±2.02,5.57±2.20,5.88±2.15;P = 0.59)。整倍体结果差异无统计学意义:3.03±1.64;60%, 60-69%为2.85±1.62,≥70%为3.28±1.54 (p = 0.19)。线性回归模型显示整倍体胚胎比例与DS破碎组和男性年龄无显著相关性(p = 0.120)。非整倍体率同样没有差异,各组间的镶嵌率保持不变。整体模型r平方一直很低(2%),表明碎片化水平和年龄都不是这些胚胎学终点的实质性变化。这些发现表明,当使用额外的精子选择技术处理时,具有高DS碎片的精子样本在卵子捐赠周期内具有相似的受精结果或染色体状态。局限性,谨慎的原因作为单中心的回顾性分析,不能排除未测量变量混淆的可能性。这项研究的重点是卵子捐赠周期,这可能不能完全推广到自有卵子体外受精。虽然选择技术是标准化的,但需要随机试验和更大的队列来证实这些发现。我们的研究结果表明,双链DNA断裂增加的精子样本证明了在卵子捐赠周期中使用适当的精子选择技术(如SpermSlow或微流控芯片)是合理的。然而,对其他男性和女性因素的全面评估仍然至关重要。试验注册号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P-030 Sperm samples with elevated double-strand DNA fragmentation demonstrate similar fertilization outcomes to low fragmentation when treated: a retrospective analysis of egg donor cycles with PGT-A
Study question Does the presence of high double-strand DNA fragmentation (≥60%) in sperm samples significantly compromise fertilization, blast formation, and overall euploidy rates in egg donation cycles? Summary answer In a retrospective analysis of 303 donor-oocyte cycles, increased sperm DNA double-strand fragmentation (≥60%) did not notably reduce fertilization, blastocyst formation, or euploid rate. What is known already Elevated DNA fragmentation in sperm has long been suggested to impair embryo quality and reduce reproductive outcomes. Double-strand (DS) DNA breaks, in particular, is believed to have a more deleterious effects than single-strand breaks on fertilization, blastocyst formation, and embryo ploidy. Prior studies suggest that higher DS fragmentation may increase aneuploidy rates or reduce implantation success. However, the clinical impact of moderate or even very high DS fragmentation remains debated. In many assisted reproduction laboratories, sperm selection techniques are implemented when DS fragmentation surpasses certain thresholds, yet robust prospective data remain scarce. Study design, size, duration This retrospective study examined 303 donor-oocyte cycles performed at a single fertility center between January/2022-December/2024. Sperm samples underwent DS fragmentation testing with the Comet assay and were classified into three groups: <60%, 60–69%, and ≥70%. Fertilization, blastocyst formation, and chromosomal status (assessed via PGT-a). The study aimed to determine whether high DS fragmentation had a negative impact on these outcomes compared with normal or moderately elevated fragmentation over the three-year retrospective period. Participants/materials, setting, methods Sperm-samples were prepared by swim-up or microfluidic-chip (CHIP-Fertile) if fragmentation ranged from 60–79%, and by SpermSlow selection if ≥ 80% or frozen semen sample. All oocytes originated from donors aged 18–35 years. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was used for fertilization. Blastocysts were biopsied on Day 5-6 and analyzed via next-generation sequencing. Primary outcomes included fertilization yield (2PN/oocytes injected), blastocyst yield, and chromosome status (euploid/aneuploid/mosaic). Statistical comparisons were performed via ANOVA and linear models. Main results and the role of chance Among 303 cycles, 116 (62%) showed DS fragmentation <60%, 104 (23%) had 60–69%, and 83 (15%) had ≥70%. No significant differences were observed in total M2 oocytes or PN2 embryos across groups: mean (±SD) values were 7.23 ± 2.22, 7.19 ± 2.20, and 7.53 ± 2.34, respectively (p = 0.54). Total blastocyst numbers also remained comparable (5.75 ± 2.02, 5.57 ± 2.20, 5.88 ± 2.15; p = 0.59). Euploid outcomes showed no statistically significant variation: 3.03 ± 1,64 in < 60%, 2.85 ± 1.62 in 60–69%, and 3.28 ± 1.54 in ≥ 70% (p = 0.19). Linear regression modeling of euploid embryo proportions revealed no meaningful association with DS fragmentation group or male age (p = 0.120). Aneuploid rates similarly did not differ, and mosaic rates remained constant among groups. The overall model R-squared was consistently low (<2%), indicating neither fragmentation level nor age accounted for substantial variation in these embryologic endpoints. These findings suggest that sperm samples with elevated DS fragmentation have similar fertilization outcomes or chromosomal status within egg-donation cycles when treated with additional sperm-selection techniques. Limitations, reasons for caution As a retrospective analysis from a single center, the possibility of confounding by unmeasured variables cannot be ruled out. This study focused on egg donation cycles, which may not fully generalize to own-egg IVF. Although selection techniques were standardized, randomized trials and larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings. Wider implications of the findings Our findings suggest that sperm samples with increased double-strand DNA fragmentation justify the use of adequate sperm-selection techniques such as SpermSlow or microfluidic-chip in egg donation cycles. However, a comprehensive assessment of additional male and female factors remains crucial. Trial registration number No
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信